An Open-Label, 2-Cohort, Multicenter, Study of Lenvatinib in Previously Treated Subjects With Unresectable Stage III or Stage IV Melanoma

October 23, 2019 updated by: Eisai Inc.

An Open-Label, 2-Cohort, Multicenter, Phase 2 Study of E7080 (Lenvatinib) in Previously Treated Subjects With Unresectable Stage III or Stage IV Melanoma

The purpose of this study is to assess the objective response rate of lenvatinib in previously treated participants with American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) unresectable Stage III or Stage IV melanoma and disease progression.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This was a Phase 2, multicenter, open-label, 2-cohort, 2-stage study that assessed the ORR of lenvatinib in previously treated participants with AJCC unresectable Stage III or Stage IV melanoma and disease progression. Cohort 1 enrolled participants not harboring the V600E BRAF mutation with disease progression following up to 2 prior systemic anticancer regimens (excluding anti-VEGF) for unresectable Stage III or Stage IV melanoma, and is referred to as Cohort 1 or V600E BRAF negative. Other less common BRAF activating mutations were allowed as long as the participant did not receive a BRAF-targeted therapy. Cohort 2 enrolled participants harboring the activating BRAF mutations (mainly the V600E mutation) with disease progression following BRAF V600E-targeted therapy, and is referred to as Cohort 2 or V600E BRAF positive. Eligible participants had measurable disease according to RECIST 1.1.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

182

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Adelaide, Australia
      • Malvern, Australia
      • Newcastle, Australia
      • North Sydney, Australia
      • Perth, Australia
      • Westmead, Australia
      • Essen, Germany
      • Hannover, Germany
      • Heidelberg, Germany
      • Kiel, Germany
      • Mainz, Germany
      • Tubingen, Germany
      • Glasgow, United Kingdom
      • London, United Kingdom
      • Nottingham, United Kingdom
      • Surrey, United Kingdom
    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States
    • Arizona
      • Tucson, Arizona, United States
    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States
      • San Francisco, California, United States
    • Colorado
      • Aurora, Colorado, United States
      • Boulder, Colorado, United States
      • Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States
      • Denver, Colorado, United States
      • Lakewood, Colorado, United States
      • Littleton, Colorado, United States
      • Lone Tree, Colorado, United States
      • Longmont, Colorado, United States
      • Parker, Colorado, United States
      • Thornton, Colorado, United States
    • Florida
      • Bonita Springs, Florida, United States
      • Bradenton, Florida, United States
      • Cape Coral, Florida, United States
      • Clearwater, Florida, United States
      • Englewood, Florida, United States
      • Fort Myers, Florida, United States
      • Gainesville, Florida, United States
      • Naples, Florida, United States
      • North Port, Florida, United States
      • Orlando, Florida, United States
      • Palm Harbor, Florida, United States
      • Port Charlotte, Florida, United States
      • Sarasota, Florida, United States
      • Sebring, Florida, United States
      • Tampa, Florida, United States
      • Venice, Florida, United States
    • Kentucky
      • Louisville, Kentucky, United States
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States
    • Michigan
      • Detroit, Michigan, United States
    • Minnesota
      • Burnsville, Minnesota, United States
      • Coon Rapids, Minnesota, United States
      • Edina, Minnesota, United States
      • Fridley, Minnesota, United States
      • Maplewood, Minnesota, United States
      • Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
      • Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States
      • Woodbury, Minnesota, United States
    • Mississippi
      • Southaven, Mississippi, United States
    • Missouri
      • Saint Louis, Missouri, United States
    • Nevada
      • Henderson, Nevada, United States
      • Las Vegas, Nevada, United States
    • New Hampshire
      • Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States
    • New Jersey
      • Morristown, New Jersey, United States
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States
    • Ohio
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States
    • Oregon
      • Eugene, Oregon, United States
      • Portland, Oregon, United States
      • Springfield, Oregon, United States
      • Tualatin, Oregon, United States
    • Pennsylvania
      • Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, United States
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
    • Tennessee
      • Bartlett, Tennessee, United States
      • Franklin, Tennessee, United States
      • Gallatin, Tennessee, United States
      • Germantown, Tennessee, United States
      • Hermitage, Tennessee, United States
      • Lebanon, Tennessee, United States
      • Memphis, Tennessee, United States
      • Murfreesboro, Tennessee, United States
      • Nashville, Tennessee, United States
      • Smyrna, Tennessee, United States
    • Texas
      • Bedford, Texas, United States
      • Dallas, Texas, United States
      • Grapevine, Texas, United States
      • Houston, Texas, United States
    • Virginia
      • Arlington, Virginia, United States
      • Fairfax, Virginia, United States
      • Gainesville, Virginia, United States
      • Leesburg, Virginia, United States
      • Winchester, Virginia, United States
      • Woodbridge, Virginia, United States
    • Washington
      • Vancouver, Washington, United States
    • Wisconsin
      • Madison, Wisconsin, United States

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 99 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Histologically confirmed diagnosis of melanoma.
  2. Unresectable Stage III or Stage IV melanoma.
  3. Evidence of disease progression according to RECIST 1.1 on prior regimen.
  4. Participants with brain metastases will be eligible if they have undergone complete surgical excision and are more then 1 month post surgery with no radiographic evidence of disease recurrence in the brain or have undergone stereotactic radio surgery (gamma knife procedure) and are more then 1 month post procedure and with no radiographic evidence of disease progression in the brain; and are asymptomatic, and discontinued corticosteroid treatment at least 30 days prior starting treatment.
  5. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1.
  6. Adequately controlled blood pressure.
  7. Adequate renal function, bone marrow function, blood coagulation function, and liver function, as defined in the study protocol.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Melanoma of intraocular origin.
  2. Leptomeningeal metastases or brain metastases except as for participants with brain metastases will be eligible if they have undergone complete surgical excision and are more then 1 month post surgery with no radiographic evidence of disease recurrence in the brain or have undergone stereotactic radio surgery (gamma knife procedure) and are more then 1 month post procedure and with no radiographic evidence of disease progression in the brain; and are asymptomatic, and discontinued corticosteroid treatment at least 30 days prior starting treatment.
  3. More than 2 prior systemic anticancer regimen treatments including immunotherapies for unresectable Stage III or Stage IV disease (if BRAF V600E mutation negative) or not previously treated with BRAF V600E-targeted therapy or received in the past more than 2 prior systemic anticancer regimen treatments, including immunotherapies, in addition to a BRAF-V600E-targeted therapy (if BRAF V600E mutation positive).
  4. Significant cardiovascular impairment.
  5. Bleeding disorder or a thrombotic disorder requiring anticoagulant therapy.
  6. Females who are pregnant or breastfeeding.
  7. Prolongation of QTc interval to greater than 480 msec.
  8. 24 hour urine protein greater than or equal to 1 gm.
  9. Active hemoptysis within 3 wks prior to the first dose of study drug.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NON_RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Cohort 1 (V600E BRAF negative)
Cohort 1 (V600E BRAF negative) enrolled participants not harboring the V600E BRAF mutation with disease progression following up to 2 prior systemic anticancer regimens (excluding anti-VEGF) for unresectable Stage III or Stage IV melanoma.
Participants received lenvatinib 24 mg orally, once daily continuously in 28-day cycles until disease progression, development of unacceptable toxicity or withdrawal of consent.
Other Names:
  • E7080
EXPERIMENTAL: Cohort 2 (V600E BRAF positive)
Cohort 2 (V600E BRAF positive) enrolled participants harboring the activating BRAF mutations (mainly the V600E mutation) with disease progression following BRAF V600E-targeted therapy.
Participants received lenvatinib 24 mg orally, once daily continuously in 28-day cycles until disease progression, development of unacceptable toxicity or withdrawal of consent.
Other Names:
  • E7080

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Objective Response Rate (ORR)
Time Frame: From date of treatment start until all participants completed a minimum of 6 cycles (28-day cycles) or discontinued treatment prior to end of Cycle 6 (up to 24 weeks)
ORR, (ORR = CR + PR) was defined as the percentage of participants in each cohort who had a best overall response (BOR) of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) based on Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 for target lesions assessed by magnetic resonance imaging/computed tomography (MRI/CT) scans and independent radiologic review (IRR). A BOR of CR required confirmation by a subsequent CR assessment at least 4 weeks later. A BOR of PR required confirmation by a subsequent assessment of CR or PR at least 4 weeks later. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (target or non-target) had to have a reduction in short axis to less than (<)10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30 percent (%) decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.
From date of treatment start until all participants completed a minimum of 6 cycles (28-day cycles) or discontinued treatment prior to end of Cycle 6 (up to 24 weeks)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Progression Free Survival (PFS)
Time Frame: From date of treatment start until documentation of disease progression or death from any cause (whichever occurred first) or up to data cutoff (Cohort 1; 15 Jan 2012 and Cohort 2; 15 Apr 2013), up to approximately 2 years 8 months
PFS was measured as the time from the date of first administration of study treatment until the date of first documentation of disease progression or date of death from any cause (whichever occurred first), as determined by IRR and Investigator based on RECIST v1.1. Disease progression per RECIST v1.1 was defined as at least a 20% relative increase and 5 mm absolute increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions (taking as reference the smallest sum on study) recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions. PFS was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier (1958) product-limit estimates. Data were presented with 2-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) when an adequate number of at risk participants warranted the estimates in the table below.
From date of treatment start until documentation of disease progression or death from any cause (whichever occurred first) or up to data cutoff (Cohort 1; 15 Jan 2012 and Cohort 2; 15 Apr 2013), up to approximately 2 years 8 months
Overall Survival (OS)
Time Frame: From date of treatment start until date of death from any cause or up to data cutoff (Cohort 1; 15 Jan 2012 and Cohort 2; 15 Apr 2013), up to approximately 2 years 8 months
OS was defined as the length of time in months from the date of first administration of study drug until the date of death from any cause, and was based on the data cutoff date for each cohort. OS was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier (1958) product-limit estimates. Data were presented with 2-sided 95% CI when an adequate number of at risk participants warranted the estimates in the table below.
From date of treatment start until date of death from any cause or up to data cutoff (Cohort 1; 15 Jan 2012 and Cohort 2; 15 Apr 2013), up to approximately 2 years 8 months
Disease Control Rate (DCR)
Time Frame: From date of treatment start until documentation of disease progression or death from any cause (whichever occurred first) or up to data cutoff (Cohort 1; 15 Jan 2012 and Cohort 2; 15 Apr 2013), up to approximately 2 years 8 months
DCR, (DCR = CR + PR + SD) was defined as the percentage of participants who had a BOR of CR or PR or stable disease (SD) based on RECIST v1.1 for target lesions assessed by MRI/CT and IRR. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions, any pathological lymph nodes (target or non-target) had to have a reduction in short axis to <10 mm.; PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR. SD defined as reduction in tumor volume of < 30% or an increase in the volume of 1 or more measurable lesions of < 25% without the appearance of any new lesions which was neither tumor shrinkage corresponding to PR nor tumor expansion corresponding to disease progression. BOR of SD, time from first administration of study drug until date of documented SD needed to be >=7 weeks based on IRR and Investigator's assessment.
From date of treatment start until documentation of disease progression or death from any cause (whichever occurred first) or up to data cutoff (Cohort 1; 15 Jan 2012 and Cohort 2; 15 Apr 2013), up to approximately 2 years 8 months
Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR)
