Real-Time Telehealth to Promote Self-care Management for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (E-Breathe)

July 12, 2010 updated by: Breathe California, Los Angeles County

A Randomized Controlled Trial Using Real-Time Interactive Audio/Visual Telehealth to Promote Self-care Management for United States Veterans With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: a Pilot Study

HYPOTHESIS:The study purpose is to evaluate the effectiveness of a structured pursed-lips breathing (PLB) protocol taught via real-time interactive telecommunication with a home computer using the lnternet and Skype software in veterans with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD. The primary hypothesis is veterans with COPD and dyspnea on exertion who receive a PLB educational intervention taught via weekly interactive telecommunication over a 4-week period will have greater reduction of exertional dyspnea compared to those who receive the PLB educational intervention with no weekly interactive sessions.

RESEARCH PLAN: An experimental two- group design is used. All subjects receive a brief 5 - 10 minute one-on-one PLB educational session. Subjects are then randomized to either the intervention group or the control group. The intervention group receives 4 weekly interactive group sessions with the health educator (principal investigator)via computer. A free software program known as Skype allows synchronous video and audio interaction. The comparison group receives only the brief PLB educational session with no weekly follow-up.

RESULTS: At end of 4 weeks, the intervention group had significantly lower dyspnea intensity scores (group X time interaction F = 6.69, p = 0.02) and significantly higher social support scores (group x time interaction F = 4.34, p = 0.058).

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Skype is a viable means for providing patient education. A structured PLB protocol provides significant differences in exertional dyspnea over time. A structured PLB protocol plus Skype showed significant reduction in patients' sense of dyspnea intensity and increased social support scores.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

22

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

45 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Clinical diagnosis of COPD, expiratory airflow limitation evidenced by forced expiratory volume 1 second/forced vital capacity percent (FEV1/FVC %) less than 70 and FEV1 % predicted less than 80 with no reversibility by inhaled bronchodilator, and self report of shortness of breath when walking as assessed with the modified Medical Research Council (MRC) chronic dyspnea questionnaire.

-

Exclusion Criteria:

Exacerbation of symptoms (dyspnea, increased sputum volume, and/or increased sputum purulence) within the past four weeks, hospital admission within the past four weeks, change in bronchodilator therapy within the past two weeks, unable to walk, unstable angina, unstable cardiac dysrhythmia, unstable congestive heart failure, and/or unstable neurosis or psychiatric disturbance.

-

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Dyspnea Intensity
Time Frame: End of 4 weeks and end of 12 weeks
Dyspnea Intensity is measured with the Visual Analogue Scale. The scale is a 100-cm horizontal line with verbal anchors at either end. Interval level data are obtained by measuring from left to the point marked by the subject. The subjects mark the scale with a pencil in response to the question, "During the last 24 hours, how easy or how hard was it to get your breath?"
End of 4 weeks and end of 12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Breathe California, Los Angeles County

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Margaret A Nield, PhD, Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 12, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 12, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

July 13, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

July 13, 2010

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 12, 2010

Last Verified

July 1, 2010

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Nield005
  • BBRI 900.1553 (Other Grant/Funding Number: Breathe California, Los Angeles County)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe