Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) Awareness Project: Peer-to-Peer Dissemination

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the introduction of an EBP text for Nursing Research Council (NRC) members to use with RN staff to increase staff belief in, knowledge of and implementation of EBP in providing patient care. The theory that will drive this study is Disciplined Clinical Inquiry (DCI).

The current study will use a quasi-experimental design plus DCI to engage unit RN staff in deciding how they might learn about EBP in a feasible, useful way. After collection of baseline data, the NRC member will introduce the text + solicit staff input into a plan for using the text to increase understanding of EBP and use of evidence to make practice changes on her/his own unit. Another unit in that service line or under the same Service Line Administrator will serve as a comparison unit. Data collection will be conducted again after 4 and 12 weeks. At the 12 week point, the NRC member will introduce the text + solicit staff input for a plan on the comparison unit. Data collection will be conducted on the comparison unit at 16 weeks, and again on both units at 24 weeks. At the 24 week point, additional units will be added and the process repeated until all units represented on the NRC have been included.

Outcome measures will include: EBP belief and EBP implementation scales (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2003); EBP knowledge cognitive test; # of lit searches conducted by unit RN staff ; # of requests for library support for lit searches or to obtain search-related articles: # of unit clinical policies with documented levels of evidence & research references. EBP belief, EBP implementation and EBP knowledge variables will be analyzed at both individual and unit levels of analysis. All other variables will be measured at the unit level of analysis. Additional unit level variables will include the following data collected annually as part of the National Database for Nursing Quality Indicator (NDNQI) RN satisfaction survey: satisfaction with RN-RN interaction, satisfaction with autonomy, satisfaction with practice decision-making, perceived quality of care delivered on the unit.

The primary statistical procedures for analysis will be ANCOVA, ANOVAwith repeated measures, and logistic regression.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

91

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

All RN staff & RN patient service leaders (PSLs) who are over 18 years of age, employed by Upstate and working full or parttime on direct care units within service lines represented on the Nursing Research Council (NRC) will be invited to participate. This target population includes approximately 551 staff RNs & PSLs. We expect to enroll a minimum of 5 and as many as 15 RNs on the 29 nursing units over the course of the study for a sample size between 145 and 435

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • over 18 yrs of age
  • employed by Upstate
  • full or parttime on unit represented on Nursing Research Council

Exclusion Criteria:

  • employed by an agency other than Upstate
  • working on a unit not represented on the Nursing Research Council

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
1
staff Registered Nurses receiving EBP peer mentoring
2
staff Registered Nurses not receiving EBP peer mentoring

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
EBP Beliefs
Time Frame: baseline, 4 wks, 8 wks, 12 wks, 24 wks
baseline, 4 wks, 8 wks, 12 wks, 24 wks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
EBP Implementation
Time Frame: baseline, 4 wks, 8 wks, 12 wks, 24 wks,
baseline, 4 wks, 8 wks, 12 wks, 24 wks,

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Priscilla S Worral, PhD, RN, State University of New York - Upstate Medical University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2005

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2006

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2006

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 7, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 13, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

March 14, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

June 9, 2009

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 8, 2009

Last Verified

June 1, 2009

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Evidence-Based Medicine

3
Subscribe