- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT00904020
A Study of the Effectiveness And Safety Of Lidoderm® As Add-On Treatment in Patients With Postherpetic Neuralgia, Diabetic Neuropathy, or Low Back Pain
December 29, 2023 updated by: Endo Pharmaceuticals
A Prospective, Open-Label, Multicenter Study of the Effectiveness And Safety Of Lidoderm® As Add-On Treatment in Patients With Postherpetic Neuralgia, Diabetic Neuropathy, or Low Back Pain
Patients with a diagnosis of postherpetic neuralgia (PHN), diabetic neuropathy (DN), or low back pain (LBP) who were currently receiving an analgesic regimen that contained gabapentin participated in a Phase IV clinical trial to assess the effectiveness of Lidoderm® administered once daily (q24h) after 14 day in the treatment of PHN, DN, or LBP in patients who had a partial response to a regimen containing gabapentin.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
107
Phase
- Phase 4
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Alabama
-
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
-
-
Arizona
-
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
-
-
Florida
-
Plantation, Florida, United States
-
-
Georgia
-
Marietta, Georgia, United States
-
-
Illinois
-
Burr Ridge, Illinois, United States
-
-
Kansas
-
Overland Park, Kansas, United States
-
-
New Jersey
-
Hackensack, New Jersey, United States
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Altoona, Pennsylvania, United States
-
-
Wisconsin
-
Cudahy, Wisconsin, United States
-
Greenfield, Wisconsin, United States
-
West Bend, Wisconsin, United States
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Were currently receiving an analgesic regimen that contained gabapentin
- Had been on a stable dose of gabapentin for at least 14 days (same dose ±10% for 14 days)
- Had a partial response to a gabapentin-containing analgesic regimen defined as an average daily pain intensity score of >4 on a ) to 10 scale, with 0 being no pain and 10 being pain as bas as the patients have ever imagined (Question 5 of the Brief Pain Inventory [BPI] within 24 hours prior to the screening visit
- For diabetic patients, had a hemoglobin A1c level <0.13 (normal range, 0.047-0.064)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Had a neurological condition other than that associated with their pain diagnosis that, in the opinion of the investigator, would have interfered with their ability to participate in the study
- Had received an epidural steroid/local anesthetic injection within 14 days prior to study entry
- Had received trigger point injections within 14 days prior to study entry
- Had received Botox injections within 3 months prior to study entry
- Were taking a lidocaine-containing product that could not be discontinued while receiving Lidoderm
- Were taking Class 1 anti-arrhythmic drugs (e.g., mexiletine, tocainide)
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: (1) Lidoderm
(1) Commercially available Lidoderm (lidocaine patch 5%) was provided to patients with up to four patches applied topically once daily (q24h) to the area of maximal peripheral pain.
|
Patients participated in a 2-week treatment period.
Commercially available Lidoderm (lidocaine patch 5%) was provided to patients with up to four patches applied topically once daily (q24h) to the area of maximal peripheral pain.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Average daily pain intensity (Brief Pain Inventory [BPI] Questions 3, 4, 5, and 6)
Time Frame: Visits - V2 (Day 0), V3 (Day 7), V4/EOS (Day 14)
|
Visits - V2 (Day 0), V3 (Day 7), V4/EOS (Day 14)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Pain quality using the Neuropathic Pain Scale (NPS)
Time Frame: Visits - V2 (Day 0), V3 (Day 7), V4/EOS (Day 14)
|
Visits - V2 (Day 0), V3 (Day 7), V4/EOS (Day 14)
|
|
Investigator and Patient Global Impression of Change
Time Frame: Visits - V2 (Day 0), V3 (Day 7), V4/EOS (Day 14)
|
Visits - V2 (Day 0), V3 (Day 7), V4/EOS (Day 14)
|
|
Extent of numbness at the site of pain using the Numbness Questionnaire
Time Frame: Visits - V2 (Day 0), V3 (Day 7), V4/EOS (Day 14)
|
Visits - V2 (Day 0), V3 (Day 7), V4/EOS (Day 14)
|
|
Patient Global Assessment of Pain Relief
Time Frame: Visits - V2 (Day 0), V3 (Day 7), V4/EOS (Day 14)
|
Visits - V2 (Day 0), V3 (Day 7), V4/EOS (Day 14)
|
|
Safety assessments included Adverse Events (AE), discontinuation due to AEs, physical and neurological examination results, vital signs, clinical laboratory data, sensory testing, numbness testing, and dermal assessments
Time Frame: Visits - V2 (Day 0), V3 (Day 7), V4/EOS (Day 14)
|
Visits - V2 (Day 0), V3 (Day 7), V4/EOS (Day 14)
|
|
QoL: Pain interference (BPI Question 9)
Time Frame: Visits - V2 (Day 0), V3 (Day 7), V4/EOS (Day 14)
|
Visits - V2 (Day 0), V3 (Day 7), V4/EOS (Day 14)
|
|
QoL: Patient Global Assessment of Patch Satisfaction
Time Frame: Visits - V2 (Day 0), V3 (Day 7), V4/EOS (Day 14)
|
Visits - V2 (Day 0), V3 (Day 7), V4/EOS (Day 14)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Director: Study Director, Endo Pharmaceuticals
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
June 1, 2002
Primary Completion (Actual)
November 1, 2002
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
May 15, 2009
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
May 18, 2009
First Posted (Estimated)
May 19, 2009
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
January 1, 2024
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
December 29, 2023
Last Verified
December 1, 2023
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Nervous System Diseases
- Pain
- Neurologic Manifestations
- Endocrine System Diseases
- Diabetes Complications
- Diabetes Mellitus
- Neuromuscular Diseases
- Peripheral Nervous System Diseases
- Back Pain
- Low Back Pain
- Neuralgia
- Diabetic Neuropathies
- Neuralgia, Postherpetic
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Anti-Arrhythmia Agents
- Central Nervous System Depressants
- Peripheral Nervous System Agents
- Sensory System Agents
- Anesthetics
- Membrane Transport Modulators
- Anesthetics, Local
- Voltage-Gated Sodium Channel Blockers
- Sodium Channel Blockers
- Lidocaine
Other Study ID Numbers
- EN3220-008
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.