Trial Evaluating the Safety and Effectiveness of NUBAC™ Disc Arthroplasty

May 14, 2014 updated by: Pioneer Surgical Technology, Inc.

A Prospective, Multi-center, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial Evaluating the Safety and Effectiveness of NUBAC™ Disc Arthroplasty

The NuBac device is indicated for reconstruction following nucleotomy in skeletally mature patients at least 18 years of age with symptomatic single level degenerative disc disease (DDD) at L4/L5 only.

DDD is defined as discogenic back pain with or without leg pain; with degeneration of the disc as confirmed by patient history, physical examination, radiographic studies showing: decreased disc height, contained herniated nucleus, vacuum phenomenon (dark disc) OR positive discography at the affected level.

These DDD patients should have no more than Grade 1 spondylolisthesis at the involved level and should have failed at least six months of conservative, non-operative care.

Demonstrate non-inferiority compared to ProDisc.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

STUDY DESIGN:

Multicenter, prospective, randomized (1:1), controlled study comparing the artificial nucleus to ProDisc. After implanting artificial nucleus in two patients during the training session, enrollment of randomized patients shall begin. The study is expected to be completed in four years.

NUMBER OF INVESTIGATIONAL SITES and INVESTIGATORS:

10 - 20 investigational sites, 1 to 2 investigators per site, approximately 20-40 patients per site

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Beverly Hills, California, United States, 90211
        • Spine Group Beverly Hills
      • Beverly Hills, California, United States, 90211
        • Tower Orthopedics & Sports Medicine
      • Colton, California, United States, 92324
        • Bergey Spine Institute
      • Loma Linda, California, United States, 92354
        • Loma Linda University - Faculty Physicians
    • Colorado
      • Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80045
        • University of Colorado, Anschutz Outpatient Pavilion
      • Loveland, Colorado, United States, 80538
        • The Spine Institute
    • Florida
      • Tampa, Florida, United States, 33637
        • Florida Orthopaedic Institute
    • Illinois
      • Oak Lawn, Illinois, United States, 60453
        • Bone & Joint Physicians
    • Kansas
      • Merriam, Kansas, United States, 66204
        • Heartland Hand & Spine Orthopedic Center
    • Michigan
      • Marquette, Michigan, United States, 49855
        • Orthopaedic Surgical Associates
    • Missouri
      • St. Louis, Missouri, United States, 63017
        • The Orthopedic Center of St. Louis
    • New York
      • Buffalo, New York, United States, 14224
        • Buffalo Neurosurgery
      • Johnson City, New York, United States, 13790
        • Southern New York NeuroSurgical Group
    • North Carolina
      • Charlotte, North Carolina, United States, 28204
        • Carolina Neurosurgery and Spine Associates
    • Oregon
      • Eugene, Oregon, United States, 97401
        • Neurospine Institute
    • Tennessee
      • Bristol, Tennessee, United States, 37620
        • Neurospine Solutions, PC
    • Wisconsin
      • Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States, 53211
        • Milwaukee Spinal Specialists

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • is at least 18 years of age and skeletally mature
  • must have symptomatic single level degenerative disc disease at L4/5 requiring surgical treatment
  • must have completed a minimum of six months of unsuccessful conservative, non-operative care
  • must have discogenic back pain with or without leg pain
  • must show radiographic confirmation using plain films, MRI, CT, myelogram or discography of one of the following: decreased disc height when compared to the adjacent level, contained herniated nucleus, or vacuum phenomenon (dark disc)
  • must score at least 40% on the Oswestry Disability Index
  • must score at least 4 on a 10cm Visual Analog Scale for back pain
  • is able to comply with the protocol's follow-up schedule
  • must understand and sign the informed consent document

Exclusion Criteria:

  • symptomatic DDD at more than one level
  • previous fusion at any lumbar level or laminectomy at the target level (discectomy, Intradiscal Electrothermal Annuloplasty, laminotomy, or nucleolysis performed > 6 months ago are permitted)
  • clinically compromised vertebral bodies, at the affected level due to previous trauma, i.e., compression or burst fracture
  • pars defect
  • involved vertebral endplate dimensionally smaller than 34.5 mm in the medial-lateral direction and/or 27 mm in the anterior-posterior direction
  • disc height less than 5 mm at the target level
  • bony stenosis
  • lytic spondylolisthesis, spondylolisthesis greater than 3mm
  • lumbar scoliosis greater than 11 degrees.
  • osteoporosis, osteopenia, osteomalacia, Paget's disease or metabolic bone disease
  • Schmorl's nodes, an incomplete annulus, or endplates that are not intact
  • spinal tumors
  • symptomatic facet joint disease
  • free fragment herniation confirmed radiographically
  • isolated radicular compression syndrome, especially due to a disc herniation
  • arachnoiditis
  • active infection or surgical site infection
  • is using any medication known to interfere with bone/soft tissue healing
  • rheumatoid arthritis or other autoimmune disease
  • systemic disease such as AIDS, HIV, hepatitis
  • morbid obesity defined as body mass index (BMI) >40 or a weight more than 100 lbs over ideal body weight
  • psychosocial disorders that would preclude accurate evaluation or has a history of substance abuse
  • active malignancy except non-melanoma skin cancer; history of any invasive malignancy unless treated and in remission for at least five years
  • documented allergies to metal or plastic; i.e., cobalt, chromium, molybdenum, polyethylene, titanium or polyetheretherketone
  • pregnancy, or interested in becoming pregnant within the next two years
  • prisoner
  • involvement in an investigational drug or device study within 30 days

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: NuBac
NuBac device implanted at the L4/5 level
NuBac device implanted at the L4/5 level.
Other Names:
  • nucleus replacement
  • disc arthroplasty
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Prodisc-L
Prodisc-L implanted at the L4/5 level.
Prodisc-L implanted at the L4/5 level.
Other Names:
  • Total disc replacement

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Participants With Improved Patient Function
Time Frame: 24 months

The comparison of results was based on the proportion of participants with improved outcomes.

The primary efficacy variable was treatment success based on the following criteria:

  1. Oswestry Disability Index score improved by at least 15 points
  2. Device success
  3. Neurological success
  4. Absence of major complications
  5. Absence of fusion at the index level A patient was considered a success upon meeting all five criteria. Failure to meet any of these criteria resulted in classification as a treatment failure.
24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Matthew Songer, MD, Orthopedic Surgery Associates

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2009

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

December 1, 2012

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

December 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 29, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 30, 2009

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

July 2, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

May 26, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 14, 2014

Last Verified

May 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • N012009

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Degenerative Disc Disease

3
Subscribe