Safety and Efficacy of Intravitreal Fluocinolone Acetonide Implants in Patients With Diabetic Macular Edema

December 7, 2011 updated by: Bausch & Lomb Incorporated

A Randomized, Controlled Pilot Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Intravitreal Fluocinolone Acetonide (0.5mg and 2mg) Implants in Patients With Clinically Significant Diabetic Macular Edema

This is a 3-year randomized, dose masked, three-arm controlled, pilot study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the intravitreal FA implants (0.59mg and 2.1mg), when compared to laser photocoagulation in the treatment of patients with diabetic macular edema.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Hong Kong, China
        • The Chinese University of Hong Kong
    • Hyderabad
      • Banjara Hills, Hyderabad, India, 500 034
        • LV Prasad Eye Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects with type 1 or 2 diabetes.
  • Subjects with clinically significant macular edema as defined by the ETDRS.
  • A best corrected visual acuity between +0.30 and +1.00 logMAR (70 and 35 letters or approximately 20/40 to 20/200) as measured on an ETDRS chart.
  • Subjects with laser treatment status/history as follows: [1] Naïve to laser photocoagulation or Focal laser photocoagulation more than 16 weeks prior to screening or PRP more than 24 weeks prior to screening, [2] No laser scars within 500µm (4x the width of a retinal vein at the disc margin) of the central macula.
  • The subject's ocular media had to be sufficiently clear to allow for quality fundus photography.
  • If aphakic or pseudophakic, lens removal had to have occurred at least 40 weeks prior to screening.
  • Subjects had to be males or non-pregnant females of at least 18 years.
  • Subjects had to display the ability and willingness to comply with treatment, follow up process, and sign an Informed Consent Form.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects who have had previous grid macular photocoagulation for diffuse macular edema.
  • Presence of posterior hyaloid membrane, epiretinal membranes, fibrovascular proliferation, and vitreopapillary traction, which causes tractional distortion on the macula as demonstrated by OCT or funduscopy.
  • History of or current retinal detachment requiring surgical treatment or a scleral buckle.
  • Diabetic Retinopathy that required immediate PRP.
  • Ocular disease other than diabetic retinopathy that could confound the outcome of the study (e.g., age-related macular degeneration, drug toxicity, uveitis, hypertensive retinopathy, ischemic maculopathy, etc.).
  • Glaucoma, or history of glaucoma in either the study eye or the fellow eye.
  • Ocular hypertension, or history of ocular hypertension requiring IOP lowering treatment.
  • A media opacity that precludes visualization and/or diagnosis of the status of the eye.
  • Concurrent coumadin therapy or known bleeding diathesis.
  • Subjects requiring chronic systemic corticosteroid therapy or systemic immunosuppressive therapy to manage non-ocular disease.
  • Concurrent treatment with a new investigational drug.
  • Subjects with a best-corrected visual acuity worse than +1.0 logMAR (20/200 or 35 ETDRS letters) in the fellow eye.
  • Pregnant or lactating females.
  • Females of childbearing potential considering becoming pregnant during the course of the study and those not taking effective contraception/precautions to avoid pregnancy.
  • History of hypersensitivity to fluorescein, known allergies to steroids or any component of the intraocular device.
  • Subjects with photophobia that will preclude the ability to do fundus evaluations.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Fluocinolone acetonide 0.59 mg
0.59 mg fluocinolone acetonide intravitreal implant
0.59 mg
Other Names:
  • Retisert
Experimental: Fluocinolone acetonide 2.1 mg
2.1 mg fluocinolone acetonide intravitreal implant
2.1 mg
Active Comparator: Laser photocoagulation
standard of care laser photocoagulation
standard of care laser photocoagulation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Between group difference in mean visual acuity change (from baseline)
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Differences in the proportions of subjects in each treatment group experiencing changes in: the area of retinal thickening; retinal leakage and cystoid scores; grade of diabetic retinopathy
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year
Ocular adverse events, non-ocular adverse events, and intraocular pressure >/= 30 mm Hg
Time Frame: throughout study
throughout study

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Taraprasad Das, MD, LV Prasad Eye Institute
  • Principal Investigator: Dennis Lam Shun-Chiu, MD, Chinese University of Hong Kong

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2003

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2006

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2006

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 18, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 18, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

December 19, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 8, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 7, 2011

Last Verified

July 1, 2011

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe