Biomarkers for Outcomes In Late-life Depression (BOLD) (BOLD)

April 15, 2013 updated by: Ian A. Cook, M.D., University of California, Los Angeles

Biomarkers for Outcomes In Late-life Depression

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a common psychiatric illness with high cost to society and individual patients. One reason for the high cost is that most patients endure lengthy and ultimately unsuccessful empiric antidepressant trials before a successful medication is identified by trial-and-error. Care would be improved if a biomarker could determine, early in the course of treatment, whether a particular antidepressant would likely lead to response, remission, or treatment failure. Physicians could rapidly change treatments to an antidepressant which the biomarker indicated would be likely to help the patient. We have identified quantitative electroencephalographic (QEEG) changes that emerge early in the course of treatment with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) that appear to predict later response and remission in a general adult patient population. Demographic trends in the United States suggest that improved care for MDD will be essential for a growing number of elderly with late-life depression. While the consequences of prolonged trial-and-error periods to find a successful treatment are particularly inauspicious for elders with late-life depression, this patient group has not been included in the past studies which demonstrated the use of this biomarker approach in a general adult population. We propose a 12-week treatment trial to evaluate a practical biomarker for predicting outcome based on data from the first week of antidepressant treatment, with a focus only on depression in late life (age ≥65).

There are three study Hypothesis:

H1) ATR prediction of treatment outcome in older subjects will show >70% accuracy.

H2) The predictive accuracy of the model will be enhanced by including clinical, socio-demographic, and genetic predictors.

H3) The accuracy of ATR prediction will not show a significant dependence on subject gender.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

80

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90095
        • UCLA Semel Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

62 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 62 years of age or older
  • Meet the DSM-IV diagnosis of MDD based on Sheehan's Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI), with a score of > 28 on the 30-item Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Self Rated version (IDS-SR30)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects will have no unstable medical illness that would prevent completion of participation in the trial, determined as needed from physical examination, ECG, laboratory safety tests, as well as a review of systems
  • mentally or legally incapacitated, unable to give informed consent
  • meets DSM-IV criteria for anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, obsessive-compulsive disorder, any cognitive disorder, bipolar disorder, psychotic disorder, or major depression with psychotic features
  • MMSE (Folstein et al., 1975) score ≤ 24
  • evidence of drug dependency or substance abuse within the preceding nine months
  • stable and in remission on current psychotropic medication(s)
  • any ECT within the past six months
  • failure to tolerate ESC or treatment failure with an adequate trial of ESC in the current episode
  • ESC would be contraindicated (e.g., hyponatremia with a prior SSRI)
  • treatment with fluoxetine or an MAOI within the past four weeks
  • any medical illness severe enough to significantly affect brain function or to interfere with interpretation of study results
  • history of seizures, brain surgery, skull fracture, significant head trauma, or abnormal EEG
  • psychiatric hospitalization indicated (e.g., imminent danger to self or others)
  • initial QEEG recording is contaminated with artifact so that determination of the biomarker is precluded
  • use of medications known to affect brain function (e.g., antidepressants, anticonvulsants/mood stabilizers, anticholinergics, antipsychotics, benzodiazepines - same list as in BRITE-MD)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: escitalopram
All subjects will receive escitalopram (ESC), brand name Lexapro (Forest Laboratories, Inc., New York) throughout the study. Dosing will start at 5 mg/d, be titrated to 10 mg after 4 days, and continue at 10 mg/d thereafter; an additional dose titration to 20 mg will be pursued at week 8 for those not significantly better (<50% improvement on IDS-30 at week 8 visit) and as tolerated.
Start at 5mg per day, after four days increase to 10mg per day for the duration of the study. 20 mg will be administered at week 8 if not significantly better.
Other Names:
  • Lexapro

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Score on Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D)
Time Frame: Measured nine times over 8 weeks
Measured nine times over 8 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Score on Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician Rated (IDS-C30)
Time Frame: Measured nine times over 8 weeks
Measured nine times over 8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ian A Cook, MD, University of California, Los Angeles

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 5, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 5, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

March 8, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 16, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 15, 2013

Last Verified

April 1, 2013

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Major Depressive Disorder

Clinical Trials on Escitalopram

3
Subscribe