Accolade® TMZF® Hip Stem Outcomes Study

July 7, 2017 updated by: Stryker Orthopaedics

Accolade® TMZF® Study A Prospective, Post-market, Non-randomized, Multi-center Evaluation of the Accolade® TMZF® Hip Stem

The purpose of this study is to evaluate clinical and radiographic outcome data in patients implanted with the Accolade® TMZF® femoral stem.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

A prospective, post-market, multi-centered clinical evaluation of the Accolade® TMZF® hip stem device. All patients enrolled will receive the study device. All study patients will undergo a preoperative central Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan to determine bone mineral density (BMD) values.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

241

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Newport Beach, California, United States, 92660
        • Newport Orthopaedic Institute
      • San Diego, California, United States, 92120
        • Alvarado Ortho Medical Group
    • Florida
      • Boynton Beach, Florida, United States, 33435
        • Orthopaedic Surgery Associates
      • Bradenton, Florida, United States, 34209
        • Coastal Orthopaedics
      • Jacksonville, Florida, United States, 32224
        • Mayo Clinic Jacksonville
    • Georgia
      • Columbus, Georgia, United States, 31908
        • Hughston Clinic P.A.
    • Massachusetts
      • Duxbury, Massachusetts, United States, 02332
        • Plymouth Bay Ortho Association
      • Springfield, Massachusetts, United States, 01107
        • New England Orthopaedic Surgeons
    • New York
      • Harrison, New York, United States, 10528
        • Specialty Orthopaedics
    • South Carolina
      • Spartanburg, South Carolina, United States, 23907
        • Spartanburg Regional Medical Center
    • Washington
      • Tacoma, Washington, United States, 98402
        • Northwest Orthopaedic Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 90 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient is a candidate for a primary total hip replacement.
  2. Patient has primary diagnosis of osteoarthritis (OA).
  3. Male and non-pregnant female patients ages 18 to 90.
  4. Patient has signed an Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved, study specific Informed Patient Consent Form.
  5. Patient willing and able to comply with postoperative scheduled clinical and radiographic evaluations and rehabilitation.
  6. Patient capable of undergoing a pre-op central DXA (dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry) scan for a bone mineral density (BMD) reading.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient has an active infection within the affected hip joint.
  2. Patient requires a revision surgery of a previously implanted total hip arthroplasty or hip fusion to the affected joint.
  3. Patient who is morbidly obese, Body Mass Index (BMI) > 40.
  4. Patient has a neuromuscular or neurosensory deficiency, which limits ability to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the device.
  5. Patient has the following diagnosed systemic diseases: Paget's disease, renal osteodystrophy, lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, metabolic bone disease and sickle cell anemia.
  6. Patient is immunologically suppressed or receiving chronic steroids more than 30 days. Patients receiving oral or IV steroids within one month of surgery.
  7. Patient is a prisoner.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
OTHER: Accolade® TMZF® Hip Stem
Accolade® TMZF® Hip Stem Study Device
Accolade® TMZF® Hip Stem

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Combined Percentage (%) Cases Without Aseptic Loosening, Intraoperative Femoral Fracture or Thigh Pain
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage (%) of Hip Stems With Aseptic Loosening
Time Frame: 5 years
Aseptic loosening is defined as a continuous radiolucency that surrounds the entire femoral stem porous coating-bone interface and that measures greater than 2 mm in thickness, and 5 mm or more of stem subsidence. Continuous radiolucency must be present in Zones 1, 2, 6 and 7 of the AP radiographic view and/or present in Zones 8, 9, 13 and 14 of the M/L radiographic view.
5 years
Revision/Removal Rates
Time Frame: 2 and 5 years
The percentage (%) of hips with revision or removal of any total hip replacement component (acetabular cup, femoral stem or femoral head) is reported at the 2 and 5 year postoperative intervals.
2 and 5 years
Change in Harris Hip Score (HHS)
Time Frame: Preoperative, 2 and 5 years
The change in HHS is reported by comparing the mean preoperative, 2 and 5 year postoperative scores. Scores can range from 0 to 100 with 0 being the worst and 100 being the best score. A score of 80-100 is considered good-excellent and a score of less than or equal to 79 is considered fair-poor. 90-100 = excellent, 80-89 = good, 70-79 = fair, 0-69 = poor.
Preoperative, 2 and 5 years
Change in SF-12 Score
Time Frame: Preoperative, 2 and 5 years
The change in SF-12 is reported by comparing the mean preoperative, 2 and 5 year postoperative scores.The SF-12 Health Survey is a 12-item patient completed questionnaire to measure general health and well-being. It includes a physical and mental status component score; each ranging from 0-100. Low values represent a poor health state and high values represent a good health state.
Preoperative, 2 and 5 years
Change in Lower Extremity Activity Scale (LEAS) Score
Time Frame: Preoperative, 2 and 5 years
The change in LEAS is reported by comparing the mean preoperative, 2 and 5 year postoperative scores.The LEAS is completed by the participant to assess activity level. Activity levels were ordered in terms of intensity from 1 to 18, with 18 indicating the highest activity level. The mean preoperative, 2 and 5 year scores are reported to assess improvement.
Preoperative, 2 and 5 years
PEQ (Patient Expectation Questionnaire) Overall Satisfaction
Time Frame: 6 months, 1 year and 2 years

The PEQ is a study sponsor generated outcomes form. It is a one page questionnaire completed by the participant to assess lifestyle recovery post-surgery. Preoperatively, participants are asked to identify 3 of 12 different expectations that they most want to achieve after hip surgery. At 6 months,1 year and 2 years post-surgery participants evaluated the 3 expectations they identified and assessed their overall satisfaction and percent achievement.

EXPECTATIONS KEY:

Participate in recreational activities (dancing,traveling,gardening)

Exercise or participate in sports

Independently perform household chores/daily routine

Easily change position,sit to stand/stand to sit

Remove need for cane crutch or walker

Use stairs normally step by step

Ability to sleep through night

Maintain social activites,caring for someone,playing with children

Use public transportation or drive

Maintain psychological well-being

Maintain sexual activity

Maintain employment

6 months, 1 year and 2 years
PEQ (Patient Evaluation Questionnaire) Percent Achievement
Time Frame: 6 months, 1 year, 2 years

The PEQ is a study sponsor generated outcomes form. It is a one page questionnaire completed by the participant to assess lifestyle recovery post-surgery. Preoperatively, participants are asked to identify 3 of 12 different expectations that they most want to achieve after hip surgery. At 6 months,1 year and 2 years post-surgery participants evaluated the 3 expectations they identified and assessed their overall satisfaction and percent achievement.

EXPECTATIONS KEY:

Participate in recreational activities (dancing,traveling,gardening)

Exercise or participate in sports

Independently perform household chores/daily routine

Easily change position,sit to stand/stand to sit

Remove need for cane crutch or walker

Use stairs normally step by step

Ability to sleep through night

Maintain social activites,caring for someone,playing with children

Use public transportation or drive

Maintain psychological well-being

Maintain sexual activity

Maintain employment

6 months, 1 year, 2 years
Acetabular Insert Wear
Time Frame: 5 years
The linear wear rate of the polyethylene acetabular insert is measured radiographically and reported at 5 years.
5 years
Wrist DXA Scan Analysis
Time Frame: 5 years
DXA is a bone densitometry scan that measures bone mineral density and assigns a T-score. This score shows the amount of bone a patient has compared with a young adult of the same gender with peak bone mass. A score above -1 is considered normal. A score between -1 and -2.5 is classified as osteopenia (low bone mass). A score below -2.5 is defined as osteoporosis.
5 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Robert Krushell, MD, Baystate Medical Center
  • Principal Investigator: Robert Zann, MD, Boca Raton Community Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: Steven Gausewitz, MD, Hoag Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: R. Scott Oliver, MD, Jordan Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: Anthony Sanchez, MD, Spartanburg Regional Health Service District, Inc
  • Principal Investigator: Mark Visk, MD, Spartanburg Regional Health Service District, Inc
  • Principal Investigator: Steven Teeny, MD, St. Clare Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: Alan Valadie, MD, Coastal Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Principal Investigator: Steven Zelicof, MD, Sound Shore Medical Center of Westchester
  • Principal Investigator: James Bates, MD, Alvarado Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2006

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

May 1, 2011

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

May 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 10, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 11, 2009

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

August 12, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

August 14, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 7, 2017

Last Verified

July 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 59

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip

Clinical Trials on Accolade® TMZF® Hip Stem

3
Subscribe