Comparison of the Subjective Well-being and Tolerability of Quetiapine XR to Risperidone (RECOVER)

October 2, 2012 updated by: AstraZeneca

A One-Year Randomized, Prospective, Parallel, Open Comparison of Subjective Well-being in Schizophrenic Out-patients Treated With Quetiapine XR (SEROQUEL XR™) or Oral Risperidone at Flexible Dose in a Naturalistic Setting

The trial is designed to assess the long term subjective well-being in schizophrenic outpatients treated with quetiapine XR (extended release) or oral risperidone at flexible dose in a naturalistic setting over a period of one year. Secondary outcome measures have been selected for helping in the differentiation of the compared atypical antipsychotics. The primary objective of this study is to demonstrate the non-inferiority of quetiapine XR to risperidone assessed at month 6 in terms of responder rate using the self-report instrument SWN-K

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

798

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Assebroek, Belgium
        • Research Site
      • Hasselt, Belgium
        • Research Site
      • Liege, Belgium
        • Research Site
      • Montignies-sur-sambre, Belgium
        • Research Site
      • Roeselare, Belgium
        • Research Site
      • Sint-denijs-westrem, Belgium
        • Research Site
      • Tournai, Belgium
        • Research Site
      • Botucatu, Brazil
        • Research Site
      • Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
        • Research Site
    • BA
      • Salvador, BA, Brazil
        • Research Site
    • CE
      • Fortaleza, CE, Brazil
        • Research Site
    • GO
      • Aparecida de Goiania, GO, Brazil
        • Research Site
    • Minas Gerais
      • Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
        • Research Site
    • PE
      • Recife, PE, Brazil
        • Research Site
    • PR
      • Curitiba, PR, Brazil
        • Research Site
    • RS
      • Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
        • Research Site
    • SP
      • Itapira, SP, Brazil
        • Research Site
      • Ribeirao Preto, SP, Brazil
        • Research Site
      • Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
        • Research Site
      • Sorocaba, SP, Brazil
        • Research Site
      • Pazardjik, Bulgaria
        • Research Site
      • Pleven, Bulgaria
        • Research Site
      • Plovdiv, Bulgaria
        • Research Site
      • Sofia, Bulgaria
        • Research Site
      • Stara Zagora, Bulgaria
        • Research Site
      • Varna, Bulgaria
        • Research Site
    • Veliko Tarnovo
      • Cerova Koria Village, Veliko Tarnovo, Bulgaria
        • Research Site
    • San Jose
      • Barrio Los Yoses, San Jose, Costa Rica
        • Research Site
      • Curridabat, San Jose, Costa Rica
        • Research Site
      • Guadalupe, San Jose, Costa Rica
        • Research Site
      • Helsinki, Finland
        • Research Site
      • Kitee, Finland
        • Research Site
      • Kuopio, Finland
        • Research Site
      • Lapua, Finland
        • Research Site
      • Pori, Finland
        • Research Site
      • Raahe, Finland
        • Research Site
      • Rovaniemi, Finland
        • Research Site
      • Tampere, Finland
        • Research Site
      • Turku, Finland
        • Research Site
      • Bad Saarow, Germany
        • Research Site
      • Berlin, Germany
        • Research Site
      • Bielefeld, Germany
        • Research Site
      • Bochum, Germany
        • Research Site
      • Butzbach, Germany
        • Research Site
      • Darmstadt, Germany
        • Research Site
      • Duisburg, Germany
        • Research Site
      • Gelsenkirchen, Germany
        • Research Site
      • Grevenbroich, Germany
        • Research Site
      • Hamburg, Germany
        • Research Site
      • Hattingen, Germany
        • Research Site
      • Hildesheim, Germany
        • Research Site
      • Koln, Germany
        • Research Site
      • Konigsbruck, Germany
        • Research Site
      • Mittweida, Germany
        • Research Site
      • Munchen, Germany
        • Research Site
      • Oranienburg, Germany
        • Research Site
      • Siegen, Germany
        • Research Site
      • Stralsund, Germany
        • Research Site
      • Wismar, Germany
        • Research Site
      • Ancona, Italy
        • Research Site
      • Pompei, Italy
        • Research Site
    • BA
      • Andria, BA, Italy
        • Research Site
    • BL
      • Feltre, BL, Italy
        • Research Site
    • CE
      • Maddaloni, CE, Italy
        • Research Site
    • FR
      • Sora, FR, Italy
        • Research Site
    • GE
      • Genova, GE, Italy
        • Research Site
    • MI
      • Milano, MI, Italy
        • Research Site
    • PG
      • Perugia, PG, Italy
        • Research Site
    • PR
      • Fidenza, PR, Italy
        • Research Site
      • Parma, PR, Italy
        • Research Site
    • RC
      • Palmi, RC, Italy
        • Research Site
    • RN
      • Rimini, RN, Italy
        • Research Site
    • SA
      • Salerno, SA, Italy
        • Research Site
    • SS
      • Sassari, SS, Italy
        • Research Site
    • VE
      • Chioggia, VE, Italy
        • Research Site
      • Guadalajara Jalisco, Mexico
        • Research Site
      • Mexico, Mexico
        • Research Site
      • Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, Mexico
        • Research Site
      • SLP, Mexico
        • Research Site
      • Yucatan, Mexico
        • Research Site
    • D.F
      • Mexico, D.F, Mexico
        • Research Site
    • D.f.
      • Mexico, D.f., Mexico
        • Research Site
      • Abraveses, Portugal
        • Research Site
      • Braga, Portugal
        • Research Site
      • Coimbra, Portugal
        • Research Site
      • Lisboa, Portugal
        • Research Site
      • Porto, Portugal
        • Research Site
      • Santarem, Portugal
        • Research Site
      • Bucharest, Romania
        • Research Site
      • Craiova, Romania
        • Research Site
      • Galati, Romania
        • Research Site
      • Sibiu, Romania
        • Research Site
    • Arges
      • Pitesti, Arges, Romania
        • Research Site
      • Kazan, Russian Federation
        • Research Site
      • Moscow, Russian Federation
        • Research Site
      • St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
        • Research Site
    • Russia
      • Moscow, Russia, Russian Federation
        • Research Site
    • Andalucia
      • Jaen, Andalucia, Spain
        • Research Site
      • Malaga, Andalucia, Spain
        • Research Site
      • Sevilla, Andalucia, Spain
        • Research Site
    • Asturias
      • Sama de Langreo, Asturias, Spain
        • Research Site
    • Castilla Leon
      • Salamanca, Castilla Leon, Spain
        • Research Site
      • Zamora, Castilla Leon, Spain
        • Research Site
    • Cataluna
      • Mataro (barcelona), Cataluna, Spain
        • Research Site
    • Comunidad Valenciana
      • Elche (alicante), Comunidad Valenciana, Spain
        • Research Site
      • San Juan de Alicante, Comunidad Valenciana, Spain
        • Research Site
    • Comunidad de Madrid
      • Madrid, Comunidad de Madrid, Spain
        • Research Site
    • Galicia
      • Vigo, Galicia, Spain
        • Research Site
    • Pais Vasco
      • Zamudio (vizcaya), Pais Vasco, Spain
        • Research Site
      • WIL, Switzerland
        • Research Site
    • Waadt
      • Prilly, Waadt, Switzerland
        • Research Site
      • Ankara, Turkey
        • Research Site
      • Elazig, Turkey
        • Research Site
      • Istanbul, Turkey
        • Research Site
      • Izmir, Turkey
        • Research Site
      • Manisa, Turkey
        • Research Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Treated for symptomatic schizophrenia (DSM-IV-TR codes: 295.10, 295.20, 295.30,295.60, 295.90) or schizoaffective disorder (DSM-IV-TR code:295.70) or schizophreniform disorder (DSM-IV-TR code: 295.40). Patients with co-morbid depressive symptoms may be enrolled
  • Patient with first episode of the above mentioned disease (item 3) or patient requiring a medication change for clinical reasons (effectiveness, tolerability, compliance, patient preference), i.e. switch from typical to atypical neuroleptics, switch from other atypical neuroleptics, excluding patients treated with risperidone or quetiapine at the time of enrolment.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with a baseline SWN-K total score of >75
  • Patients with previous treatment with risperidone or quetiapine may be enrolled if change of treatment has not been dictated by major lack of tolerability and efficacy and if date of last dose has been at least 3 months prior to enrolment.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Risperidone
Oral, once daily, tablets of 2 mg to 6 mg
Other Names:
  • Risperdal
Experimental: Quetiapine XR
Oral, once daily, tablets of 400 mg to 800 mg
Other Names:
  • Seroquel XR

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Responder Rate at Month 6 in the Per Protocol Population Using the Subjective Well-being Under Neuroleptics Scale, Short Version (SWN-K) Total Score
Time Frame: 6 months
The SWN-K is comprised of 20 questions, rated on a 6-point scale from 1 (not at all) to 6 (very much). Scores range from 20 to 120, with higher scores implying higher subjective well-being. A responder is defined as a subject with an increase of 10 points or 20% from baseline in SWN-K total score (non-inferiority limit of -9.7% in responder rate)
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Mean Subjective Well-Being Under Neuroleptic Treatment Scale (SWN-K) Total Score at Month 12 in the Per Protocol Population
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 12
The SWN-K is comprised of 20 questions, each of which is rated using a 6-point scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 6 (very much). Possible scores range from 20 to 120, with higher scores implying higher subjective well-being.
Baseline and Month 12
Change From Baseline in Mean Subjective Well-Being Under Neuroleptic Treatment Scale (SWN-K) Total Score at Month 12 in the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 12
The SWN-K is comprised of 20 questions, each of which is rated using a 6-point scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 6 (very much). Possible scores range from 20 to 120, with higher scores implying higher subjective well-being.
Baseline and Month 12
Change From Baseline in the Subjective Well-Being Under Neuroleptic Treatment Scale (SWN-K) Subscale Score: Physical Functioning at Month 12 in the ITT Population.
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 months
The SWN-K total score is the sum of 5 subscores (4 questions each): physical functioning, social integration, mental functioning, self-control, and emotional regulation. The subscores are rated using a 6-point scale (the higher the grade, the better the response). Possible subscores range from 4 to 24.
Baseline and 12 months
Change From Baseline in the Subjective Well-Being Under Neuroleptic Treatment Scale (SWN-K) Subscale Score: Social Integration at Month 12 in the ITT Population.
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 months
The SWN-K total score is the sum of 5 subscores (4 questions each): physical functioning, social integration, mental functioning, self-control, and emotional regulation. The subscores are rated using a 6-point scale (the higher the grade, the better the response). Possible subscores range from 4 to 24.
Baseline and 12 months
Change From Baseline in the Subjective Well-Being Under Neuroleptic Treatment Scale (SWN-K) Subscale Score: Mental Functioning at Month 12 in the ITT Population.
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 months
The SWN-K total score is the sum of 5 subscores (4 questions each): physical functioning, social integration, mental functioning, self-control, and emotional regulation. The subscores are rated using a 6-point scale (the higher the grade, the better the response). Possible subscores range from 4 to 24.
Baseline and 12 months
Change From Baseline in the Subjective Well-Being Under Neuroleptic Treatment Scale (SWN-K) Subscale Score: Self-control at Month 12 in the ITT Population.
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 months
The SWN-K total score is the sum of 5 subscores (4 questions each): physical functioning, social integration, mental functioning, self-control, and emotional regulation. The subscores are rated using a 6-point scale (the higher the grade, the better the response). Possible subscores range from 4 to 24.
Baseline and 12 months
Change From Baseline in the Subjective Well-Being Under Neuroleptic Treatment Scale (SWN-K) Subscale Score: Emotional Regulation at Month 12 in the ITT Population.
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 months
The SWN-K total score is the sum of 5 subscores (4 questions each): physical functioning, social integration, mental functioning, self-control, and emotional regulation. The subscores are rated using a 6-point scale (the higher the grade, the better the response). Possible subscores range from 4 to 24.
Baseline and 12 months
The Remission Rate in Both the Quetiapine XR Group and the Risperidone Group at Month 12 in the ITT Population
Time Frame: 12 months
Remission was defined as a SWN-K total score greater than or equal to 80. The reported population is participants who showed remission over, time from baseline to Month 12
12 months
The Effect of Quetiapine XR Versus Risperidone at Month 12 in the ITT Population on Core Schizophrenic and Depressive Symptoms by Evaluating the Change From Baseline in CGI-SCH Overall Severity Score (Improved).
Time Frame: 12 months
For the CGI-SCH overall severity of illness, the score ranged from 1 (normal, not ill) to 7 (among the most severely ill). CGI-SCH score was divided into 3 classes: worsening (change score>0), stable (change score=0) and improved (change score<0). Change from baseline in CGI-SCH overall severity of illness in number of participants with CGI-SCH overall severity score improvement.
12 months
The Effect of Quetiapine XR Versus Risperidone at Month 12 in the ITT Population on Core Schizophrenic and Depressive Symptoms by Evaluating the Change From Baseline in CGI-SCH Overall Severity Score
Time Frame: 12 months
For the CGI-SCH (Clinical Global Impression-Schizophrenia severity of illness scale) overall severity of illness, the score ranged from 1 (normal, not ill) to 7 (among the most severely ill). Change from baseline in CGI-SCH score was divided into 3 classes: worsening (change score>0), stable (change score=0) and improved (change score<0).
12 months
The Effect of Quetiapine XR Versus Risperidone at Month 12 in the ITT Population on Core Schizophrenic and Depressive Symptoms by Evaluating the Change From Baseline in the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS) Total Score
Time Frame: 12 months
The CDSS total score is the sum of 9 questions and ranges from 0 to 27. The higher the score, the more severe are the symptoms.
12 months
The Effect of Quetiapine XR Versus Risperidone by Evaluating the Relapse Rate at Month 12 in the ITT Population
Time Frame: 12 months
Relapse is defined as at least one increase of greater than or equal to 2 points on the CGI-SCH overall severity score during the treatment period or at least one hospitalization due to psychiatric disorders during the treatment period.
12 months
Evaluation of Effect of Quetiapine XR Versus Risperidone on the Health-related Quality of Life of Patients With Schizophrenia by Evaluating the Change From Baseline in EQ-5D(Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension) Index Score at Month 12 in the ITT Population.
Time Frame: 12 months
The Euro Quality of Life - 5 dimension index (EQ-5D) is the result of the application of a formula that essentially attaches values (also called weights) to each of the levels (no, some, or heavy problems) in each dimension (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression). These weights are issued from a representative sample of the general population. The total possible maximum value was 1 (healthy life) and the minimum value was 0 (death).
12 months
To Evaluate the Effect of Quetiapine XR Versus Risperidone at Month 12 in the ITT Population Regarding Health Economics Outcomes by Evaluating the Functional Improvement Rate of the Modified Vocational Status Index/ Location Code Index: Stable State
Time Frame: 12 months
Stable State was defined as having the same status in occupational and residential status as at Baseline.
12 months
The Effect of Quetiapine XR Versus Risperidone Regarding Health Economics Outcomes by Evaluating the Mean Number of Lost School/Work Days at Month 12 in the ITT Population
Time Frame: 12 months
Workers and students are defined from the modified vocational status index excluding subjects "Retired" or "Unemployed, whether or not expected to work".
12 months
The Effect of Quetiapine XR Versus Risperidone Regarding Health Economics Outcomes by Evaluating the Participants With at Least 1 Hospitalization Due to Psychiatric Disorders at Month 12 in the ITT Population
Time Frame: 12 months
All hospitalizations due to psychiatric disorders during the study (i.e. from Visit 1 to Termination date + 30 days) in inpatients units, in emergency wards, and in day clinics.
12 months
Number of Subjects Who Had an Unscheduled Visits Due to Worsening of Schizophrenia, Dose Change, or Adverse Event at Month 12 in the ITT Population
Time Frame: Month 12
Unscheduled visits due to worsening of schizophrenia, dose change or adverse event including the hospitalizations due to psychiatric disorders during the study (i.e. from Visit 1 to Termination date + 30 days) in inpatients units, in emergency wards and in day clinics.
Month 12
The Effect of Quetiapine XR Versus Risperidone Regarding Health Economics Outcomes by Evaluating the Time Between First Study Drug Intake and First Hospitalization for Patients With 1 Hospitalization in the ITT Population
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
Number of Participants Using Antidepressants at Month 12 in the ITT Population
Time Frame: 12 months
The number of participants who were taking at least 1 antidepressant at Month 12. Antidepressants are all concomitant medications classified in the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical(ATC)Subgroup "N06-Antidepressants".
12 months
The Effect of Quetiapine XR Versus Risperidone Regarding Health Economics Outcomes by Evaluating the Number of Participants Using Other Psychotropic Medications at Month 12 in the ITT Population
Time Frame: 12 months
Other psychotropic medications include antiepileptics, anti-parkinson drugs, antipsychotics, and antidepressants.
12 months
The Compliance of Patients Taking Quetiapine XR Versus Risperidone at Month 12 by Evaluating the Number of Participants Who Returned Study Drug at Month 12 in the ITT Population
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
The Safety and Tolerability of Quetiapine XR Versus Risperidone by Evaluating the Number of Participants With a Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAEs) at Month 12 in the Safety Population
Time Frame: 12 months
Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events that occurred after the first intake of the study medication (or on the same day).
12 months
The Safety and Tolerability of Quetiapine XR Versus Risperidone by Evaluating the Number of Participants Who Discontinued the Study Because of an TEAE at Month 12 in the Safety Population
Time Frame: 12 months
Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events that occurred after the first intake of the study medication (or on the same day).
12 months
The Safety and Tolerability of Quetiapine XR Versus Risperidone by Evaluating the Number of Participants Who Had at Least 1 Extra-pyramidal TEAE at Month 12 in the Safety Population
Time Frame: 12 months
Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events that occurred after the first intake of the study medication (or on the same day).
12 months
The Safety and Tolerability of Quetiapine XR Versus Risperidone by Evaluating the Number of Extra-pyramidal Events at Month 12 in the Safety Population
Time Frame: 12 months
Extra-pyramidal events include tremor, hypokinesia, muscle rigidity, hyperkinesia, and extrapyramidal disorder.
12 months
The Safety and Tolerability of Quetiapine XR Versus Risperidone by Evaluating the Number of Participants Who Had at Least 1 Cardiac TEAE at Month 12 in the Safety Population
Time Frame: 12 months
Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events that occurred after the first intake of the study medication (or on the same day).
12 months
The Safety and Tolerability of Quetiapine XR Versus Risperidone by Evaluating the Mean Change From Baseline to Month 12 in Prolactin Levels in the Safety Population
Time Frame: 12 months
The normal range for men is 0 to 14, and for women is 0 to 24.
12 months
The Safety and Tolerability of Quetiapine XR vs Risperidone by Evaluating the Number of Participants at Month 12 in Safety Population With Individual Symptoms Assessed by the Modified Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser, Side Effect Rating Scale: Neurologic
Time Frame: 12 months
Symptoms are graded according to degree (not present to severe) and causal relationship (improbable, possible, probable). An individual AE is defined as an AE with a worse degree compared with Baseline and with a possible or probable relationship to study drug.
12 months
The Safety and Tolerability of Quetiapine XR Versus Risperidone by Evaluating the Number of Participants at Month 12 in the Safety Population With Individual Symptoms Assessed by the Modified UKU: Hyperprolactinaemia in Women
Time Frame: Month 12
Symptoms are graded according to degree (not present to severe) and causal relationship (improbable, possible, probable). Hyperprolactinaemia in women is defined as number of women who show the individual adverse event (AE) hyperprolactinaemia. An individual AE Hyperprolactinaemia is defined as an AE with a worse degree of hyperprolactinaemia compared with baseline and with a possible or probable relationship to study drug.
Month 12
The Safety and Tolerability of Quetiapine XR Versus Risperidone by Evaluating the Number of Participants at Month 12 in the Safety Population With Individual Symptoms Assessed by the Modified UKU: Sexual Dysfunction in Men
Time Frame: Month 12
Symptoms are graded according to degree (not present to severe) and causal relationship (improbable, possible, probable). Sexual dysfunction in men is defined as number of men who show the individual adverse event (AE) sexual dysfunction. An individual AE sexual dysfunction is defined as an AE with a worse degree of sexual dysfunction compared with baseline and with a possible or probable relationship to study drug.
Month 12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Martin Brecher, MSD, AstraZeneca
  • Principal Investigator: Prof Naber, MD, Klinikum Eppendorf

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 9, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 15, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

January 25, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

October 5, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 2, 2012

Last Verified

October 1, 2012

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe