Evaluating the Effects of EHRs, P4P and Medical Home Redesign in the Hudson Valley

February 17, 2017 updated by: Weill Medical College of Cornell University
The investigators will conduct a longitudinal cohort study with concurrent controls. The investigators will include all primary care physicians in the Hudson Valley including family practitioners, internists, and pediatricians. The purpose of this study is to determine the effects of implementing electronic health records (EHRs), pay-for-performance incentives for physicians (P4P), and Medical Home redesign on health care quality, cost and patient experience in the Hudson Valley.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The Hudson Valley is implementing several innovative programs to potentially improve quality and reduce the cost of health care delivered. First the Taconic Health Information Network and Communities Regional Health Information Organization (THINC RHIO) is facilitating diffusion of EHRs in office practices in the Hudson Valley. Second, THINC RHIO is also offering a strategic approach to pay-for-performance. Third, an additional component of the THINC P4P project will be an added financial incentive for private practice physicians who implement and reach Level II of Physician Practice Connections® - Patient Centered Medical Home (PCMH)™, NCQA's new national recognition system for physician practices. Our study will seek to determine the effect of each of these initiatives on health care quality and cost of care in the Hudson Valley. We will also measure the patient experience before and after implementation of the Medical Home.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

438

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10021
        • Weill Cornell Medical College

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All primary care physicians (i.e. general internists, pediatricians and family practice physicians) in the Hudson Valley who are members of the Taconic Independent Practice Association (IPA).

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Primary care physicians working in the offices practices in the Hudson Valley, and who are members of the Taconic IPA.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Physicians who opt out from the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
1
Physicians that are using paper-based medical charts and who are not receiving Medical Home redesign incentives.
2
Physicians that are using Electronic Health Records (EHRs) and who are not undergoing Medical Home redesign.
Computer-based system that allows physicians to access and manage patient records electronically.
3
Physicians that are using Electronic Health Records (EHRs) and undergoing Medical Home redesign.
Computer-based system that allows physicians to access and manage patient records electronically.
Implementation of NCQA Level III Medical Home

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
health care quality (as determined by previously selected and approved quality indicators)
Time Frame: 5 years
5 years
health care utilization
Time Frame: 5 years
5 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 14, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 18, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

November 19, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 23, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 17, 2017

Last Verified

February 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Electronic Health Records

Clinical Trials on Electronic health record (EHR)

3
Subscribe