- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01136967
An Open-Label, 2-Cohort, Multicenter, Study of Lenvatinib in Previously Treated Subjects With Unresectable Stage III or Stage IV Melanoma
October 23, 2019 updated by: Eisai Inc.
An Open-Label, 2-Cohort, Multicenter, Phase 2 Study of E7080 (Lenvatinib) in Previously Treated Subjects With Unresectable Stage III or Stage IV Melanoma
The purpose of this study is to assess the objective response rate of lenvatinib in previously treated participants with American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) unresectable Stage III or Stage IV melanoma and disease progression.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This was a Phase 2, multicenter, open-label, 2-cohort, 2-stage study that assessed the ORR of lenvatinib in previously treated participants with AJCC unresectable Stage III or Stage IV melanoma and disease progression.
Cohort 1 enrolled participants not harboring the V600E BRAF mutation with disease progression following up to 2 prior systemic anticancer regimens (excluding anti-VEGF) for unresectable Stage III or Stage IV melanoma, and is referred to as Cohort 1 or V600E BRAF negative.
Other less common BRAF activating mutations were allowed as long as the participant did not receive a BRAF-targeted therapy.
Cohort 2 enrolled participants harboring the activating BRAF mutations (mainly the V600E mutation) with disease progression following BRAF V600E-targeted therapy, and is referred to as Cohort 2 or V600E BRAF positive.
Eligible participants had measurable disease according to RECIST 1.1.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
182
Phase
- Phase 2
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Adelaide, Australia
-
Malvern, Australia
-
Newcastle, Australia
-
North Sydney, Australia
-
Perth, Australia
-
Westmead, Australia
-
-
-
-
-
Essen, Germany
-
Hannover, Germany
-
Heidelberg, Germany
-
Kiel, Germany
-
Mainz, Germany
-
Tubingen, Germany
-
-
-
-
-
Glasgow, United Kingdom
-
London, United Kingdom
-
Nottingham, United Kingdom
-
Surrey, United Kingdom
-
-
-
-
Alabama
-
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
-
-
Arizona
-
Tucson, Arizona, United States
-
-
California
-
Los Angeles, California, United States
-
San Francisco, California, United States
-
-
Colorado
-
Aurora, Colorado, United States
-
Boulder, Colorado, United States
-
Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States
-
Denver, Colorado, United States
-
Lakewood, Colorado, United States
-
Littleton, Colorado, United States
-
Lone Tree, Colorado, United States
-
Longmont, Colorado, United States
-
Parker, Colorado, United States
-
Thornton, Colorado, United States
-
-
Florida
-
Bonita Springs, Florida, United States
-
Bradenton, Florida, United States
-
Cape Coral, Florida, United States
-
Clearwater, Florida, United States
-
Englewood, Florida, United States
-
Fort Myers, Florida, United States
-
Gainesville, Florida, United States
-
Naples, Florida, United States
-
North Port, Florida, United States
-
Orlando, Florida, United States
-
Palm Harbor, Florida, United States
-
Port Charlotte, Florida, United States
-
Sarasota, Florida, United States
-
Sebring, Florida, United States
-
Tampa, Florida, United States
-
Venice, Florida, United States
-
-
Kentucky
-
Louisville, Kentucky, United States
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
-
-
Michigan
-
Detroit, Michigan, United States
-
-
Minnesota
-
Burnsville, Minnesota, United States
-
Coon Rapids, Minnesota, United States
-
Edina, Minnesota, United States
-
Fridley, Minnesota, United States
-
Maplewood, Minnesota, United States
-
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
-
Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States
-
Woodbury, Minnesota, United States
-
-
Mississippi
-
Southaven, Mississippi, United States
-
-
Missouri
-
Saint Louis, Missouri, United States
-
-
Nevada
-
Henderson, Nevada, United States
-
Las Vegas, Nevada, United States
-
-
New Hampshire
-
Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States
-
-
New Jersey
-
Morristown, New Jersey, United States
-
-
New York
-
New York, New York, United States
-
-
Ohio
-
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
-
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
-
Columbus, Ohio, United States
-
-
Oregon
-
Eugene, Oregon, United States
-
Portland, Oregon, United States
-
Springfield, Oregon, United States
-
Tualatin, Oregon, United States
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, United States
-
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
-
-
Tennessee
-
Bartlett, Tennessee, United States
-
Franklin, Tennessee, United States
-
Gallatin, Tennessee, United States
-
Germantown, Tennessee, United States
-
Hermitage, Tennessee, United States
-
Lebanon, Tennessee, United States
-
Memphis, Tennessee, United States
-
Murfreesboro, Tennessee, United States
-
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
-
Smyrna, Tennessee, United States
-
-
Texas
-
Bedford, Texas, United States
-
Dallas, Texas, United States
-
Grapevine, Texas, United States
-
Houston, Texas, United States
-
-
Virginia
-
Arlington, Virginia, United States
-
Fairfax, Virginia, United States
-
Gainesville, Virginia, United States
-
Leesburg, Virginia, United States
-
Winchester, Virginia, United States
-
Woodbridge, Virginia, United States
-
-
Washington
-
Vancouver, Washington, United States
-
-
Wisconsin
-
Madison, Wisconsin, United States
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 99 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Histologically confirmed diagnosis of melanoma.
- Unresectable Stage III or Stage IV melanoma.
- Evidence of disease progression according to RECIST 1.1 on prior regimen.
- Participants with brain metastases will be eligible if they have undergone complete surgical excision and are more then 1 month post surgery with no radiographic evidence of disease recurrence in the brain or have undergone stereotactic radio surgery (gamma knife procedure) and are more then 1 month post procedure and with no radiographic evidence of disease progression in the brain; and are asymptomatic, and discontinued corticosteroid treatment at least 30 days prior starting treatment.
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1.
- Adequately controlled blood pressure.
- Adequate renal function, bone marrow function, blood coagulation function, and liver function, as defined in the study protocol.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Melanoma of intraocular origin.
- Leptomeningeal metastases or brain metastases except as for participants with brain metastases will be eligible if they have undergone complete surgical excision and are more then 1 month post surgery with no radiographic evidence of disease recurrence in the brain or have undergone stereotactic radio surgery (gamma knife procedure) and are more then 1 month post procedure and with no radiographic evidence of disease progression in the brain; and are asymptomatic, and discontinued corticosteroid treatment at least 30 days prior starting treatment.
- More than 2 prior systemic anticancer regimen treatments including immunotherapies for unresectable Stage III or Stage IV disease (if BRAF V600E mutation negative) or not previously treated with BRAF V600E-targeted therapy or received in the past more than 2 prior systemic anticancer regimen treatments, including immunotherapies, in addition to a BRAF-V600E-targeted therapy (if BRAF V600E mutation positive).
- Significant cardiovascular impairment.
- Bleeding disorder or a thrombotic disorder requiring anticoagulant therapy.
- Females who are pregnant or breastfeeding.
- Prolongation of QTc interval to greater than 480 msec.
- 24 hour urine protein greater than or equal to 1 gm.
- Active hemoptysis within 3 wks prior to the first dose of study drug.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: NON_RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: NONE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Cohort 1 (V600E BRAF negative)
Cohort 1 (V600E BRAF negative) enrolled participants not harboring the V600E BRAF mutation with disease progression following up to 2 prior systemic anticancer regimens (excluding anti-VEGF) for unresectable Stage III or Stage IV melanoma.
|
Participants received lenvatinib 24 mg orally, once daily continuously in 28-day cycles until disease progression, development of unacceptable toxicity or withdrawal of consent.
Other Names:
|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Cohort 2 (V600E BRAF positive)
Cohort 2 (V600E BRAF positive) enrolled participants harboring the activating BRAF mutations (mainly the V600E mutation) with disease progression following BRAF V600E-targeted therapy.
|
Participants received lenvatinib 24 mg orally, once daily continuously in 28-day cycles until disease progression, development of unacceptable toxicity or withdrawal of consent.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Objective Response Rate (ORR)
Time Frame: From date of treatment start until all participants completed a minimum of 6 cycles (28-day cycles) or discontinued treatment prior to end of Cycle 6 (up to 24 weeks)
|
ORR, (ORR = CR + PR) was defined as the percentage of participants in each cohort who had a best overall response (BOR) of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) based on Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 for target lesions assessed by magnetic resonance imaging/computed tomography (MRI/CT) scans and independent radiologic review (IRR).
A BOR of CR required confirmation by a subsequent CR assessment at least 4 weeks later.
A BOR of PR required confirmation by a subsequent assessment of CR or PR at least 4 weeks later.
CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions.
Any pathological lymph nodes (target or non-target) had to have a reduction in short axis to less than (<)10 mm.
PR was defined as at least a 30 percent (%) decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.
|
From date of treatment start until all participants completed a minimum of 6 cycles (28-day cycles) or discontinued treatment prior to end of Cycle 6 (up to 24 weeks)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Progression Free Survival (PFS)
Time Frame: From date of treatment start until documentation of disease progression or death from any cause (whichever occurred first) or up to data cutoff (Cohort 1; 15 Jan 2012 and Cohort 2; 15 Apr 2013), up to approximately 2 years 8 months
|
PFS was measured as the time from the date of first administration of study treatment until the date of first documentation of disease progression or date of death from any cause (whichever occurred first), as determined by IRR and Investigator based on RECIST v1.1.
Disease progression per RECIST v1.1 was defined as at least a 20% relative increase and 5 mm absolute increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions (taking as reference the smallest sum on study) recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions.
PFS was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier (1958) product-limit estimates.
Data were presented with 2-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) when an adequate number of at risk participants warranted the estimates in the table below.
|
From date of treatment start until documentation of disease progression or death from any cause (whichever occurred first) or up to data cutoff (Cohort 1; 15 Jan 2012 and Cohort 2; 15 Apr 2013), up to approximately 2 years 8 months
|
|
Overall Survival (OS)
Time Frame: From date of treatment start until date of death from any cause or up to data cutoff (Cohort 1; 15 Jan 2012 and Cohort 2; 15 Apr 2013), up to approximately 2 years 8 months
|
OS was defined as the length of time in months from the date of first administration of study drug until the date of death from any cause, and was based on the data cutoff date for each cohort.
OS was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier (1958) product-limit estimates.
Data were presented with 2-sided 95% CI when an adequate number of at risk participants warranted the estimates in the table below.
|
From date of treatment start until date of death from any cause or up to data cutoff (Cohort 1; 15 Jan 2012 and Cohort 2; 15 Apr 2013), up to approximately 2 years 8 months
|
|
Disease Control Rate (DCR)
Time Frame: From date of treatment start until documentation of disease progression or death from any cause (whichever occurred first) or up to data cutoff (Cohort 1; 15 Jan 2012 and Cohort 2; 15 Apr 2013), up to approximately 2 years 8 months
|
DCR, (DCR = CR + PR + SD) was defined as the percentage of participants who had a BOR of CR or PR or stable disease (SD) based on RECIST v1.1 for target lesions assessed by MRI/CT and IRR.
CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions, any pathological lymph nodes (target or non-target) had to have a reduction in short axis to <10 mm.; PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR.
SD defined as reduction in tumor volume of < 30% or an increase in the volume of 1 or more measurable lesions of < 25% without the appearance of any new lesions which was neither tumor shrinkage corresponding to PR nor tumor expansion corresponding to disease progression.
BOR of SD, time from first administration of study drug until date of documented SD needed to be >=7 weeks based on IRR and Investigator's assessment.
|
From date of treatment start until documentation of disease progression or death from any cause (whichever occurred first) or up to data cutoff (Cohort 1; 15 Jan 2012 and Cohort 2; 15 Apr 2013), up to approximately 2 years 8 months
|
|
Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR)
Time Frame: From date of treatment start until documentation of disease progression or death from any cause (whichever occurred first) or up to data cutoff (Cohort 1; 15 Jan 2012 and Cohort 2; 15 Apr 2013), up to approximately 2 years 8 months
|
CBR, (CBR = CR + PR + durable SD rate) was defined as the percentage of participants who had a BOR of CR or PR or durable SD (dSD, SD lasting >=23 weeks) based on RECIST v1.1 for target lesions assessed by MRI/CT, IRR and Investigator's assessment.
A BOR of CR required confirmation by a subsequent CR assessment at least 4 weeks later.
A BOR of PR required confirmation by a subsequent assessment of CR or PR at least 4 weeks later.
CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions, any pathological lymph nodes (target or non-target) had to have a reduction in short axis to less than 10 mm.
PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters; OR = CR + PR.
A BOR of dSD, the time from the first administration of study drug until the date of documented dSD needed to be ≥23 weeks based on IRR and Investigator's assessment.
|
From date of treatment start until documentation of disease progression or death from any cause (whichever occurred first) or up to data cutoff (Cohort 1; 15 Jan 2012 and Cohort 2; 15 Apr 2013), up to approximately 2 years 8 months
|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)/ Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability of Lenvatinib
Time Frame: From date of treatment start up to 30 days after the last dose, or up to data cutoff (Cohort 1; 15 Jan 2012 and Cohort 2; 15 Apr 2013), up to approximately 2 years 9 months
|
Safety was assessed by monitoring and recording all AEs including all Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grades and SAEs; regular monitoring of hematology, clinical chemistry, and urine values; physical examinations; and regular measurement of vital signs, electrocardiograms (ECGs), and multi-gated acquisition (MUGA) scans or echocardiogram.
|
From date of treatment start up to 30 days after the last dose, or up to data cutoff (Cohort 1; 15 Jan 2012 and Cohort 2; 15 Apr 2013), up to approximately 2 years 9 months
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Concentration of Clinical Biomarkers in Whole Blood
Time Frame: Cycle 1 Day 15 (C1 D15), Cycle 2 Day 1 (C2 D1), Cycle 3 Day 1 (C3 D1), Off-Treatment/Phase Visit 98 (V98)
|
Blood samples were drawn at specific time points.
Utilizing a standard protocol, the deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) from whole blood was extracted and analyzed for specific biomarkers of absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion of lenvatinib.
Some of the biomarkers analyzed included; Angiopoietin, Epidermal Growth Factor (EGF), Fibroblast Growth Factor (FGF), FMS Like Tyrosine Kinase 3 Ligand (Flt3l) Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor (G-CSF), Granulocyte Macro Colony Stimulating Factor (GM-CSF), Interleukin 1 Receptor Antagonist (IL-1RA), Interferon (IFN), Macrophage Inflammatory Protein (MIP) 1 alpha, Platelet Derived Growth Factor (PDGF), Stromal Cell Derived Factor (SDF) 1 alpha, Interleukin (IL), Transforming Growth Factor (TGF), Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF), Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF).
|
Cycle 1 Day 15 (C1 D15), Cycle 2 Day 1 (C2 D1), Cycle 3 Day 1 (C3 D1), Off-Treatment/Phase Visit 98 (V98)
|
|
Summary of Plasma Concentration of Lenvatinib
Time Frame: Predose and 2 to 12 hours postdose at Cycle 1 Day 1 (C1D1), Cycle 1 Day 15 (C1D15), and Cycle 2 Day 1 (C2D1)
|
Blood samples for the quantification of lenvatinib in plasma were obtained and processed using a standardized protocol.
The lower limit of quantification was 0.25 ng/mL.
Pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis was conducted using nonlinear mixed effects modeling.
Descriptive statistics were used to summarize lenvatinib plasma concentration data.
|
Predose and 2 to 12 hours postdose at Cycle 1 Day 1 (C1D1), Cycle 1 Day 15 (C1D15), and Cycle 2 Day 1 (C2D1)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Director: Eisai US Medical Services, Eisai Limited
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
August 1, 2010
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
April 1, 2013
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
November 1, 2014
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
June 2, 2010
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
June 3, 2010
First Posted (ESTIMATE)
June 4, 2010
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
November 13, 2019
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
October 23, 2019
Last Verified
November 1, 2016
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- E7080-G000-206
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.