Bipolar H.A Versus Trochanteric Antegrade Nail for Treatment of Displaced Subcapital Femoral Fractures

March 16, 2012 updated by: Meir Medical Center
A retrospective study to compare clinical results of patients that were treated by Bipolar H.A. vs. closed reduction and internal fixation with Trochanteric Antegrade Nail for displaced femoral subcapital fracture.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

200

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Kfar - Saba, Israel
        • Recruiting
        • Meir Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

200 patients sustained a displaced subcapital femoral fracture and were operated on by colsed reduction and internal fixation with T.A.N nail or Bipolar hemiarthroplasty

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Displaced femoral subcapital fracture.
  • Active patient.
  • Age 40-85.
  • Patient was treated by one of the two methods.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age out of range.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
100 patients, displaced subcapital fracture, T.A.N nail.
100 patients sustained a displaced femoral subcapital fracture, that were operated on with closed reduction and internal fixation with TAN nail.
100 patients, displaced subcapital fracture, Bipolar H.A..

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
describe treatment of patients that were treated by Bipolar H.A. vs. closed reduction and internal fixation
Time Frame: 6month to 3 years following operation
A retrospective study will defer between groups
6month to 3 years following operation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

April 1, 2012

Study Completion (Anticipated)

April 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 2, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 12, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

August 13, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 19, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 16, 2012

Last Verified

March 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Displaced Subcapital Femoral Fracture

3
Subscribe