Effect of the Interferon Alpha Citizen by Sub-Lingual Way on the Humoral Immunizing Answer (GP-INFA)

March 28, 2008 updated by: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Randomized Double-Blind Placebo Controlled Study Evaluating the Effect of Sublingual Administration of IFNa on the Immune Response to Influenza Vaccination in Subjects Aged 75 or More.

Influenza vaccination reduces the morbidity and mortality associated with influenza infection in at risk groups including the elderly and individuals with an impaired immune response, but is not totally protective in all recipient. Cytokines including type I interferons are known to play a key role in the innate immune response to virus infection and in the induction of the primary adaptive-immune response. Thus, we evaluated the safety of sublingual administration of IFNa and its effect on immune response to influenza vaccination in a randomized double-blind placebo controlled study in elderly institutionalized individuals.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The protection afforded by the commonly used influenza sub-unit vaccines is thought to be due principally to the production of antibodies to viral haemagglutinin. The haemagglutination inhibitory (HAI) antibody titer is generally used as a surrogate marker of protection and a HAI antibody titer of 1:40 or greater is considered to confer protection. This is attained, however, in only 50% of elderly subject. Thus, there is an unmet need for an effective non-toxic adjuvant capable of enhancing the antibody response to influenza and other vaccines. Type I IFNs have been shown to induce B-lymphocytes to differentiate into antibody producing plasma cells and to be necessary for the production of both specific and polyclonal IgGs in response to influenza infection. Furthermore, type I IFNs increase the primary antibody response to a soluble antigen in vivo, and increase the production of all IgG sub-classes. Type I IFNs play a key role in adjuvant-induced Th1 responses. Thus, we evaluated the safety of sublingual administration of IFNa and its effect on immune response to influenza vaccination.Institutionalized subjects, aged 75 or more, were randomly assigned to two groups to receive in a double-blind fashion either 107 IU of Intron ATM in 1 ml of isotonic saline or 1 ml of saline alone (placebo) administered sublingually. Interferon or placebo were retained in the mouth for at least 30 seconds prior to ejection. All subjects were then vaccinated, within 30 minutes, with a single intramuscular injection (im) of influenza vaccine (InfluvacTM, Solvay Pharma, France).

The primary objective of this study is to compare the immunogenicity percentage of subjects who increased up to 4 fold their HAI antibody titer at day 21) obtained in the IFN treated group relative to the placebo treated group.

The secondary objectives are to compare mean HAI antibodies titers obtained in the two groups at day 21 ; specific IgG, IgG2a, IgG2a/IgG1 ratio and secretory IgA titers in the 2 groups; specific secretory IgA titers in saliva; durability of protective HAI antibodies titers 3 and 6 months after the vaccination and the safety of sublingual administration of IFNa.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

140

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Paris, France, 75005
        • Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Groupe Hospitalier Broca-La Rochefoucauld, Service de Gérontologie 1

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

75 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects aged 75 or more, -institutionalized-
  • Subjects who were informed of the objectives of the study and who have given their written consent.
  • Subjects who have received at least one prior influenza vaccination in the previous 5 years.
  • Subjects who should be vaccinated against influenza during the 2005 vaccination campaign.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals with severe disease, including neoplasia, autoimmune disease, or type I diabetes
  • concomitant treatment with glucocorticoid or immunosuppressive drugs splenectomy or tonsillectomy
  • or incapacity to open the mouth

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: 2
Placebo
Placebo
Active Comparator: 1
IFNalpha 2b
IFNalpha 2b
Other Names:
  • Influenza vaccination

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Percentage of subjects presenting an increase > 4 fold of antiH1N1 or antiH3N2 or anti-B haemagglutination inhibition antibody titer, 3 weeks following influenza vaccination.
Time Frame: 21 days
21 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
geometric mean of haemagglutination antibody titer obtained at day 21 with or without IFNa
Time Frame: 21 days
21 days
influenza virus strain-specific IgG total, IgG2a, IgG2a/IgG1 ratio, secretory IgA responses at day 21 in each group .
Time Frame: 21 days
21 days
influenza virus strain-specific secretory IgA anti-influenza antibody titers in saliva 14 and 21 days following vaccination.
Time Frame: 21 days
21 days
evaluation of individual response to IFNa treatment
Time Frame: 21 days
21 days
levels of serologic alpha interferon and of anti- alpha -interferon at day 21.
Time Frame: 21 days
21 days
Percentage of patients maintaining protective antibody titers 3 and 6 months following vaccination.
Time Frame: 3 months and 6 months after
3 months and 6 months after
Predictive factors of vaccine response (age, total lymphocyte cell count, CD4 cell count…)
Time Frame: 21 days
21 days
Evaluation of cellular vaccine response in a subgroup of subjects.
Time Frame: 21 days
21 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Frederic Bloch, MD, PhD, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Groupe Hospitalier Broca-La Rochefoucauld, Service de Gérontologie 1 AP-HP

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2005

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2006

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 26, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 28, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

March 31, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 31, 2008

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 28, 2008

Last Verified

November 1, 2005

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Influenza Infection

Clinical Trials on Placebo

Subscribe