Surgical Treatment of Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma: Minor or Major Liver Resection?

December 10, 2009 updated by: Huazhong University of Science and Technology
The investigators conducted a prospective study to determine the safety and efficacy of minor and major hepatectomy selected by predetermined criteria in 138 patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma. In selected patients, minor liver resection was a good treatment.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Objective: To determine the safety and efficacy of minor and major hepatectomy selected by predetermined criteria in patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HC).

Summary Background Data: For HC treated with hepatectomy, the extent of liver resection remains controversial despite extensive studies.

Methods: From January 2000 to December 2007, we prospectively studied patients who received surgical treatment for HC. Of the 187 patients who were surgically treated, 138 (73.8%) underwent resection with a curative intent. Minor hepatectomy was carried out in 93 patients who had Bismuth-Corlette types I, II and III HC without hepatic artery/portal vein invasion; and major hepatectomy in 45 patients who had type III HC with hepatic artery/portal vein invasion, or type IV HC.

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

26 years to 72 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Criteria for resectability were absence of peritoneal or liver metastases, tumor extension to beyond secondary biliary branches bilaterally, tumor extension to secondary portal venous branches bilaterally

Exclusion Criteria:

  • not in accordance with the above criteria

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control group

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
On multivariate analysis, prognostic factors significantly impacted on long-term survival were UICC tumor stage and histopathologic grade.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 8, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 11, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

August 12, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 11, 2009

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 10, 2009

Last Verified

August 1, 2008

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hepatectomy

Clinical Trials on Minor or Major Liver Resection

Subscribe