Adductor Canal Block: Continuous Infusion Versus Automatic Intermittent Bolus

August 11, 2017 updated by: Gianluca Cappelleri, ASST Gaetano Pini-CTO

Adductor Canal Block: Continuous Infusion Versus Automatic Intermittent Bolus For Postoperative Analgesia After Day-Case Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

The aim of this prospective, randomized , blinded study is to compare two different infusion techniques (continuous VS intermittent automatic bolus) to assess the effects of postoperative analgesia after Day-Case anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Milan, Italy
        • Istituto Ortopedico Gaetano Pini

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age above 18 years old
  • American society of anesthesiology (ASA) physical status I-II
  • Signed informed consensus

Exclusion Criteria:

  • ASA >II
  • Unstable neurological disease
  • Diabetic mellitus (DM) type I-II
  • Allergy to used drugs
  • Opioid chronic treatment
  • Consensus refusal or not valid
  • Anticoagulant therapy
  • Postoperative intensive care required

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Continuous Infusion
Patients receive a postoperative continuous infusion of Ropivacaine 0,2% at 6 ml/h and 4 ml PCA bolus, lockout 20 minutes via electronic infusion pump (Micrel device, Greece).
Postoperative continuous infusion of Ropivacaine 0,2% at 6 ml/h and 4 ml PCA bolus, lockout 20 minutes via electronic infusion pump (Micrel device, Greece).
Other Names:
  • naropine 0.2%
Experimental: Automatic Intermittent Bolus
Patients receive a postoperative Automatic Intermittent Bolus of 6 ml Ropivacaine 0,2% and 4 ml PCA bolus, lockout 20 minutes every hour via electronic infusion pump (Micrel device, Greece).
Postoperative Automatic Intermittent Bolus of 6 ml Ropivacaine 0,2% every hour and 4 ml PCA bolus, lockout 20 minutes via electronic infusion pump (Micrel device, Greece).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
NRS Score
Time Frame: 72h postoperative
Evaluation of numeric rating score (NRS) in patient with automatic intermittent bolus of Ropivacaine 0,2% instead of classic continuous perfusion
72h postoperative

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Up and Go test
Time Frame: 72h postoperative
"up and go" test: time need to get up from a chair, walk for 3 meters, and come back to seat down on the chair
72h postoperative
Opioids request
Time Frame: 72h postoperative
Opioids consumption will be recorded throughout 72 postoperative hours
72h postoperative
Local anesthetic consumption
Time Frame: 72h postoperative
Evaluation of local anesthesia consumption every 6h in first 72 postoperative hours.
72h postoperative
10mt walk test
Time Frame: 72h postoperative
time need to walk 10 meters
72h postoperative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Gianluca Cappelleri, MD, Study Principal Investigator

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 27, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 27, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

October 28, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 14, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 11, 2017

Last Verified

August 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Injury of Anterior Cruciate Ligament

Clinical Trials on Continuous Infusion of ropivacaine 0.2%

Subscribe