Efficacy and Safety of Ranibizumab (Intravitreal Injections) in Patients With Visual Impairment Due to Diabetic Macular Edema (REVEAL)

September 18, 2012 updated by: Novartis

A Randomized, Double-masked, Multicenter, Laser Controlled Phase III Study Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of Ranibizumab (Intravitreal Injections) as Adjunctive and Monotherapy in Patients With Visual Impairment Due to Diabetic Macular Edema

This study was designed to confirm the efficacy and safety of ranibizumab (0.5 mg) as adjunctive therapy when added to laser photocoagulation and/or as monotherapy in Asian patients with visual impairment due to Diabetic Macular Edema (DME).

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

396

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Beijing, China
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Changsha, China
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Chengdu, China
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Chongqing, China
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Guangzhou, China
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Hangzhou, China
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Shanghai, China
        • Novartis Investigational Site
      • Wenzhou, China
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Xi'an, China
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Hong Kong, Hong Kong
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Chiba, Japan
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Chiyoda-ku, Japan
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Chuo-ku, Japan
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Fukuoka, Japan
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Fukushima, Japan
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Hirakata, Japan
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Kita-gun, Japan
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Kobe, Japan
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Kyoto, Japan
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Mitaka, Japan
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Nagoya, Japan
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Osaka, Japan
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Otsu, Japan
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Shimotsuke, Japan
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Shinjuku-ku, Japan
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Suita, Japan
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Toyko, Japan
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Urayasu, Japan
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Wakayama, Japan
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Yamagata, Japan
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Singapore, Singapore
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Kaohsiung, Taiwan
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • LinKou, Taiwan
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Taipei, Taiwan
        • Novartis Investigative Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes mellitus according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) or World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines with HbA1c not more than 10.0% at screening (Visit 1). Patients should be on diet, exercise, and/or pharmacological treatment for diabetes.
  • Patients with visual impairment due to focal or diffuse Diabetic Macular Edema in at least one eye who are eligible for laser treatment in the opinion of the investigator. If both eyes are eligible, the one with the worse visual acuity, as assessed at Visit 1, will be selected for study treatment unless, based on medical reasons, the investigator deems the other eye the more appropriate candidate for study treatment.
  • The study eye must fulfill the following criteria at Visit 1:

    • Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) score between 78 and 39 letters, inclusively, using Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy (ETDRS) chart-like visual acuity testing charts at a testing distance of 4 meters (approximate Snellen equivalent of 20/32 to 20/160).
    • Decrease in vision is due to DME and not due to other causes, in the opinion of the investigator.
    • Medication for the management of diabetes must have been stable within 3 months prior to randomization and is expected to remain stable during the course of the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Ocular concomitant conditions/ diseases:

    • Concomitant conditions in the study eye which could, in the opinion of the investigator, prevent the improvement of visual acuity on study treatment.
    • Active intraocular inflammation in either eye.
    • Any active infection in either eye.
    • History of uveitis in either eye.
    • Uncontrolled glaucoma in either eye.
  • Ocular treatments:

    • Panretinal laser photocoagulation in the study eye within 6 months prior to or during the study.
    • Focal/grid laser photocoagulation in the study eye within 3 months prior to study entry.
  • Systemic conditions or treatments:

    • History of stroke
    • Renal failure requiring dialysis or renal transplant or renal insufficiency with creatinine level > 2.0 mg/dL.
    • Untreated diabetes mellitus
    • Blood pressure systolic > 160 mmHg or diastolic > 100 mmHg
  • Compliance/ Administrative:

    • Pregnant or nursing (lactating) women

Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Adjunctive treatment
Adjunctive administration of ranibizumab 0.5 mg intravitreal injections and active laser.
Ranibizumab 0.5 mg intravitreal injection at day 1, month 1 and month 2. If stable vision not reached at month 3, one injection per month continued until stable vision was reached. Intravitreal injections re-initiated if needed.
Active laser treatment administered at day 1. Subsequent laser treatments administered if needed at intervals no shorter than 3 months from previous laser treatment.
Experimental: Monotherapy treatment
Monotherapy ranibizumab 0.5 mg intravitreal injections plus sham laser.
Ranibizumab 0.5 mg intravitreal injection at day 1, month 1 and month 2. If stable vision not reached at month 3, one injection per month continued until stable vision was reached. Intravitreal injections re-initiated if needed.
Sham laser treatment administered at day 1.
Active Comparator: Laser control
Active laser treatment plus sham intravitreal injections.
Active laser treatment administered at day 1. Subsequent laser treatments administered if needed at intervals no shorter than 3 months from previous laser treatment.
Sham intravitreal injections to ranibizumab at day 1, month 1 and month 2. Intravitreal injections re-initiated if needed.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Average Change From Baseline of Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Over 12 Months (From Month 1 to Month 12 Compared to Baseline)
Time Frame: 12 months
Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) letters was measured using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (EDTRS)-like chart while participants were in a sitting position at a testing distance of 4 meters. The range of EDTRS is 0 to 100 letters. A positive average change from baseline of BCVA indicates improvement.
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline on Central Retinal Subfield Thickness (CRST) at Month 12
Time Frame: 12 months
Central Retinal Subfield Thickness (CRST) was measured using Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) in micrometers. A negative change from baseline of CRST indicates improvement.
12 months
Percent of Participants With Anatomical Changes in Intra-retinal Cysts at End of Study Compared to Baseline
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Presence or absence of intra-retinal cysts in any of the 6 sections of the study eye was measured using Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT). A complete resolution or decrease from baseline of intra-retinal cysts indicates improvement.
Up to 12 months
Percent of Participants With Anatomical Changes in Sub-retinal Fluid at End of Study Compared to Baseline
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Presence or absence of sub-retinal fluid in any of the 6 sections of the study eye was measured using Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT). A complete resolution or decrease from baseline of sub-retinal fluid indicates improvement.
Up to 12 months
Percent of Participants With Visual Acuity Above 73 Letters at Month 12
Time Frame: 12 months
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)-like chart at baseline and month 12 while participants were in a sitting position at a testing distance of 4 meters. The range of EDTRS is 0 to 100 letters. BCVA above 73 letters at month 12 indicates a positive outcome.
12 months
Percent of Participants Who Gained >= 10 Letters at Month 12 Compared to Baseline
Time Frame: 12 months
Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) letters was measured using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (EDTRS)-like chart while participants were in a sitting position at a testing distance of 4 meters. The range of EDTRS is 0 to 100 letters. A gain of 10 or more BCVA letters from baseline indicates improvement. A BCVA of 84 letters or more at Month 12 indicates improvement.
12 months
Percent of Participants Who Lost >= 10 Letters at Month 12 Compared to Baseline
Time Frame: 12 months
Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) letters was measured using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (EDTRS)-like chart while participants were in a sitting position at a testing distance of 4 meters. The range of EDTRS is 0 to 100 letters. A loss of 10 or more BCVA letters from baseline indicates worsening.
12 months
Percent of Participants Who Gained >= 15 Letters at Month 12 Compared to Baseline
Time Frame: 12 months
Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) letters was measured using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (EDTRS)-like chart while participants were in a sitting position at a testing distance of 4 meters. The range of EDTRS is 0 to 100 letters. A gain of 15 or more BCVA letters from baseline indicates improvement. A BCVA of 84 letters or more at Month 12 indicates improvement.
12 months
Percent of Participants Who Lost >= 15 Letters at Month 12 Compared to Baseline
Time Frame: 12 months
Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) letters was measured using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (EDTRS)-like chart while participants were in a sitting position at a testing distance of 4 meters. The range of EDTRS is 0 to 100 letters. A loss of 15 or more BCVA letters from baseline indicates worsening.
12 months
Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Mean Change From Baseline at Month 12
Time Frame: 12 months
Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) letters was measured using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (EDTRS)-like chart while participants were in a sitting position at a testing distance of 4 meters. The range of EDTRS is 0 to 100 letters. A positive change from baseline of BCVA indicates improvement.
12 months
Patient Outcome Measure Euro Quality of Life Questionnaire (EQ-5D)
Time Frame: 12 months
The Euro Quality of Life Questionnaire (EQ-5D) standardized instrument was utilized to measure health outcomes related to mobility, self care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Participants self-rate their health on a visual, vertical analogue scale from 0 to 100 where the endpoints are labeled "Best imaginable health state" (100) and "worst imaginable health state" (0).
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 2, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 5, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

October 6, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

October 18, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 18, 2012

Last Verified

September 1, 2012

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetic Macular Edema

Clinical Trials on Ranibizumab

Subscribe