Utility of Induced Sputum Using Hypertonic Saline to Evaluate Infection and Inflammation in Cystic Fibrosis

August 30, 2013 updated by: Felix Ratjen, The Hospital for Sick Children

Diagnostic Utility of Induced Sputum Using Hypertonic Saline to Evaluate Airway Infection and Inflammation in Cystic Fibrosis

The objective of the study is to evaluate the clinical utility and the feasibility, in an outpatient setting, of sputum induction using hypertonic saline. This study will also study pilot techniques on a sub using a sub-sample to assess the lower airway inflammatory cells and markers in relation to new emerging organisms in cystic fibrosis (CF) and antibiotic therapy in CF.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Chronic airway infection, mainly by Staphylococcus aureus (SA) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA), is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). Isolation of organisms from the respiratory tract is important to optimize treatment. The current recommended methods for bacterial evaluation are bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and expectorated sputum (ES) analysis. However, a significant proportion of young CF patients cannot produce sputum spontaneously. The method used most frequently therefore is to isolate respiratory organisms is to perform throat swabs (TS) which have poor sensitivity and specificity in the evaluation of respiratory pathogens in CF patients.

Induced sputum (IS) using hypertonic saline has been used in a limited number of studies to evaluate respiratory organisms in CF patients. These studies have reported that IS may be a useful non-invasive diagnostic test to increase the yield of detection of respiratory pathogens.

Beside its use as a diagnostic test to identify bacterial pathogens induced sputum has been used to assess lower airway inflammation in CF. While numerous studies have clarified the role of S. aureus and P. aeruginosa in CF lung disease, the role of other emerging bacteria such as Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (SM) and Achromobacter xylosoxidans (AX) species remains largely unclear. IS offers the potential to possibly differentiate between colonisation and infection for the emerging pathogens and to help clarify their role in CF lung disease.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

95

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G 1X8
        • The Hospital for Sick Children

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

6 years to 18 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Children diagnosed with CF (by sweat chloride ≥60 and/or genetic testing)
  2. Children ages between 6-18 years
  3. Ability to perform pulmonary function tests
  4. FEV1 ≥ 30% predicted18.

Additional inclusion criteria for sub-sample undergoing antibiotic therapy:

  1. Above criteria
  2. Admitted to hospital for i.v. antibiotic therapy

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Acute respiratory distress or hypoxia (oxygen saturation <92% at room air)
  2. New onset of wheezing
  3. Previous history of intolerance of inhalation of HS

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 1
After each subject has performed post-bronchodilator spirometry, he/she will inhale increasing concentrations of 3, 4, and 5% of hypertonic saline for 7 minutes each for 3 cycles until expectorating a sufficient sputum sample.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Additional positive bacterial culture yield post IS technique for known and emerging CF pathogens over conventional methods of bacterial culturing (ES and TS).
Time Frame: 60 minutes; for subgroup, this will be repeated a second time after 14 days.
60 minutes; for subgroup, this will be repeated a second time after 14 days.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Inflammatory profile as measured by relative neutrophil count and IL-8 concentration in the IS
Time Frame: 60 minutes; for subgroup, this will be repeated a second time after 14 days.
60 minutes; for subgroup, this will be repeated a second time after 14 days.
Bacterial colony counts
Time Frame: 60 minutes; for subgroup, this will be repeated a second time after 14 days.
60 minutes; for subgroup, this will be repeated a second time after 14 days.
Frequency of change in clinical management based on results from IS
Time Frame: 60 minutes; for subgroup, this will be repeated a second time after 14 days.
60 minutes; for subgroup, this will be repeated a second time after 14 days.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Felix Ratjen, MD, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto Canada

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 21, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 21, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

July 23, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

September 2, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 30, 2013

Last Verified

August 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cystic Fibrosis

Clinical Trials on Hypertonic Saline

Subscribe