- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT00625443
Phase 2, Parallel Group, Rollover Study of AKR-501 in Patients With ChronicITP Who Completed 28 Days of Study Treatment in Protocol 501-CL-003
A Phase 2, Parallel Group, Rollover Study of AKR-501 in Patients With Chronic Idiopathic Thrombocytopenic Purpura (ITP) Who Completed 28 Days of Study Treatment in Protocol 501-CL-003
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Participants eligible to enroll into this rollover protocol will begin study treatment within 2-5 days of their Day 28 study termination visit in Protocol 501-CL-003 (NCT00441090). Participants who met the primary efficacy response criterion in Protocol 501-CL-003 will continue receiving the same study treatment to which they were assigned in the previous protocol in a double-blinded manner, these being one of the following 5 treatments:
- avatrombopag 2.5 mg daily
- avatrombopag 5 mg daily
- avatrombopag 10 mg daily
- avatrombopag 20 mg daily
- placebo
Participants who did not meet the primary efficacy response criterion in Protocol 501-CL-003 who otherwise meet the eligibility criteria for this rollover protocol will be offered open label avatrombopag 10 mg daily.
This is a parallel group, rollover study.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Phase 2
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
California
-
Anaheim, California, United States, 92801
- Pacific Cancer Medical Center, Inc
-
Bakersfield, California, United States, 93309
- Comprehensive Blood and Cancer Center
-
-
Connecticut
-
Manchester, Connecticut, United States, 06105
- Davis, Posteraro and Wasser, MDs, LLP
-
-
Florida
-
New Port Richey, Florida, United States, 34655
- Florida Cancer Institute
-
-
Illinois
-
Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60612
- John H. Stroger, Jr. Hospital of Cook County, Div. of Hematology and Oncology
-
-
Indiana
-
New Albany, Indiana, United States, 47150
- Cancer Care Center, Inc.
-
-
Missouri
-
Jefferson City, Missouri, United States, 65109
- Capitol Comprehensive Cancer Care Clinic
-
Kansas City, Missouri, United States, 64131
- Kansas City Cancer Center, LLC
-
-
New York
-
New York, New York, United States, 10029
- Mount Sinai Medical Center
-
New York, New York, United States, 10032
- New York Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Medical College of Cornell University
-
-
North Carolina
-
High Point, North Carolina, United States, 27262
- Emerywood Oncology and Hematology
-
-
Ohio
-
Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43219
- Mid Ohio Oncology/Hematology, Inc., dba The Mark H. Zangmeister Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients who completed 28 days of study treatment in Protocol 501-CL-003.
- No significant safety or tolerability concerns from the patient's participation of Protocol 501-CL-003 as determined by the Investigator.
- Received medical monitor approval for enrollment into this study.
- Patients receiving maintenance corticosteroids may be enrolled, as long as the corticosteroids have been administered at a stable dose and the Investigator does not foresee the need to change the steroid dose during study participation. Patients should remain on this stable corticosteroid dose during study participation.
- Women of child-bearing potential must have a negative serum pregnancy test at the Day 28 assessment in Protocol 501-CL-003. (Childbearing potential is defined as any woman who has not been surgically sterilized and is pre-menopausal or peri-menopausal i.e., any menstrual flow within 12 months of Screening Visit A for Protocol 501-CL-003).
- Women of child-bearing potential must agree to practice a medically approved form of contraception (one of the following must be used: condoms (male or female) with a spermicidal agent, diaphragm or cervical cap with a spermicidal agent, IUD,hormonal contraception, abstinence).
- Willing and able to provide written informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Women who are pregnant and/or lactating.
Use of the following drugs or treatments:
- Rituximab
- Azathioprine, Cyclosporine A, or other immunosuppressant therapy
- Aspirin, Aspirin-containing compounds, Salicylates,Anticoagulants, Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs(NSAIDs)(including Cyclooxygenase-2 [COX-2] specific NSAIDs), clopidogrel; ticlopidine; and any drugs that affect platelet function.
- Danazol
- Rh0(D) immune globulin (WinRho®) or intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG).
- Inability to comply with protocol requirements or give informed consent, as determined by the Investigator.
For more information regarding inclusion/exclusion criteria, please see record for AKR 501-CL-003 Protocol.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Placebo (double-blind)
|
Placebo Orally, once daily administered under fasting conditions (at least 1 hr prior to or at least 2 hours after a meal or snack) Duration - 6 months |
Experimental: Avatrombopag tablets (open-label)
|
Dose 10 mg Orally, once daily administered under fasting conditions (at least 1 hr prior to or at least 2 hours after a meal or snack) Duration - 6 months
Other Names:
|
Experimental: Avatrombopag tablets (double-blind)
|
Dose: 2.5, 5, 10, or 20 mg Orally, once daily administered under fasting conditions (at least 1 hr prior to or at least 2 hours after a meal or snack) Duration - 6 months
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Time Frame: Day 1 through Month 6 while receiving treatment and at Month 7 after discontinuation of treatment.
|
A TEAE was defined as 1) the AE started on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to and including 30 days after the last dose of study drug, or 2) the AE started before the first dose of study drug but worsened in severity on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to and including 3 days after the last dose of study drug.
For participants having a tapering period of study drug, the last dose day is the last day of study drug during the tapering period.
Related AEs included those whose relationship was categorized as possible or probably by the investigator.
Dose interruption includes dose decreased, dose previously stopped, permanently stopped, or temporarily stopped.
The safety population was divided into three subgroups based on the mean daily dose of active study drug taken; lower 1/3 (less than 8.85 mg avatrombopag), middle 1/3 (greater than or equal to 8.85 mg but less than 13.5 mg avatrombopag), and upper 1/3 (greater than or equal to 13.5 mg avatrombopag).
|
Day 1 through Month 6 while receiving treatment and at Month 7 after discontinuation of treatment.
|
Incidence of Severe (Grade 3 or 4) TEAEs
Time Frame: Day 1 through Month 6 while receiving treatment and at Month 7 after discontinuation of treatment.
|
A TEAE was defined as 1) the AE started on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to and including 30 days after the last dose of drug, or 2) the AE started before the first dose of study drug but worsened in severity on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to and including 3 days after the last dose of study drug.
For participants having a tapering period of study drug, the last dose day is the last day of study drug during the tapering period.
The safety population was divided into three subgroups based on the mean daily dose of active study drug taken; lower 1/3 (less than 8.85 mg avatrombopag), middle 1/3 (greater than or equal to 8.85 mg but less than 13.5 mg avatrombopag), and upper 1/3 (greater than or equal to 13.5 mg avatrombopag).
|
Day 1 through Month 6 while receiving treatment and at Month 7 after discontinuation of treatment.
|
Incidence of Drug-Related TEAEs
Time Frame: Day 1 through Month 6 while receiving treatment and at Month 7 after discontinuation of treatment.
|
Drug-related TEAEs included those whose relationship was categorized as possible or probably by the investigator.
A TEAE was defined as 1) the AE started on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to and including 30 days after the last dose of drug, or 2) the AE started before the first dose of study drug but worsened in severity on or after the date of first dose of study drug up to and including 3 days after the last dose of study drug.
For participants having a tapering period of study drug, the last dose day is the last day of study drug during the tapering period.
The safety population was divided into three subgroups based on the mean daily dose of active study drug taken; lower 1/3 (less than 8.85 mg avatrombopag), middle 1/3 (greater than or equal to 8.85 mg but less than 13.5 mg avatrombopag), and upper 1/3 (greater than or equal to 13.5 mg avatrombopag).
|
Day 1 through Month 6 while receiving treatment and at Month 7 after discontinuation of treatment.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Median Platelet Counts at Selected Analysis Timepoints
Time Frame: Day 1, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, and Follow-up Weeks (after last dose of study drug in this study) 1, 2, 3, 4
|
Platelet count (PC) was measured from blood draws.
Based on avatrombopag response in study 501-CL-003, participants were divided into two subgroups; 1) "Responders", participants who met the primary efficacy response; pretreatment PC was less than 30,000/mm^3 and increased to greater than or equal to 50,000/mm^3 after treatment with avatrombopag, and for participants on steroids, pretreatment PC was greater than or equal to 30,000/mm3 but less than 50,000/mm^3 and increased to a PC greater than or equal to 20,000/mm^3 above their pretreatment values and 2) "Nonresponders", participants who did not meet the primary efficacy response and those who were in the placebo arm.
Open-label dose escalation of avatrombopag, as well as reductions in ITP-directed concomitant therapy (e.g.
steroids) was allowed for all participants.
During the periods of avatrombopag dose escalation and/or ITP-directed concomitant medication reduction, platelet sampling was done weekly.
|
Day 1, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, and Follow-up Weeks (after last dose of study drug in this study) 1, 2, 3, 4
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Platelet Count of 100,000/mm^3 or Higher by Response Status and Selected Study Visit
Time Frame: Baseline (last PC before first dose of study drug in previous study), Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, and Follow-up Weeks (after last dose of study drug in this study) 1, 2, 3, 4
|
Platelet count (PC) was measured from blood draws.
Based on avatrombopag response in study 501-CL-003, participants were divided into two subgroups; 1) "Responders", participants who met the primary efficacy response; pretreatment PC was less than 30,000/mm^3 and increased to greater than or equal to 50,000/mm^3 after treatment with avatrombopag, and for participants on steroids, pretreatment PC was greater than or equal to 30,000/mm^3 but less than 50,000/mm^3 and increased to a PC greater than or equal to 20,000/mm^3 above their pretreatment values and 2) "Nonresponders", participants who did not meet the primary efficacy response and those who were in the placebo arm.
Open-label dose escalation of avatrombopag, as well as reductions in ITP-directed concomitant therapy (e.g.
steroids) was allowed for all participants.
During the periods of avatrombopag dose escalation and/or ITP-directed concomitant medication reduction, platelet sampling was done weekly.
|
Baseline (last PC before first dose of study drug in previous study), Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, and Follow-up Weeks (after last dose of study drug in this study) 1, 2, 3, 4
|
Percentage of Participants Who Maintained a Platelet Count of 100,000/mm^3 or Higher by Response Status
Time Frame: Baseline (last PC before first dose of study drug in previous study), Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, and Follow-up Weeks (after last dose of study drug in this study) 1, 2, 3, 4
|
Platelet count (PC) was measured from blood draws.
Based on avatrombopag response in study 501-CL-003, participants were divided into two subgroups; 1) "Responders", participants who met the primary efficacy response; pretreatment PC was less than 30,000/mm^3 and increased to greater than or equal to 50,000/mm^3 after treatment with avatrombopag, and for participants on steroids, pretreatment PC was greater than or equal to 30,000/mm^3 but less than 50,000/mm^3 and increased to a PC greater than or equal to 20,000/mm^3 above their pretreatment values and 2) "Nonresponders", participants who did not meet the primary efficacy response and those who were in the placebo arm.
Open-label dose escalation of avatrombopag, as well as reductions in ITP-directed concomitant therapy (e.g.
steroids) was allowed for all participants.
During the periods of avatrombopag dose escalation and/or ITP-directed concomitant medication reduction, platelet sampling was done weekly.
|
Baseline (last PC before first dose of study drug in previous study), Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, and Follow-up Weeks (after last dose of study drug in this study) 1, 2, 3, 4
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Response-Level Platelet Count by Selected Study Visit
Time Frame: Baseline (last PC before first dose of study drug in previous study), Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, and Follow-up Weeks (after last dose of study drug in this study) 1, 2, 3, 4
|
Platelet count (PC) was measured from blood draws.
