Evaluate the Effectiveness and Cost of Stress Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) for Non-invasive Evaluation of Lesions Discovered on Computed Tomography Angiography (CCTA) (DSTAT)

Dual-Source CT and STress Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Assessment in the Triage of Patients With Suspected Acute Coronary Syndromes (D-STAT)

This study is designed to evaluate the effectiveness and measurable cost impact of stress cardiac MRI for non-invasive evaluation of intermediate lesions discovered on CCTA in low-to-intermediate risk patients admitted to the ED with suspected ACS. Our primary objective is to determine if the strategy of CTA + stress CMR will reduce the length of time in the ED required to establish a definitive diagnosis, compared to CTA + stress MPI.

Study Overview

• Status: Terminated
• Conditions: Coronary Disease

Detailed Description

Non-invasive evaluation of coronary anatomy via multi-slice computed tomography with coronary CT angiography (CCTA) has been shown to provide rapid and accurate non-invasive coronary angiography. Although CCTA can be rapidly and safely performed and despite improving our ability to image coronary arteries in this noninvasive fashion, the limitation of CCTA is lack of physiological information in intermediate lesions, i.e., if a patient has a blockage of 40-60% on CCTA in an artery, it is not possible to know if this is what causes symptoms in a patient. This limitation is currently being overcome by stress testing, commonly with perfusion imaging (nuclear stress test). However, disadvantages of nuclear stress testing include long testing times (usually > 4 hours) and use of radiation. Patients with intermediate/uninterpretable lesions on CCTA will be randomized to MPI or MRI.

The endpoints of the study are:

Primary outcome variables:

1. Length of ED stay until definitive diagnosis (time from ED triage until definitive diagnosis).

Secondary outcome variables will include:

1. Cost of care of an early diagnostic strategy utilizing stress CMR vs. standard care (costs incurred during index hospitalization and 30 day follow up period) in patients with intermediate lesions of CTA.
2. Accuracy of CTA + stress CMR in prediction of occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) during a 3 month follow-up period, compared to the standard care (CTA + stress/rest MPI): cardiac death, acute myocardial infarction, need for coronary artery revascularization, need for admission or treatment for documented CAD.

• Study Type: Observational
• Enrollment (Actual): 1

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• United States
  • Michigan
    • Royal Oak, Michigan, United States, 48073
      • William Beaumont Hospital

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: Yes
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

• Sampling Method: Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Volunteers over 18 years of age; both genders

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Patients with chest pain or other symptoms suggestive of acute cardiac ischemia.
2. Low risk TIMI risk score (ie. ≤3)
3. Able to provide informed consent
4. Age equal to or greater than 18 years.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Electrocardiographic evidence of ischemia, including acute STEMI (ST elevation equal to or greater than 1mm in two or more leads), ST segment depression and/or T wave inversion (not known to be old), or attending physician clinical decision for immediate invasive evaluation.
2. Positive cardiac biomarkers (troponin, myoglobin, and/or creatinine phosphokinase MB fraction).
3. Presence of pre-existing CAD (prior myocardial infarction, prior angiographic evidence of significant CAD, prior coronary bypass surgery) or cardiomyopathy (ejection fraction < 45%)
4. Renal insufficiency (creatinine ≥1.6) or renal failure requiring dialysis.
5. Atrial fibrillation or other markedly irregular rhythm.
6. Inability or refusal to provide informed consent.
7. Psychological unsuitability or extreme claustrophobia.
8. Pregnancy or unknown pregnancy status.
9. Age less than 18 years.
10. Clinical instability as deemed by the attending physician; including cardiogenic shock, hypotension (systolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg), refractory hypertension (systolic blood pressure > 180 mmHg), sustained ventricular or atrial arrhythmia requiring intravenous medications.
11. Patients with known allergy to iodine or shellfish.
12. Inability to tolerate beta blockers, including those with COPD or asthma requiring maintenance inhaled bronchodilators or steroids, complete heart block, second-degree atrioventricular block.
13. Computed tomography imaging, or contrast administration, within the past 48 hours.
14. Use of Viagra or Cialis in the past 24 hours.
15. Patients with known allergy to gadolinium, x-ray dye, Persantine
16. Extreme claustrophobia.
17. Patients with metal implants that prevent MRI scanning
18. Patients with a body weight > 400 lbs

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: William Beaumont Hospitals
• Investigators: Principal Investigator: Kavitha Chinnaiyan, MD, William Beaumont Hospitals; Study Director: Gilbert Raff, MD, William Beaumont Hospitals

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start: September 1, 2007
• Primary Completion (Actual): April 1, 2009
• Study Completion (Actual): April 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: October 1, 2007
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: October 1, 2007
• First Posted (Estimate): October 2, 2007

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Estimate): March 1, 2010
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: February 26, 2010
• Last Verified: February 1, 2010

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: magnetic resonance imaging; coronary artery disease; tomography
• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Myocardial Ischemia; Heart Diseases; Cardiovascular Diseases; Vascular Diseases; Coronary Disease
• Other Study ID Numbers: 2007-085