The Impact of the Type and Route of Nutritional Support on Infectious Complications After Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery

August 8, 2008 updated by: Jagiellonian University

The Impact of the Type and Route of Nutritional Support on Infectious Complications After Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery - A Prospective, Randomized, Clinical Trial.

The study was designed to test the hypothesis that immunonutrition and enteral nutrition would reduce the incidence of infectious complications in a population of malnourished patients following elective upper GI surgery

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

All patients qualified between June 2002 and December 2007 to total and distal subtotal gastrectomy or pancreaticoduodenectomy were screened for eligibility to participate in the study. Malnutrition was defined by the Nutritional Risk Index (NRI), calculated according to the formula used in the Veterans Administration Cooperative Group trial.{, 1991 #70} Additional eligibility criteria included: age between 18 and 80 years, Karnofsky performance status score of 80 or more, and adequate organ function measured by routine blood tests. Patients without features of malnutrition, as well as those with disseminated tumors, serious comorbidities (American Society of Anesthesiologists risk class of 4 or 5), and renal or liver failure were excluded. The study was designed to test the hypothesis that immunonutrition and enteral nutrition would reduce the incidence of infectious complications in a population of malnourished patients following elective upper GI surgery. Therefore, patients were randomly assigned in a 2×2 factorial design to four groups receiving immunostimulating versus normal diets, and enteral versus intravenous nutritional support. The secondary objective of the study was to evaluate the effect of nutritional intervention on overall morbidity and mortality rates, and the length of hospital stay.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

600

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • _30978
      • Krakow, _30978, Poland, 307981
        • 1st Department of SUegy

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age between 18 and 80 years,
  • Karnofsky performance status score of 80 or more,
  • adequate organ function measured by routine blood tests

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients <18 or > 80
  • Karnofsky performance < 50

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: 1
Standard Enteral Nutrition - Peptisorb, Nutricia Ltd.
Reconvan (1ml=1 kcal), 30 kcal/kg b.w. Omegaven 1 ml/ kg b.w. Dipeptiven 1 ml/ kg b.w.
No Intervention: 2
Standard Parenteral Nutrition: Aminomel, Lipofundin, Glucose, Cernevit, Tracutil, electrolytes
Reconvan (1ml=1 kcal), 30 kcal/kg b.w. Omegaven 1 ml/ kg b.w. Dipeptiven 1 ml/ kg b.w.
Experimental: 3
Immunomodulating Enteral Nutrition: Reconvan, Fresenius Kabi Poland
Reconvan (1ml=1 kcal), 30 kcal/kg b.w. Omegaven 1 ml/ kg b.w. Dipeptiven 1 ml/ kg b.w.
Experimental: 4
Immunomodulating Parenteral Nutrition: Aminomel, Lipofundin, Glucose, Cernevit, Tracutil, electrolytes + Omegaven (Fresenius Kabi), Dipepitven (Fresenius Kabi)
Reconvan (1ml=1 kcal), 30 kcal/kg b.w. Omegaven 1 ml/ kg b.w. Dipeptiven 1 ml/ kg b.w.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Immunonutrition and enteral nutrition would reduce the incidence of infectious complications in a population of malnourished patients
Time Frame: Immunonutrition
Immunonutrition

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
To evaluate the effect of nutritional intervention on overall morbidity and mortality rates, and the length of hospital stay
Time Frame: morbidity
morbidity

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Stanislaw Klek, MD, PhD, Jagiellonian University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2002

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2002

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2007

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 5, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 8, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

August 12, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

August 12, 2008

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 8, 2008

Last Verified

July 1, 2008

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • surg nutr

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Gastrointestinal Surgery

Clinical Trials on Reconvan, Dipeptiven, Omegaven

Subscribe