Based on avatrombopag response in study 501-CL-003, participants were divided into two subgroups; 1) "Responders", participants who met the primary efficacy response; pretreatment PC was less than 30,000/mm^3 and increased to greater than or equal to 50,000/mm^3 after treatment with avatrombopag, and for participants on steroids, pretreatment PC was greater than or equal to 30,000/mm^3 but less than 50,000/mm^3 and increased to a PC greater than or equal to 20,000/mm^3 above their pretreatment values and 2) "Nonresponders", participants who did not meet the primary efficacy response and those who were in the placebo arm.
Open-label dose escalation of avatrombopag, as well as reductions in ITP-directed concomitant therapy (e.g.
steroids) was allowed for all participants.
During the periods of avatrombopag dose escalation and/or ITP-directed concomitant medication reduction, platelet sampling was done weekly.
|
Baseline (last PC before first dose of study drug in previous study), Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, and Follow-up Weeks (after last dose of study drug in this study) 1, 2, 3, 4
|
Percentage of Participants Who Maintained Response-Level Platelet Count
Time Frame: Baseline (last PC before first dose of study drug in previous study), Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, and Follow-up Weeks (after last dose of study drug in this study) 1, 2, 3, 4
|
Platelet count (PC) was measured from blood draws.
Based on avatrombopag response in study 501-CL-003, participants were divided into two subgroups; 1) "Responders", participants who met the primary efficacy response; pretreatment PC was less than 30,000/mm^3 and increased to greater than or equal to 50,000/mm^3 after treatment with avatrombopag, and for participants on steroids, pretreatment PC was greater than or equal to 30,000/mm^3 but less than 50,000/mm^3 and increased to a PC greater than or equal to 20,000/mm^3 above their pretreatment values and 2) "Nonresponders", participants who did not meet the primary efficacy response and those who were in the placebo arm.
Open-label dose escalation of avatrombopag, as well as reductions in ITP-directed concomitant therapy (e.g.
steroids) was allowed for all participants.
During the periods of avatrombopag dose escalation and/or ITP-directed concomitant medication reduction, platelet sampling was done weekly.
|
Baseline (last PC before first dose of study drug in previous study), Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, and Follow-up Weeks (after last dose of study drug in this study) 1, 2, 3, 4
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Durable, Transient, or Overall Platelet Response
Time Frame: Baseline (last PC before first dose of study drug in previous study), Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, and Follow-up Weeks (after last dose of study drug in this study) 1, 2, 3, 4
|
Platelet count (PC) was measured from blood draws.
Based on avatrombopag response in study 501-CL-003, participants were divided into two subgroups; 1) "Responders", participants who met the primary efficacy response; pretreatment PC was less than 30,000/mm^3 and increased to greater than or equal to 50,000/mm^3 after treatment with avatrombopag, and for participants on steroids, pretreatment PC was greater than or equal to 30,000/mm^3 but less than 50,000/mm^3 and increased to a PC greater than or equal to 20,000/mm^3 above their pretreatment values and 2) "Nonresponders", participants who did not meet the primary efficacy response and those who were in the placebo arm.
Open-label dose escalation of avatrombopag, as well as reductions in ITP-directed concomitant therapy (e.g.
steroids) was allowed for all participants.
During the periods of avatrombopag dose escalation and/or ITP-directed concomitant medication reduction, platelet sampling was done weekly.
|
Baseline (last PC before first dose of study drug in previous study), Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, and Follow-up Weeks (after last dose of study drug in this study) 1, 2, 3, 4
|
Number of Participants With Changes in Concomitant Steroid Use
Time Frame: Day 1 through last 8 weeks of the Treatment Period
|
A participant who used steroids at study entry was considered to have permanently discontinued steroid use if they had no steroid use during the last 8 weeks of the study Treatment Period.
