Anaemia Correction in Haemodialyzed Patients - Comparative Analysis of Two Erythropoietin Stimulating Agents Schedules (VAES)

December 21, 2017 updated by: Anemia Working Group Romania

Several recent reports support the efficacy of once every-other-week epoetinum administration in the maintenance phase of the anaemia treatment in predialysis, haemodialysis and in peritoneal dialysis CKD patients.

However, there are studies suggesting that in HD patients receiving SC short-acting ESA therapy, ESA efficacy decreases when the dosing is extended from thrice-weekly to once-weekly administration. When every-2-week administration of long-acting ESAs is extended to every 4 weeks, efficacy either remains stable or decreases incrementally. The GAIN trial (Gain effectiveness in Anemia treatment with NeoRecormon®) was designed to compare anemia management with epoetin beta, epoetin alpha or darbepoetin alpha in HD patients. An interim analysis of data from 1005 stable HD patients suggested that switching to epoetin beta from either epoetin alpha or darbepoetin alpha resulted in improved efficacy and a 20% dose reduction in SC epoetin beta.

The aim of the study is to compare two schedules of anaemia treatment in HD patients using two different erythropoietic stimulating agents (epoetinum beta vs darbepoetinum) with respect to the efficacy in anaemia correction and to the haemoglobin (Hb) level stability.

This is a multicenter (2 centers), prospective, open-label, parallel, controlled trial of therapy equivalence

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Currently available ESAs include epoetin alfa, epoetin beta, and darbepoetin. Epoetin alfa and beta have been designed to resemble closely the endogenous molecule and have similar pharmacokinetics. They are considered "short-acting" in comparison to darbepoetin, a second-generation molecule with a prolonged half-life, which is considered "long-acting." European and American Best Practice Guidelines (EBPG) recommend preferential subcutaneous (SC) twice- to thrice-weekly epoetin administration. There is a great deal of evidence that once-weekly SC administration of epoetin beta to be equally efficient and well tolerated in HD patients, even in those requiring high weekly epoetin doses. Several recent reports support the efficacy of once every-other-week epoetinum administration in the maintenance phase of the anaemia treatment in predialysis, haemodialysis and in peritoneal dialysis CKD patients.

However, there are studies suggesting that in HD patients receiving SC short-acting ESA therapy, ESA efficacy decreases when the dosing is extended from thrice-weekly to once-weekly administration. When every-2-week administration of long-acting ESAs is extended to every 4 weeks, efficacy either remains stable or decreases incrementally . The GAIN trial (Gain effectiveness in Anemia treatment with NeoRecormon®) was designed to compare anemia management with epoetin beta, epoetin alpha or darbepoetin alpha in HD patients. An interim analysis of data from 1005 stable HD patients suggested that switching to epoetin beta from either epoetin alpha or darbepoetin alpha resulted in improved efficacy and a 20% dose reduction in SC epoetin beta.

The aim of the study is to compare two schedules of anaemia treatment in HD patients using two different erythropoietic stimulating agents (epoetinum beta vs darbepoetinum) with respect to the efficacy in anaemia correction and to the haemoglobin (Hb) level stability.

The trial is designed according to the Guidelines for studies testing the equivalence of different treatment regimens , and will be conducted with the provisions of the Declaration of Helsinki and Tokio as amended in Venice (1983).

This is a multicenter (2 centers), prospective, open-label, parallel, controlled trial of therapy equivalence.

The total observation period is of 80 weeks:

  • The baseline phase (pre-therapeutic intervention) - 12 weeks;
  • The first study phase of therapeutical intervention - 48 weeks: each the two groups of patients will receive anaemia treatment according to the Romanian Best Practice Guidelines either with epoetinum beta or with darbepoetinum;
  • The second study phase of therapeutical intervention - 24 weeks: the patients from the epoetinum beta group will be switched to darbepoetinum. The anaemia treatment will continue according to the Romanian Best Practice Guidelines, using the recommended conversion factor of 200 (Romanian Best Practice Guidelines, NKF-DOQI 2006, Revised EBPG).

    300 haemodialyzed patients will be enrolled.

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bucharest, Romania, 0107231
        • "Dr Carol Davila" Fresenius NephroCare Dialysis Centre
      • Bucharest, Romania
        • IHS Dialysis Centre "Sf Ioan Nou" Clinical Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • adult age (≥18 years)
  • at least 6 months HD
  • efficient HD (urea-equilibrated Kt/V >1.2, Daugirdas II equation)
  • haemoglobin (Hb) levels above 10g/dL
  • treatment with an ESA for at least 12 weeks prior to enrollment
  • serum ferritin level 100-800 ng/mL
  • transferrin saturation 20-50%.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • hepatic diseases (as defined by abnormal ALT and AST levels) or association of psychical disorders or other disturbances making the enrollment unacceptable, as judged by the physician
  • acute infection or HIV infection
  • severe hyperparathyroidism (iPTH >800 ng/mL)
  • active bleeding
  • > 5% variation in dry body weight in the last 6 months
  • previously diagnosed folic acid and/or vitamin B12 deficiency
  • neoplastic diseases
  • other known causes of anaemia
  • known hypersensibility to one of the administered drugs
  • epilepsy
  • pregnancy or lactation
  • anti-viral treatment during the month before the inclusion
  • immunosuppressive treatment or use of other medication known to influence erythropoiesis during the month preceding the enrollment
  • need for blood transfusions within 12 weeks prior to enrollment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 1
Group Epo will receive anaemia treatment according to the Romanian Best Practice Guidelines recommendation, with once-weekly SC epoetinum beta during the first phase, then will be switched to receive SC once-fortnightly darbepoetinum. Anaemia treatment schedule will continue according to the Romanian Best Practice Guidelines recommendations, with the same dose. A conversion factor of 1:200 will be used.
switching from epoetinum beta once weekly to once-fortnightly darbepoetinum
Other Names:
  • Group Epo
Active Comparator: 2
Subjects in the Darbepo Group will receive anaemia treatment according to the Romanian Best Practice Guidelines recommendation, with once-fortnightly or once-monthly darbepoetin SC administration, continuing their previous schedule and will continue their previous schedule of anaemia treatment during the second phase of the study
continuation of the previous darbepoetinum administration schedule
Other Names:
  • Darbepo Group

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
- hemoglobin level during the study and - monthly ESA dose per dry body weight during the study
Time Frame: 80 weeks of the study
80 weeks of the study

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
- percentage of patients maintaining target Hb without increase in ESA dose - difference between the average Hb during second study phase period versus the first one and versus baseline phase
Time Frame: during the study
during the study

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Liliana Garneata, MD, PhD, Anemia Working Group
  • Study Chair: Gabriel Mircescu, Professor, Anemia Working Group
  • Principal Investigator: Carmen Barbulescu, MD, "Dr Carol Davila" NephroCare Dialysis Centre
  • Study Director: Alexandru Ciocalteu, Professor, "IHS" Dialysis Centre "Sf Ioan Nou" Clinical Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: Daniela Ciortea, MD, PhD, IHS Dialysis Centre, "Sf Ioan Nou" Clinical Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 29, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 30, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

October 31, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 22, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 21, 2017

Last Verified

December 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • AWG_03_07
  • 1246/ANM

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe