The Analgesic Effect of Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block Following Radical Prostatectomy

June 19, 2012 updated by: Birgitte Ruhnau, Rigshospitalet, Denmark

The Analgesic Effect of Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block Versus Wound Infiltration Versus Placebo Following Open Radical Prostatectomy, a Double Blinded, Randomized Clinical Trial

This study is conducted to evaluate different analgesic treatments effect following operation where the prostate gland is surgically removed.

The different treatments the investigators wish to investigate is:

  1. Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) block.

    The TAP block is a rather new method, where a local anaesthetic is deposited between the two inner abdominal muscles. Between these muscles, the nerves that innervates the anterior part of the abdominal wall is situated.

  2. Wound infiltration

    In this method you deposit a local anaesthetic in the edges of the wound.

  3. Placebo

No active local treatment is given.

All patients who wish to participate will be allocated to one of three different treatment groups.

Group 1:

Will receive TAP block with a local anaesthetic and wound infiltration with saline.

Group 2:

Will receive wound infiltration with a local anaesthetic and TAP block with saline.

Group 3:

Will receive TAP block with saline and wound infiltration with saline.

Beside this local treatment all patients will be given systemic Paracetamol (tablet) and Ibuprofen (tablet).

In addition all patients will be given a pump containing morphine. The pump is connected to a button which the patient can activate when they experience pain. This enables the patient to control how much morphine he needs, following the operation.

The hypothesis is that the TAP block is superior in reducing pain and thereby reducing morphine consumption compared to wound infiltration and placebo.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

75

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Copenhagen Ø, Denmark, 2100
        • The Department of Anaesthesiology, Abdominal Centre, Rigshospitalet

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • BMI > 18 and < 35
  • Patients who have given their informed consent and have fully understood the nature and limitations of the study
  • Patient who is planned for radical prostatectomy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not able to cooperate to complete the study
  • Is not able to speak and understand danish
  • Allergy towards the drugs which is used in the study
  • Daily use of strong opioids
  • Infection at the injection area

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: QUADRUPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: TAP block

TAP block with Ropivacaine

Wound infiltration with Saline

20 mL of 0,75% Naropin is deposited on each side (40 mL in total) in the TAP.

At the same time 40 mL of saline 0,9% will be deposited subcutaneously as wound infiltration.

Both procedures is carried out at the end of the surgery while the patient is still anaesthetized and only this once.

Other Names:
  • Placebo
  • Ropivacaine
  • TAP block
  • Wound infiltration

20 mL Saline 0,9% is deposited on each side (40 mL in total) in the TAP.

At the same time 40 mL Ropivacaine 0,75% will be deposited subcutaneously as wound infiltration.

Both procedures is carried out at the end of the surgery while the patient is still anaesthetized and only this once.

Other Names:
  • Placebo
  • Ropivacaine
  • TAP block
  • Wound infiltration
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Wound infiltration

TAP block with Saline.

Wound infiltration with Ropivacaine.

20 mL of 0,75% Naropin is deposited on each side (40 mL in total) in the TAP.

At the same time 40 mL of saline 0,9% will be deposited subcutaneously as wound infiltration.

Both procedures is carried out at the end of the surgery while the patient is still anaesthetized and only this once.

Other Names:
  • Placebo
  • Ropivacaine
  • TAP block
  • Wound infiltration

20 mL Saline 0,9% is deposited on each side (40 mL in total) in the TAP.

At the same time 40 mL Ropivacaine 0,75% will be deposited subcutaneously as wound infiltration.

Both procedures is carried out at the end of the surgery while the patient is still anaesthetized and only this once.

Other Names:
  • Placebo
  • Ropivacaine
  • TAP block
  • Wound infiltration
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Placebo

TAP block with Saline.

Wound infiltration with Saline.

20 mL 0,9% Saline is deposited on each side (40 mL in total) in the TAP.

At the same time 40 mL Saline 0,9% will be given as wound infiltration.

Both procedures is carried out at the end of the surgery while the patient is still anaesthetized and only this once.

Other Names:
  • Ropivacaine
  • TAP block
  • Wound infiltration

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
A mean visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score 4 hours after surgery when moving from a supine to sitting position between the group receiving active TAP block and the placebo group.
Time Frame: 4 hours postoperative
4 hours postoperative

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
VAS pain score at rest, recorded as a Area Under Curve (AUC/24h)
Time Frame: Recorded 0-24 hours postoperative

This outcome is assessed 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 20 and 24 hours postoperative, while the patient is supine in his bed.

This outcome is recorded in and compared between all three groups.

Recorded 0-24 hours postoperative
VAS pain score when moving from a supine to a sitting position, recorded as a Area under Curve (AUC/24h)
Time Frame: Recorded 0-24 hours postoperative
This outcome is assessed 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 20 and 24 hours postoperative. This outcome is recorded in and compared between all three groups.
Recorded 0-24 hours postoperative
Nausea
Time Frame: Recorded 0-24 hours postoperative

On a scale ranging none-mild-moderate-severe at 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 20, 24 hours postoperative.

This outcome is recorded in and compared between all three groups

Recorded 0-24 hours postoperative
Sedation
Time Frame: Recorded at 0-24 hours postoperative

On a scale ranging none-mild-moderate-severe this outcome is assessed at 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 20 and 24 hours postoperative.

This outcome is recorded in and compared between all three groups.

Recorded at 0-24 hours postoperative
Vomiting
Time Frame: Recorded 0-24 hours postoperative
The number of times the patient produces more than 10 mL of vomit. Recorded at the intervals 0-1, 1-2, 2-4, 4-6, 6-8, 8-20 and 20-24 hours postoperative This outcome is recorded in and compared between all three groups
Recorded 0-24 hours postoperative
On-going morphine consumption
Time Frame: Recorded 0-24 postoperative
Recorded at the intervals 0-1, 1-2, 2-4, 4-6, 6-8, 8-20 and 20-24 hours postoperative This outcome is recorded and compared between all three groups
Recorded 0-24 postoperative
Cumulated morphine consumption
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperative
This outcome is recorded in and compared between all three groups.
24 hours postoperative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Birgitte Ruhnau, Consultant, Department of Anaesthesiology, Abdominal Centre, Rigshospitalet

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2011

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

February 1, 2012

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

February 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 11, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 16, 2011

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

March 17, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

June 20, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 19, 2012

Last Verified

June 1, 2012

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Postoperative Pain

Clinical Trials on Naropine

3
Subscribe