Time Frame: From date of treatment start until documentation of disease progression or death from any cause (whichever occurred first) or up to data cutoff (Cohort 1; 15 Jan 2012 and Cohort 2; 15 Apr 2013), up to approximately 2 years 8 months
CBR, (CBR = CR + PR + durable SD rate) was defined as the percentage of participants who had a BOR of CR or PR or durable SD (dSD, SD lasting >=23 weeks) based on RECIST v1.1 for target lesions assessed by MRI/CT, IRR and Investigator's assessment. A BOR of CR required confirmation by a subsequent CR assessment at least 4 weeks later. A BOR of PR required confirmation by a subsequent assessment of CR or PR at least 4 weeks later. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions, any pathological lymph nodes (target or non-target) had to have a reduction in short axis to less than 10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters; OR = CR + PR. A BOR of dSD, the time from the first administration of study drug until the date of documented dSD needed to be ≥23 weeks based on IRR and Investigator's assessment.
From date of treatment start until documentation of disease progression or death from any cause (whichever occurred first) or up to data cutoff (Cohort 1; 15 Jan 2012 and Cohort 2; 15 Apr 2013), up to approximately 2 years 8 months
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)/ Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability of Lenvatinib
Time Frame: From date of treatment start up to 30 days after the last dose, or up to data cutoff (Cohort 1; 15 Jan 2012 and Cohort 2; 15 Apr 2013), up to approximately 2 years 9 months
Safety was assessed by monitoring and recording all AEs including all Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grades and SAEs; regular monitoring of hematology, clinical chemistry, and urine values; physical examinations; and regular measurement of vital signs, electrocardiograms (ECGs), and multi-gated acquisition (MUGA) scans or echocardiogram.
From date of treatment start up to 30 days after the last dose, or up to data cutoff (Cohort 1; 15 Jan 2012 and Cohort 2; 15 Apr 2013), up to approximately 2 years 9 months
Change From Baseline in the Concentration of Clinical Biomarkers in Whole Blood
Time Frame: Cycle 1 Day 15 (C1 D15), Cycle 2 Day 1 (C2 D1), Cycle 3 Day 1 (C3 D1), Off-Treatment/Phase Visit 98 (V98)
Blood samples were drawn at specific time points. Utilizing a standard protocol, the deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) from whole blood was extracted and analyzed for specific biomarkers of absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion of lenvatinib. Some of the biomarkers analyzed included; Angiopoietin, Epidermal Growth Factor (EGF), Fibroblast Growth Factor (FGF), FMS Like Tyrosine Kinase 3 Ligand (Flt3l) Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor (G-CSF), Granulocyte Macro Colony Stimulating Factor (GM-CSF), Interleukin 1 Receptor Antagonist (IL-1RA), Interferon (IFN), Macrophage Inflammatory Protein (MIP) 1 alpha, Platelet Derived Growth Factor (PDGF), Stromal Cell Derived Factor (SDF) 1 alpha, Interleukin (IL), Transforming Growth Factor (TGF), Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF), Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF).
Cycle 1 Day 15 (C1 D15), Cycle 2 Day 1 (C2 D1), Cycle 3 Day 1 (C3 D1), Off-Treatment/Phase Visit 98 (V98)
Summary of Plasma Concentration of Lenvatinib
Time Frame: Predose and 2 to 12 hours postdose at Cycle 1 Day 1 (C1D1), Cycle 1 Day 15 (C1D15), and Cycle 2 Day 1 (C2D1)
Blood samples for the quantification of lenvatinib in plasma were obtained and processed using a standardized protocol. The lower limit of quantification was 0.25 ng/mL. Pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis was conducted using nonlinear mixed effects modeling. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize lenvatinib plasma concentration data.
Predose and 2 to 12 hours postdose at Cycle 1 Day 1 (C1D1), Cycle 1 Day 15 (C1D15), and Cycle 2 Day 1 (C2D1)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Eisai US Medical Services, Eisai Limited

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

August 1, 2010

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

April 1, 2013

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

November 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 2, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 3, 2010

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

June 4, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

November 13, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 23, 2019

Last Verified

November 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stage IV Melanoma

Clinical Trials on Lenvatinib

Subscribe