A participant who used steroids at study entry was considered to have decreased concomitant steroid medication by at least 50% if they permanently discontinued steroids, or in no dose of steroid was higher than 50% of their baseline steroid dose during the last 8 weeks of the study Treatment Period.
|
Day 1 through last 8 weeks of the Treatment Period
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Pathologic Processes
- Immune System Diseases
- Autoimmune Diseases
- Hematologic Diseases
- Hemorrhage
- Hemorrhagic Disorders
- Blood Coagulation Disorders
- Skin Manifestations
- Thrombocytopenia
- Blood Platelet Disorders
- Thrombotic Microangiopathies
- Purpura
- Purpura, Thrombocytopenic
- Purpura, Thrombocytopenic, Idiopathic
Other Study ID Numbers
- AKR-501-CL-004
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Idiopathic Thrombocytopenic Purpura
-
Protalex, Inc.TerminatedPhase I Safety and Tolerability Study of Staphylococcal Protein A in Adult Patients With Chronic ITPIdiopathic Thrombocytopenic Purpura (ITP)Australia, New Zealand
-
CSL LimitedCompletedIdiopathic Thrombocytopenic Purpura (ITP)Australia
-
University Hospital, BordeauxCompletedChronic Idiopathic Thrombocytopenic Purpura | Congenital Thrombocytopenia
-
University Hospital, AngersMinistry of Health, FranceUnknownAcute Idiopathic Thrombocytopenic PurpuraFrance
-
AmgenCompletedThrombocytopenia | Immune Thrombocytopenia | Idiopathic Thrombocytopenic Purpura | Thrombocytopenia in Pediatric Subjects With Immune (Idiopathic) Thrombocytopenic Purpura (ITP) | Thrombocytopenia in Subjects With Immune (Idiopathic) Thrombocytopenic Purpura (ITP) | Thrombocytopenic PurpuraUnited States, Canada, Australia
-
Neufeld, Ellis J, MD, PhDGenentech, Inc.; Biogen; Glaser Pediatric Research Network; Terrana ITP Research...CompletedImmune Thrombocytopenic Purpura (ITP) | Idiopathic Thrombocytopenic Purpura (ITP)United States
-
Weill Medical College of Cornell UniversityGenentech, Inc.WithdrawnIdiopathic Thrombocytopenic Purpura (ITP)United States
-
Jiangsu HengRui Medicine Co., Ltd.UnknownChronic Idiopathic Thrombocytopenic PurpuraChina
-
GlaxoSmithKlineCompletedChronic Idiopathic Thrombocytopenic Purpura | Purpura, Thrombocytopenic, IdiopathicJapan
-
AmgenCompletedIdiopathic Thrombocytopenic Purpura | Thrombocytopenia in Pediatric Subjects With Immune (Idiopathic) Thrombocytopenic Purpura (ITP) | Thrombocytopenia in Subjects With Immune (Idiopathic) Thrombocytopenic Purpura (ITP)
Clinical Trials on Blinded (placebo)
-
Lexicon PharmaceuticalsRecruitingDiabetic Peripheral Neuropathic PainUnited States
-
AstraZenecaRecruitingSystemic Sclerosis | SclerodermaUnited Kingdom, United States, Italy, Mexico, Belgium, Germany, Spain, China, France, India, Austria, Canada, Poland, Israel, Korea, Republic of, Hungary, Japan, South Africa, Turkey, Netherlands, Romania
-
Woman'sDexCom, Inc.RecruitingPostpartum Gestational Diabetes MellitusUnited States
-
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical CenterMayo Clinic; National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS); NYU Langone Health and other collaboratorsCompletedAutoimmune Autonomic Ganglionopathy (AAG)United States
-
Children's Hospital Medical Center, CincinnatiNational Institutes of Health (NIH); Regeneron PharmaceuticalsActive, not recruitingEosinophilic Gastritis | Eosinophilic GastroenteritisUnited States
-
Yu QinActive, not recruiting
-
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLCCompleted
-
KK Women's and Children's HospitalRecruitingPregnancy | Gestational DiabetesSingapore
-
The London Spine CentreUnknownLumbar Degenerative Spinal StenosisCanada
-
Woman'sDexCom, Inc.Active, not recruitingGestational Diabetes Mellitus in PregnancyUnited States