Bronchoscopy vs. Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score Guided Approach in Suspected Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia (VAP)

September 25, 2023 updated by: Mayo Clinic

Bronchoscopy Versus Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score Guided Approach in Suspected Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia (VAP): Randomized Clinical Trial

The reported incidence of ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP) is 10 to 15 per 1,000 ventilator days. VAP leads to an excess cost exceeding $40,000 per patient and is associated with a crude mortality rate as high as 76%. The clinical criteria for the diagnosis of VAP have low specificity and may lead to unnecessary antibiotic use. The Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score (CPIS) and bronchoscopic approaches lower unnecessary antimicrobial use, antimicrobial resistance, and superinfection compared to the traditional clinical criteria.

Based on the available evidence and local microbiology data, we have developed a VAP management protocol guided by CPIS or bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) in adults with suspected VAP. These two approaches have not been compared against each other. Although the diagnostic studies in the CPIS guided approach are inexpensive and easily available, BAL has the potential to minimize the unnecessary use of antibiotics and reduce the development of drug resistant pathogens.

In this study, we propose to test the hypothesis that BAL leads to a reduction in antibiotic use compared to CPIS in patients with suspected VAP. The study design will be a randomized, clinical trial comparing CPIS versus BAL. The primary outcome measure will be antibiotic utilization. The secondary outcome measures will be mortality, morbidity, development of resistant pathogens and superinfection and infection related financial burden.

Completion of this trial will help us identify the best approach to avoid unnecessary antibiotic utilization and minimize the development of resistant pathogens (with their associated morbidity and mortality) in critically ill patients.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Phase 3

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age >= 18 years
  • Endotracheal intubation
  • Suspected VAP with:
  • New or progressive pulmonary infiltrates plus two of the following (In patients with pre-existing ALI or ARDS, physicians' suspicion of VAP with two of the listed criteria will be used.): Temperature > 38 C or < 36 C, WBC > 12,000/mL or < 4,000/mL, purulent endotracheal secretions.
  • Patient or legally authorized representative is able to sign Informed Consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prison inmates
  • Immunocompromised patients
  • Participation in another trial conflicting with the design of the current trial
  • Previous history of VAP during the same hospitalization
  • Previous participation in the current study
  • Concomitant non-pulmonary infection diagnosed within 3 days preceding the suspected VAP
  • Patient's primary care provider does not want subject to be enrolled in the study
  • Contraindications for bronchoscopy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: 1
Bronchoscopy
Bronchoscopy procedure
Active Comparator: 2
CPIS
Calculate CPIS

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
14-day antibiotic free days
Time Frame: Day 14 of enrolment
Day 14 of enrolment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Mortality
Time Frame: 28 days
28 days
Length of hospital stay
Time Frame: Hospital stay
Hospital stay
Daily organ failure score
Time Frame: 14 days
14 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Bekele Afessa, MD, Mayo Clinic

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 22, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 22, 2007

First Posted (Estimated)

January 8, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 26, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 25, 2023

Last Verified

September 1, 2023

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ventilator Associated Pneumonia

Clinical Trials on Bronchoscopy

3
Subscribe