Total Hip Replacement With the Answer® Hip Stem and Ranawat/Burnstein® Shell Using Simplex® or Palacos® Bone Cement

January 26, 2017 updated by: Biomet Orthopedics, LLC

Total Hip Replacement With the Answer® Hip Stem and Ranawat/Burnstein® Acetabular Shell Using Simplex® or Palacos® Bone Cement

The purpose of this study is to document the clinical outcomes of several devices used in total hip replacement, including the Answer® hip stem, the Ranawat/Burnstein® acetabular shell, and Simplex® or Palacos® bone cement.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The purpose of this study is to document the clinical outcomes of several devices used in total hip replacement, including the Answer® hip stem, the Ranawat/Burnstein® acetabular shell, and Simplex® or Palacos® bone cement. It was desirable to see if there were any differences in the outcomes of two different types of bone cement in application.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

400

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Indiana
      • Warsaw, Indiana, United States, 46581
        • Biomet Orthopedics, LLC

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Noninflammatory degenerative joint disease including osteoarthritis and avascular necrosis
  • Rheumatoid arthritis
  • Correction of functional deformity
  • Treatment of non-union, femoral neck fracture, and trochanteric fractures of the proximal femur with head involvement, unmanageable using other techniques

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Infection, sepsis, and osteomyelitis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Answer® hip stem with Simplex Cement
Femoral stem replacement with Answer® hip stem & Simplex Bone Cement
Total hip replacement using Palacos® bone cement, the Answer® hip stem and the Ranawat/Burnstein® acetabular shell.
Other Names:
  • Answer Hip Stem
  • Simplex Bone Cement
Total hip replacement using Simplex® bone cement, the Answer® hip stem and the Ranawat/Burnstein® acetabular shell.
Other Names:
  • Answer Hip Stem
  • Palacos Bone Cement
Active Comparator: Answer® hip stem with Palacos Cement
Femoral stem replacement with Answer® hip stem & Palacos Bone Cement
Total hip replacement using Palacos® bone cement, the Answer® hip stem and the Ranawat/Burnstein® acetabular shell.
Other Names:
  • Answer Hip Stem
  • Simplex Bone Cement
Total hip replacement using Simplex® bone cement, the Answer® hip stem and the Ranawat/Burnstein® acetabular shell.
Other Names:
  • Answer Hip Stem
  • Palacos Bone Cement

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Harris Hip Score
Time Frame: 10 Years Post-Operative
The Harris Hip Score is detailed below as a range. 100 being the highest score, and 0 being the lowest score. 90-100 is considered "Excellent." 80-89 is considered "Good." 70-79 is considered "Fair." Less than 70 is considered "Poor."
10 Years Post-Operative

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Harris Hip Score Pain
Time Frame: Pre-Operative, 6 months, 1 year, 2 year, 4 year, 6 year, 8 year, 10 year
Harris Hip Score Pain is detailed below as mean score for the Harris Hip Score Pain question. 44 being the highest score, and 0 being the lowest score. 44 is considered "None/Ignores." 40 is considered "Slight/Occasional." 30 is considered "Mild." 20 is considered "Moderate." 10 is considered "Marked." 0 is considered "Totally Disabled."
Pre-Operative, 6 months, 1 year, 2 year, 4 year, 6 year, 8 year, 10 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Ken Beres, MD, Zimmer Biomet

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2002

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 19, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 2, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

January 9, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 27, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 26, 2017

Last Verified

January 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 101-U-011

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Osteoarthritis, Hip

Clinical Trials on Answer® hip stem

3
Subscribe