Bronchoscopy Screening for High-risk Population of Lung Cancer With Severe Smoking With Negative LDCT Screen

May 28, 2020 updated by: Jiayuan Sun

Bronchoscopy Screening of High-risk Population of Lung Cancer With Severe Smoking

Based on the previous work of LDCT screening, in order to improve the screening rate of central lung cancer for LDCT negative and severe smokers, the investigators plan to conduct China's first large-scale fluorescent bronchoscopy screening test.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

CT scan is a commonly used method for clinical screening for early lung cancer, but research shows that LDCT scan has a higher detection rate for peripheral lesions (often adenocarcinoma), and a lower detection rate for central lung cancer (mostly squamous cell carcinoma). Fluorescent bronchoscopy uses the principle of differentiating fluorescence in different tissues to distinguish normal parts from diseased parts. It is often used for screening of central early lung cancer.Based on the results of the investigator's previous research, the investigators plan to conduct a second round of community screening-bronchoscopy screening, and perform white light bronchoscopy and autofluorescence bronchoscopy screening for high-risk groups of lung cancer with heavy smoking (≥400 years) and no obvious lung nodules.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

400

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Shanghai
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China, 200030
        • Recruiting
        • Shanghai Chest Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

45 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age 45-75 years;
  2. have a smoking history of ≥20 pack years; if participants quit smoking, it should be <15 years;
  3. Chest LDCT examination within one and a half years without obvious abnormalities or calcified nodules or non-calcified nodules and no signs of malignancy

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Non-smokers or mild smokers;
  2. There are contraindications to bronchoscopy, such as active hemoptysis, unstable angina pectoris, coagulation dysfunction, anesthesia allergy, etc .;
  3. Refusing to sign informed consent;
  4. The operator believes that the patient has other conditions that are not suitable for bronchoscopy.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Screening
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: white light bronchoscopy and autofluorescence bronchoscopy
White light bronchoscopy and autofluorescence bronchoscopy were carried out for people at high risk for lung cancer with heavy smoking (smoking history> 400 years).Biopsy was taken for abnormal bronchial mucosa.
White light bronchoscopy and autofluorescence bronchoscopy were carried out,and Take a biopsy for abnormal bronchial mucosa

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The effect of AFB and WLB screening (the positive rate of lung cancer)on LDCT screening negative at high risk for lung cancer was analyzed.
Time Frame: one year
ALB and WLB were screened for LDCT screening for lung cancer negative severe smokers. The effect of AFB and WLB screening on LDCT screening negative lung cancer at high risk was analyzed.
one year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The diagnostic efficacy of WLB and AFB in lung cancer was compared
Time Frame: one year
The diagnostic efficacy of WLB and AFB in lung cancer was compared by comparing abnormalities under WLB and AFB and histopathology respectively.
one year
The independent risk factors of lung cancer in high-risk groups were Identified.
Time Frame: one year
Univariate and multivariate Logistic regression analysis was carried out to screen the independent risk factors of lung cancer in high-risk groups.
one year
RGB(red-green-blue) chrominance spatial differences in normal sites, low-grade preinvasive (LGD), high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia, and invasive cancer was analyzed.
Time Frame: one year
RGB(red-green-blue) chrominance spatial differences of AFB in normal sites, low-grade preinvasive (LGD), high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia, and invasive cancer was analyzed.
one year
Blood was drawn for liquid molecular detection to identify the molecular markers associated with lung cancer.
Time Frame: one year
Blood was drawn for liquid molecular detection to identify the molecular markers associated with lung cancer.
one year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 26, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 3, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 28, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

June 4, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 4, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 28, 2020

Last Verified

January 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heavy Smoking

Clinical Trials on white light bronchoscopy & autofluorescence bronchoscopy

Subscribe