Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety in Control Cough and the Relief of Nasal Symptoms in Children 2-12 Years Old,Suffering From Cough and Acute Rhinitis

October 18, 2016 updated by: Ache Laboratorios Farmaceuticos S.A.

Multicenter Clinical Trial, Phase III, Controlled, Open, Parallel Group, Randomized, Comparing the Fixed Dose Combination of Diphenhydramine + Dropropizine + Pseudoephedrine and the Combined Use of Dropropizine and Fixed Dose Combination of Pseudoephedrine Hydrochloride + Brompheniramine Maleate Used Orally for Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety in Control Cough and the Relief of Nasal Symptoms in Children 2 to 12 Years Old, Suffering From Non-productive Cough and Acute Rhinitis.

Multicenter clinical trial, phase III, controlled by active medicine, open, randomized, enroll 962 children, 2 to 12 years old, that suffer acute inflammation upper airway characterized by non-productive cough, daytime/nighttime, with duration for at least 3 and no more than 5 consecutive days (without systemic/topic use of medication during this period) followed by nasal congestion, with or without associate other nasal symptoms (sneezing, runny nose, nasal itching and/or mouth breathing). The subjects will be allocated in 2 parallel groups, and will receive the medicines of study, according of the randomization.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Phase 3

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

2 years to 12 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients between 2 and 12 years old, of both sexes;
  2. Clinical condition compatible with acute rhinitis accompanied by nasal obstruction;
  3. Non-productive cough, daytime and/or nighttime with at least 3 and up 5 consecutive days in duration;
  4. Score greater than or equal to 3 points on the cough severity score (As per item 4.1.2);
  5. Score greater than or equal to 2 points on the nasal obstruction severity score (As per item 4.1.3);
  6. ICF signed by a parent/caregiver/representant;
  7. Parent/Caregiver/Representant capacity, according to investigator evaluation, for compliance at the treatment and protocol requirements, fulfilling the regular visits;

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Non-productive cough with purulent smear, fever (axillar temperature superior than 37,8°C/100°F), purulent runny nose and other signs and symptoms of bacteria infection of upper and lower airways at 7 days before the screening/randomization visit;
  2. Septal deviation level III (in any region and any nasal cavity) and/or nasal polyps or other determinants conditions of nasal congestion;
  3. Previous diagnosis of asthma;
  4. Patients under treatment for chronic allergy;
  5. Presence of purulent or mucopurulent secretion, nasal vault or mal formations (cleft lip or cleft nasolabial corrected or not) in nasal vestibule;
  6. Current use of systemic antibiotics for any reason;
  7. Use of prohibited medicine within the prescribed period before V0 as shown in item 9.3 of this protocol;
  8. Participation in last one year of clinical protocols;
  9. Any psychiatric diseases, including major depression;
  10. Presence of mental retardation from any cause;
  11. Diagnosis of renal or hepatic failure;
  12. History of hypersensitivity to any component of the study drugs;
  13. Relatives of sponsor´s or study site´s employee;
  14. Current evidence of clinically significant diseases: hematopoietic, gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, hepatic, renal, neurological, endocrine, psychiatric, autoimmune, pulmonary, or another disease that block the patient participation;
  15. Patient or parent/caregiver/representant with a history of lack of compliance to treatment or previous treatment protocols;
  16. Any finding of clinical observation (anamnesis and physical exam) laboratory abnormality (eg, blood glucose, blood count), disease (for example, liver, cardiovascular system, lung) or therapy that, in opinion of the investigator, may endanger the patient or interfere with the endpoints of study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Notuss® syrup
Group 1: fixed dose combination of diphenhydramine + dropropizine + pseudoephedrine (Notuss® syrup).

Group 1: fixed dose combination of diphenhydramine + dropropizine + pseudoephedrine (Notuss® syrup).

Posology: The medicine treat will be as follows:

- Notuss® syrup Age: 2-5 years / Dosage: 5,0 mL Age: 6-12 years / Dosage: 10,0 ml

Active Comparator: Dropropizine + Pseudoephedrine and brompheniramine
Group 2: combined use of dropropizine and fixed dose combination of pseudoephedrine hydrochloride + brompheniramine maleate.

Dropropizine:

Age: 2 - 3 years / Dosage: 5,0 ml Age: 4 - 12 years / Dosage: 10,0 ml

Pseudoephedrine hydrochloride + brompheniramine maleate:

Age: 2 - 3 years / Dosage: 2,5 ml Age: 4 - 6 years / Dosage: 5,0 ml Age: 7 - 9 years / Dosage: 7,5 ml Age: 10 - 12 years / Dosage: 10,0 ml

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Improvement of nasal congestion and cough
Time Frame: Evaluated on the day 2 after beginning treatment
Participants were evaluated (by a parent/guardian/caregivers) for pain intensity by using a 4-point rating scale: 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, and 3=severe.
Evaluated on the day 2 after beginning treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Improvement of nasal congestion and cough
Time Frame: Evaluated on the 7(±1) day after beginning treatment
Participants were evaluated (by a parent/guardian/caregivers) for pain intensity by using a 4-point rating scale: 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, and 3=severe.
Evaluated on the 7(±1) day after beginning treatment
Improvement of non-obstructive nasal symptoms
Time Frame: Evaluated on the day 2 and 7 (±1) after beginning treatment
Participants were evaluated (by a parent/guardian/caregivers for pain intensity by using a sum of 4-point rating scale: 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, and 3=severe.
Evaluated on the day 2 and 7 (±1) after beginning treatment
Reduction of the frequency of nighttime awakenings of parent/guardian/roommate of the child
Time Frame: Evaluated on the day 2 and 7 (±1) after beginning treatment
Evaluated on the day 2 and 7 (±1) after beginning treatment
Reduction of vomiting frequency episodes triggered by coughing
Time Frame: Evaluated on the day 2 and 7 (±1) after beginning treatment
Evaluated on the day 2 and 7 (±1) after beginning treatment
Improvement of acute rhinitis signs
Time Frame: Evaluated on the day 2 and 7 (±1) after beginning treatment
Assessed by anterior rhinoscopy and application of specific clinical scores
Evaluated on the day 2 and 7 (±1) after beginning treatment
Use of rescue medication
Time Frame: Evaluated on the day 2 and 7 (±1) after beginning treatment
Evaluated on the day 2 and 7 (±1) after beginning treatment
Overall impression of improvement by the investigator
Time Frame: Evaluated on the day 2 and 7 (±1) after beginning treatment
Specific scale and overall impression of improvement by a parent/guardian/ caregiver of the child
Evaluated on the day 2 and 7 (±1) after beginning treatment
Safety descriptive about occurence of adverse events, evaluation of results of general physical examination.
Time Frame: Will be evaluated during the 7(± 1) days of treatment
Collection of safety data throughout the whole study period
Will be evaluated during the 7(± 1) days of treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

April 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 6, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 6, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

August 9, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

October 19, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 18, 2016

Last Verified

October 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Inflammation

Clinical Trials on diphenhydramine + dropropizine + pseudoephedrine

3
Subscribe