Sierra High Definition Ano-Rectal Manometry

July 20, 2018 updated by: Satish Rao, Augusta University

Hypotheses: High definition manometry (HDM) is safe and feasible in humans; HDM accurately characterizes anorectal anatomy and function in healthy humans; HDM provides comparable information regarding the structure and function of the anorectal region, to that obtained from ano-rectal manometry and anal ultrasonography (AUS), in patients with fecal incontinence or constipation.

Methods: 20 healthy volunteers, 20 patients with fecal incontinence, 20 patients with constipation will be recruited. Because anorectal disorders are more common in women, the investigators will recruit approximately 8 men and 12 women in each group. Each subject will undergo anorectal manometry, anal ultrasound and high definition manometry.

Data Analysis: Spearman correlational analysis will be performed to compare the parameters listed above. Also, the diagnostic yield of anal ultrasonography vs HDM in identifying anatomic sphincter defects will be assessed.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

80

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Iowa
      • Iowa City, Iowa, United States, 52242
        • University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

We will recruit 20 healthy volunteers, 20 patients with fecal incontinence, 20 patients with constipation. Because anorectal disorders are more common in women, we will recruit approximately 8 men and 12 women in each group. Because it is possible subjects may sign consent but not participate in the study, or drop out of the study before completion, we will recruit a total of 80 subjects.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

For patients:

  1. Either fecal incontinence (the occurrence of at least one episode of involuntary discharge of stool matter per week) or constipation (Rome III criteria) (16,17)
  2. Adults between the ages of 18-80 yrs.

For healthy volunteers:

  1. Adults between the ages of 18-80 yrs
  2. No gastrointestinal symptoms

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Rectal prolapse or anal fissure on physical examination
  2. Recent pelvic or recto-anal surgery (< 6 months ago)
  3. History of pelvic irradiation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
healthy volunteers
patients with fecal incontinence
patients with constipation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
To assess the feasibility of HDM in three groups of human subjects; healthy humans, patients with fecal incontinence and patients with chronic constipation
Time Frame: One visit
One visit

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Satish SC Rao, MD, Phd, University of Iowa

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 19, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 18, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

February 23, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 23, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 20, 2018

Last Verified

July 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe