Real-life Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness of Qvar Versus FP and BDP in the Management of COPD (QvarCOPD)

March 7, 2011 updated by: Research in Real-Life Ltd

Retrospective, Real-life Evaluation of the Effectiveness, Cost-effectiveness and Direct Healthcare Costs of Qvar Pressurised Metered-dose Inhaler (pMDI) Compared With Beclometasone Dipropionate pMDI and Fluticasone pMDI in the Management of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) in a Representative UK Primary Care Patient Population

The objective of this study is to compare the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and direct healthcare costs of managing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in primary care patients with evidence of COPD who either initiate inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) therapy, or have an increase in their ICS dose, as hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) beclometasone dipropionate (BDP) (hereafter Qvar®), CFC-BDP (hereafter BDP) and fluticasone propionate (FP) via pressurised metered-dose inhalers.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Current asthma guidelines in the UK are underpinned by evidence derived from randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Although RCT data are considered the gold standard, patients recruited to asthma RCTs are estimated to represent less than 10% of the UK's asthma population. The poor representation of the asthma population is due to a number of factors, such as tightly-controlled inclusion criteria for RCTs. There is, therefore, a need for more representative RCTs and real-life observational studies to inform existing guidelines and help optimise asthma outcomes.

Short randomised trials have shown that Qvar is at least as effective as FP pMDI and as BDP pMDI at half the prescribed dose in patients with asthma. There is also evidence to suggest that, in adults, HFA formulation as used by Qvar (featuring BDP in solution rather than suspension) may achieve 10-fold higher deposition compared with CFC-BDP.4 Furthermore, deposition in the peripheral regions is higher compared with CFC-BDP and the fine-particle formulation also offers greater tolerance of poor co-ordination of breathing and inhaler actuation, resulting in lower oro-pharyngeal deposition compared with CFC-BDP.

Evidence of the efficacy of ICS monotherapy in COPD remains mixed at this time. While Qvar and ICS monotherapy use in the treatment of COPD is currently off-label, it occurs in clinical practice in two common scenarios:

  1. before a diagnosis of COPD is made
  2. unlicensed use as monotherapy, or in combination with long-acting bronchodilators

The study hypothesis, therefore, is that Qvar treatment in COPD may be associated with improved disease management and control (as assessed by effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and direct healthcare costs of managing COPD) compared with other commonly used ICS therapies, namely BPD and FP, by virtue of its improved deposition throughout the lungs and the small airways.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

815377

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • London, United Kingdom, SW8 5NQ
        • General Practice Research Database

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Primary care COPD patients who at an index prescription date either initiated ICS therapy as extrafine HFA-BDP, CFC-BDP or FP via MDI or had an increase in baseline BDP-equivalent ICS dose the index data as extrafine HFA-BDP, CFC-BDP or FP via MDI

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged ≥40 years at index prescription date
  • COPD diagnosis:

    • diagnostic code, and
    • ≥2 prescriptions for COPD therapy in baseline year (at different points in time)

      • For the ICS increase cohort (i.e. IPDA) ≥1 of these prescriptions must be for ICS therapy.
      • Commence ICS therapy at any time (even if before COPD diagnosis is made)

Exclusion Criteria:

- A diagnostic read code for any other chronic respiratory disease (except asthma)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Retrospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
IPDA FP MDI
Patients who were on inhaled corticosteroid therapy as part of their baseline therapy (any ICS therapy) who, at an index prescription date, stepped-up ICS dose as fluticasone via metered dose inhaler
Step-up in baseline BDP-equivalent ICS dose
Initiation of ICS therapy
IPDA HFA-BDP MDI
Patients who were on inhaled corticosteroid therapy as part of their baseline therapy (any ICS therapy) who, at an index prescription date, stepped-up ICS dose as extra-fine hydrofluoroalkane beclomethasone dipropionate via metered dose inhaler
Step-up in baseline BDP-equivalent ICS dose
Other Names:
  • Qvar®
IPDA CFC-BDP MDI
Patients who were on inhaled corticosteroid therapy as part of their baseline therapy (any ICS therapy) who, at an index prescription date, stepped-up ICS dose as chlorofluorocarbon beclomethasone dipropionate via metered dose inhaler
Step-up in baseline BDP-equivalent ICS dose
IPDI CFC-BDP MDI
Patients who were not receiving inhaled corticosteroid therapy as part of their baseline therapy but who, at an index prescription date, initiated ICS as chlorofluorocarbon beclomethasone dipropionate via metered dose inhaler
Initiation of ICS therapy
IPDI HFA-BDP MDI
Patients who were not receiving inhaled corticosteroid therapy as part of their baseline therapy but who, at an index prescription date, initiated ICS as hydrofluoroalkane beclomethasone dipropionate via metered dose inhaler
Initiation of ICS therapy
Other Names:
  • Qvar®
IPDI FP MDI
Patients who were not receiving inhaled corticosteroid therapy as part of their baseline therapy but who, at an index prescription date, initiated ICS as fluticasone propionate via metered dose inhaler
Step-up in baseline BDP-equivalent ICS dose
Initiation of ICS therapy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total number of exacerbations; exacerbation rate ratio; time to first after IPD
Time Frame: Two-year outcome period

Where exacerbations are defined as:

  • Unscheduled hospital admissions / A&E attendances:*

    • For COPD (definite code) and
    • Lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI) treated with antibiotics
  • Acute use of oral steroids
  • Antibiotics use with a lower respiratory read code within a ±5-day window
Two-year outcome period
COPD treatment success
Time Frame: Two-year outcome period
  • No recorded hospital attendance for COPD or respiratory related events (i.e. with a lower respiratory read code), including:

    • Admission
    • A&E attendance
    • Out of hours attendance
  • No exacerbations of COPD ("definite" plus "possible" prescriptions as defined above)
  • No consultations, hospital admissions or A&E attendance for lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI) requiring antibiotics.
Two-year outcome period

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
COPD treatment success factoring in change in therapy
Time Frame: Two-year outcome period

Defined as absence of:

  • Exacerbations; and/or
  • Increase in dose of inhaled steroid; and/or
  • Change in delivery device, and/or
  • Change in ICS
  • Use of additional therapy not received in baseline year, split by:

    • LABA
    • Theophylline
    • LTRAs.
Two-year outcome period
COPD treatment success factoring in change in therapy unrelated to cost savings
Time Frame: Two-year outcome period

Defined as absence of:

  • Exacerbations; and/or
  • Increase in dose of inhaled steroid; and/or
  • Use of additional therapy not received in baseline year, split by:

    • LABA
    • Theophylline
    • LTRAs.
Two-year outcome period
Change in ICS dosing
Time Frame: Two-year outcome period

Proportion of patients who:

  • Remained on the same ICS (and/or combination therapy) throughout the outcome period
  • Remained on the same ICS dose throughout the outcome period, but had another therapy added
  • Received an ICS dose increase and / or therapy added to their ICS during the outcome period.
Two-year outcome period
Rate of hospitalisations
Time Frame: Two-year outcomes

Where hospitalisations are defined as

  • Admissions and A&E coded as:

    • lower respiratory-related, or
    • for COPD
  • Admissions and A&E coded as:

    • lower respiratory-related, or
    • for COPD
    • admission attendance occurring within a ±7 day window of an LRTI treated with antibiotics.
Two-year outcomes
SABA usage
Time Frame: Two-year outcome
Average SABA daily dose, categorised as: 0mcg, >0-100mcg, >100-200mcg, >200-400mcg, >400-800mcg, >800mcg.
Two-year outcome
Mortality
Time Frame: Two-years
  • Respiratory mortality
  • All-cause mortality
Two-years
Incidence of pneumonia
Time Frame: Two-year outcome
  • Unconfirmed (i.e. all unique patients with codes for pneumonia) AND
  • Confirmed:

    • chest X-ray within a month of a pneumonia diagnosis, or
    • hospitalisation within a month of a pneumonia diagnosis
Two-year outcome
Incremental cost effectiveness ratio
Time Frame: Two-year outcome
Difference in costs (HFA-BDP the comparator) over difference in effectiveness (using primary outcome of exacerbations)
Two-year outcome
Cost of total healthcare treatment
Time Frame: Two-year outcome

Costs for each intervention:

  • including ICS costs
  • excluding ICS costs
Two-year outcome
Costs for COPD treatment
Time Frame: Two-year outcome

Costs of COPD treatment:

  • including ICS costs
  • excluding ICS costs
Two-year outcome

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2001

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2007

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2007

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 9, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 9, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

June 10, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 8, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 7, 2011

Last Verified

March 1, 2011

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Clinical Trials on Fluticasone propionate metred dose inhaler

3
Subscribe