- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT00957658
Accolade® TMZF® Hip Stem Outcomes Study
Accolade® TMZF® Study A Prospective, Post-market, Non-randomized, Multi-center Evaluation of the Accolade® TMZF® Hip Stem
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
California
-
Newport Beach, California, United States, 92660
- Newport Orthopaedic Institute
-
San Diego, California, United States, 92120
- Alvarado Ortho Medical Group
-
-
Florida
-
Boynton Beach, Florida, United States, 33435
- Orthopaedic Surgery Associates
-
Bradenton, Florida, United States, 34209
- Coastal Orthopaedics
-
Jacksonville, Florida, United States, 32224
- Mayo Clinic Jacksonville
-
-
Georgia
-
Columbus, Georgia, United States, 31908
- Hughston Clinic P.A.
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Duxbury, Massachusetts, United States, 02332
- Plymouth Bay Ortho Association
-
Springfield, Massachusetts, United States, 01107
- New England Orthopaedic Surgeons
-
-
New York
-
Harrison, New York, United States, 10528
- Specialty Orthopaedics
-
-
South Carolina
-
Spartanburg, South Carolina, United States, 23907
- Spartanburg Regional Medical Center
-
-
Washington
-
Tacoma, Washington, United States, 98402
- Northwest Orthopaedic Institute
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patient is a candidate for a primary total hip replacement.
- Patient has primary diagnosis of osteoarthritis (OA).
- Male and non-pregnant female patients ages 18 to 90.
- Patient has signed an Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved, study specific Informed Patient Consent Form.
- Patient willing and able to comply with postoperative scheduled clinical and radiographic evaluations and rehabilitation.
- Patient capable of undergoing a pre-op central DXA (dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry) scan for a bone mineral density (BMD) reading.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patient has an active infection within the affected hip joint.
- Patient requires a revision surgery of a previously implanted total hip arthroplasty or hip fusion to the affected joint.
- Patient who is morbidly obese, Body Mass Index (BMI) > 40.
- Patient has a neuromuscular or neurosensory deficiency, which limits ability to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the device.
- Patient has the following diagnosed systemic diseases: Paget's disease, renal osteodystrophy, lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, metabolic bone disease and sickle cell anemia.
- Patient is immunologically suppressed or receiving chronic steroids more than 30 days. Patients receiving oral or IV steroids within one month of surgery.
- Patient is a prisoner.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: NA
- Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
- Masking: NONE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
OTHER: Accolade® TMZF® Hip Stem
Accolade® TMZF® Hip Stem Study Device
|
Accolade® TMZF® Hip Stem
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
---|---|
Combined Percentage (%) Cases Without Aseptic Loosening, Intraoperative Femoral Fracture or Thigh Pain
Time Frame: 2 years
|
2 years
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Percentage (%) of Hip Stems With Aseptic Loosening
Time Frame: 5 years
|
Aseptic loosening is defined as a continuous radiolucency that surrounds the entire femoral stem porous coating-bone interface and that measures greater than 2 mm in thickness, and 5 mm or more of stem subsidence.
Continuous radiolucency must be present in Zones 1, 2, 6 and 7 of the AP radiographic view and/or present in Zones 8, 9, 13 and 14 of the M/L radiographic view.
|
5 years
|
Revision/Removal Rates
Time Frame: 2 and 5 years
|
The percentage (%) of hips with revision or removal of any total hip replacement component (acetabular cup, femoral stem or femoral head) is reported at the 2 and 5 year postoperative intervals.
|
2 and 5 years
|
Change in Harris Hip Score (HHS)
Time Frame: Preoperative, 2 and 5 years
|
The change in HHS is reported by comparing the mean preoperative, 2 and 5 year postoperative scores.
Scores can range from 0 to 100 with 0 being the worst and 100 being the best score.
A score of 80-100 is considered good-excellent and a score of less than or equal to 79 is considered fair-poor.
90-100 = excellent, 80-89 = good, 70-79 = fair, 0-69 = poor.
|
Preoperative, 2 and 5 years
|
Change in SF-12 Score
Time Frame: Preoperative, 2 and 5 years
|
The change in SF-12 is reported by comparing the mean preoperative, 2 and 5 year postoperative scores.The SF-12 Health Survey is a 12-item patient completed questionnaire to measure general health and well-being.
It includes a physical and mental status component score; each ranging from 0-100.
Low values represent a poor health state and high values represent a good health state.
|
Preoperative, 2 and 5 years
|
Change in Lower Extremity Activity Scale (LEAS) Score
Time Frame: Preoperative, 2 and 5 years
|
The change in LEAS is reported by comparing the mean preoperative, 2 and 5 year postoperative scores.The LEAS is completed by the participant to assess activity level.
Activity levels were ordered in terms of intensity from 1 to 18, with 18 indicating the highest activity level.
The mean preoperative, 2 and 5 year scores are reported to assess improvement.
|
Preoperative, 2 and 5 years
|
PEQ (Patient Expectation Questionnaire) Overall Satisfaction
Time Frame: 6 months, 1 year and 2 years
|
The PEQ is a study sponsor generated outcomes form. It is a one page questionnaire completed by the participant to assess lifestyle recovery post-surgery. Preoperatively, participants are asked to identify 3 of 12 different expectations that they most want to achieve after hip surgery. At 6 months,1 year and 2 years post-surgery participants evaluated the 3 expectations they identified and assessed their overall satisfaction and percent achievement. EXPECTATIONS KEY: Participate in recreational activities (dancing,traveling,gardening) Exercise or participate in sports Independently perform household chores/daily routine Easily change position,sit to stand/stand to sit Remove need for cane crutch or walker Use stairs normally step by step Ability to sleep through night Maintain social activites,caring for someone,playing with children Use public transportation or drive Maintain psychological well-being Maintain sexual activity Maintain employment |
6 months, 1 year and 2 years
|
PEQ (Patient Evaluation Questionnaire) Percent Achievement
Time Frame: 6 months, 1 year, 2 years
|
The PEQ is a study sponsor generated outcomes form. It is a one page questionnaire completed by the participant to assess lifestyle recovery post-surgery. Preoperatively, participants are asked to identify 3 of 12 different expectations that they most want to achieve after hip surgery. At 6 months,1 year and 2 years post-surgery participants evaluated the 3 expectations they identified and assessed their overall satisfaction and percent achievement. EXPECTATIONS KEY: Participate in recreational activities (dancing,traveling,gardening) Exercise or participate in sports Independently perform household chores/daily routine Easily change position,sit to stand/stand to sit Remove need for cane crutch or walker Use stairs normally step by step Ability to sleep through night Maintain social activites,caring for someone,playing with children Use public transportation or drive Maintain psychological well-being Maintain sexual activity Maintain employment |
6 months, 1 year, 2 years
|
Acetabular Insert Wear
Time Frame: 5 years
|
The linear wear rate of the polyethylene acetabular insert is measured radiographically and reported at 5 years.
|
5 years
|
Wrist DXA Scan Analysis
Time Frame: 5 years
|
DXA is a bone densitometry scan that measures bone mineral density and assigns a T-score.
This score shows the amount of bone a patient has compared with a young adult of the same gender with peak bone mass.
A score above -1 is considered normal.
A score between -1 and -2.5 is classified as osteopenia (low bone mass).
A score below -2.5 is defined as osteoporosis.
|
5 years
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Chair: Robert Krushell, MD, Baystate Medical Center
- Principal Investigator: Robert Zann, MD, Boca Raton Community Hospital
- Principal Investigator: Steven Gausewitz, MD, Hoag Hospital
- Principal Investigator: R. Scott Oliver, MD, Jordan Hospital
- Principal Investigator: Anthony Sanchez, MD, Spartanburg Regional Health Service District, Inc
- Principal Investigator: Mark Visk, MD, Spartanburg Regional Health Service District, Inc
- Principal Investigator: Steven Teeny, MD, St. Clare Hospital
- Principal Investigator: Alan Valadie, MD, Coastal Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
- Principal Investigator: Steven Zelicof, MD, Sound Shore Medical Center of Westchester
- Principal Investigator: James Bates, MD, Alvarado Hospital
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ESTIMATE)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- 59
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
-
Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi OnlusCompletedArthroplasty, Replacement, Knee | Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipItaly
-
Bornholms RegionskommuneCompletedArthroplasty, Replacement, Knee | Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipDenmark
-
Campus Bio-Medico UniversityRecruitingArthroplasty, Replacement, Knee | Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipItaly
-
SCRI Development Innovations, LLCWithdrawnArthroplasty, Replacement, Knee | Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipUnited States
-
Sunnybrook Health Sciences CentreActive, not recruitingArthroplasty, Replacement, Knee | Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipCanada
-
University of British ColumbiaThe Arthritis Society, Canada; Centre for Aging SMART; Centre for Advancing Health...Not yet recruitingArthroplasty, Replacement, Knee | Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipCanada
-
University Hospital, Strasbourg, FranceRecruitingArthroplasty, Hip Replacement | Arthroplasty, Knee ReplacementFrance
-
Henry Ford Health SystemConsumer Sleep SolutionsNot yet recruitingArthroplasty, Replacement, Knee | Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipUnited States
-
Haute Ecole de Santé VaudCompletedArthroplasty, Replacement, Knee | Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipSwitzerland
-
The Cleveland ClinicZimmer Biomet; Accelero Health Partners, LLCCompletedArthroplasty, Replacement, Knee | Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipUnited States
Clinical Trials on Accolade® TMZF® Hip Stem
-
Encore Medical, L.P.TerminatedOsteoarthritis | Rheumatoid Arthritis | Avascular NecrosisUnited States
-
Biomet Orthopedics, LLCTerminatedOsteoarthritis, Hip | Traumatic Arthritis of HipUnited States
-
Hip Innovation TechnologyRecruitingOsteoarthritis, Hip | Avascular Necrosis of Hip | Degenerative Joint Disease | Traumatic Arthropathy-HipUnited States
-
Stryker OrthopaedicsTerminatedArthroplasty, Replacement, HipNetherlands
-
MicroPort Orthopedics Inc.Active, not recruitingJoint DiseaseUnited Kingdom
-
MicroPort Orthopedics Inc.Enrolling by invitationJoint DiseasesUnited States
-
MicroPort Orthopedics Inc.Active, not recruitingJoint DiseaseCanada
-
MicroPort Orthopedics Inc.Terminated
-
Aesculap AGActive, not recruiting
-
Aesculap AGActive, not recruitingRheumatoid Arthritis | Hip Dysplasia | Fractures, Hip | Necrosis, Femur Head | Coxarthrosis; Primary | Coxarthrosis; Post-TraumaticGermany