Antidepressant Effect of Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease Patients

June 2, 2010 updated by: Hadassah Medical Organization

Antidepressant Effect of Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) in Parkinson's Disease (PD) Patients: Relationship of Stimulation Parameters to Improvement in the Clinical Features of Depression in PD Patients.

The purpose of this study is:

  1. To determine, in the context of a prospective clinical trial, whether stimulation parameters in PD patients treated with DBS, are associated with antidepressant effects.
  2. To determine whether these antidepressant effects are related to or independent of changes in the motor features of PD.
  3. To establish a computerized database that includes stimulation parameters and clinical parameters in PD patients treated with DBS.
  4. To develop a computer-assisted decision making protocol for programming of DBS parameters in both depressed and non-depressed PD patients.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Depressive symptoms of PD patients are major predictors of their prognosis and quality of life. Therefore, successful treatment of depression is crucial in PD patients. Using deep brain stimulation as an antidepressant (or to augment a standard antidepressant) could be a promising new direction. The hypothesis to be tested in the current project is that treatment with deep brain stimulation will improve both the neurological and the psychiatric (depressive) symptoms of PD. It is further hypothesized that the improvement in depressive symptoms will not be a simple consequence of improvement in neurological status. Data from this open label study will form the basis for planning a larger scale controlled trial in depressed PD patients and exploratory studies in patients with major depression who do not have PD.

Today, programming of DBS is based on the neurological evaluation of the motor features of PD. If our hypothesis is proven, i.e. parameter manipulation of DBS affects the mental features of PD, it is crucial to establish a valid database that will enable to study these effects. Moreover, such a detailed database will be the basis for the development of a computer-assisted decision making protocol for programming of DBS. A novel decision making protocol will maximize the benefits of DBS in both depressed and non-depressed PD patients.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Jerusalem, Israel, 91120
        • Hadassah Medical Organization

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 75 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Clinically definite PD treated / candidates for treatment with DBS (patients with advanced idiopathic PD who are deemed appropriate for DBS surgery).
  2. Patients will be included in the study irrespective of whether a diagnosis of major depression (mild to moderate but not severe MDD) is fulfilled at baseline. Patients without depression will be monitored in the study for evidence of treatment emergent depression. Patients with depression will be monitored for antidepressant effects of stimulation change.
  3. Age 40-75 years
  4. Male or female.
  5. Competent and willing to give written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Significant suicidal risk [Hamilton Depression scale item 3 (suicide) >2].
  2. Comorbidity with any Psychotic Disorder, Bipolar Disorder, Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), Eating Disorder.
  3. Lifetime history of substance or alcohol dependence or of abuse in the preceding 12 months
  4. Significant cognitive decline, as measured by Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination (ACE) and the Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: 1
PD patient that were treated with STN DBS and developed depression after the surgery (n=5).
DBS parameters will be set to increase the DBS affected volume to include both the cognitive and limbic territories in addition to the dorso-lateral motor territories of the STN. This novel approach to parameter selection is directed to achieve improvement in cognitive and limbic as well as motor domains of PD. The patients will therefore be assessed for cognitive, limbic and motor state at multiple time points; there will be a baseline assessment prior to starting treatment (prior to DBS surgery and/or prior to parameters changes); thereafter assessments will follow the stimulation parameter changes; thereafter follow-up assessments at 6 - 12 months. Stimulation parameters will be changed every 2 weeks or earlier if an urgent clinical state emerges. Patients with depression will be monitored for antidepressant effects of stimulation changes. Patients without depression will be monitored for evidence of treatment emergent depression.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: 2
PD patients with depression that are candidates for STN DBS (n=5).
DBS parameters will be set to increase the DBS affected volume to include both the cognitive and limbic territories in addition to the dorso-lateral motor territories of the STN. This novel approach to parameter selection is directed to achieve improvement in cognitive and limbic as well as motor domains of PD. The patients will therefore be assessed for cognitive, limbic and motor state at multiple time points; there will be a baseline assessment prior to starting treatment (prior to DBS surgery and/or prior to parameters changes); thereafter assessments will follow the stimulation parameter changes; thereafter follow-up assessments at 6 - 12 months. Stimulation parameters will be changed every 2 weeks or earlier if an urgent clinical state emerges. Patients with depression will be monitored for antidepressant effects of stimulation changes. Patients without depression will be monitored for evidence of treatment emergent depression.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: 3
PD patients without depression that are candidates for STN DBS (n=10).
DBS parameters will be set to increase the DBS affected volume to include both the cognitive and limbic territories in addition to the dorso-lateral motor territories of the STN. This novel approach to parameter selection is directed to achieve improvement in cognitive and limbic as well as motor domains of PD. The patients will therefore be assessed for cognitive, limbic and motor state at multiple time points; there will be a baseline assessment prior to starting treatment (prior to DBS surgery and/or prior to parameters changes); thereafter assessments will follow the stimulation parameter changes; thereafter follow-up assessments at 6 - 12 months. Stimulation parameters will be changed every 2 weeks or earlier if an urgent clinical state emerges. Patients with depression will be monitored for antidepressant effects of stimulation changes. Patients without depression will be monitored for evidence of treatment emergent depression.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The primary outcome measure of the study will be the stimulation parameters of patients who fulfill criteria for MDD at the inception of trial and manifest remission (HAM-D21 score <7) after 4 months (or less) of DBS treatment.
Time Frame: 18 months
18 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Secondary outcome measures will be the relationship between improvement in mental status (as measured by HAM-21, BDI, CGI, HAM-A, BPRS and PDQ39) and change in PD symptoms (as measured by UPDRS).
Time Frame: 18 months
18 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Zvi Israel, MD, Hadassah Medical Organization
  • Study Chair: Hagai Bergman, MD, Hadassah Medical Organization
  • Study Chair: Bernard Lerer, MD, Hadassah Medical Organization

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2009

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

May 1, 2010

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

May 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 20, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 20, 2009

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

April 21, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

June 3, 2010

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 2, 2010

Last Verified

May 1, 2010

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Parkinson's Disease

Clinical Trials on DBS parameters setting

3
Subscribe