- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02589288
Adductor Canal Block: Continuous Infusion Versus Automatic Intermittent Bolus
August 11, 2017 updated by: Gianluca Cappelleri, ASST Gaetano Pini-CTO
Adductor Canal Block: Continuous Infusion Versus Automatic Intermittent Bolus For Postoperative Analgesia After Day-Case Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
The aim of this prospective, randomized , blinded study is to compare two different infusion techniques (continuous VS intermittent automatic bolus) to assess the effects of postoperative analgesia after Day-Case anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
80
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Milan, Italy
- Istituto Ortopedico Gaetano Pini
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age above 18 years old
- American society of anesthesiology (ASA) physical status I-II
- Signed informed consensus
Exclusion Criteria:
- ASA >II
- Unstable neurological disease
- Diabetic mellitus (DM) type I-II
- Allergy to used drugs
- Opioid chronic treatment
- Consensus refusal or not valid
- Anticoagulant therapy
- Postoperative intensive care required
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Continuous Infusion
Patients receive a postoperative continuous infusion of Ropivacaine 0,2% at 6 ml/h and 4 ml PCA bolus, lockout 20 minutes via electronic infusion pump (Micrel device, Greece).
|
Postoperative continuous infusion of Ropivacaine 0,2% at 6 ml/h and 4 ml PCA bolus, lockout 20 minutes via electronic infusion pump (Micrel device, Greece).
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: Automatic Intermittent Bolus
Patients receive a postoperative Automatic Intermittent Bolus of 6 ml Ropivacaine 0,2% and 4 ml PCA bolus, lockout 20 minutes every hour via electronic infusion pump (Micrel device, Greece).
|
Postoperative Automatic Intermittent Bolus of 6 ml Ropivacaine 0,2% every hour and 4 ml PCA bolus, lockout 20 minutes via electronic infusion pump (Micrel device, Greece).
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
NRS Score
Time Frame: 72h postoperative
|
Evaluation of numeric rating score (NRS) in patient with automatic intermittent bolus of Ropivacaine 0,2% instead of classic continuous perfusion
|
72h postoperative
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Up and Go test
Time Frame: 72h postoperative
|
"up and go" test: time need to get up from a chair, walk for 3 meters, and come back to seat down on the chair
|
72h postoperative
|
|
Opioids request
Time Frame: 72h postoperative
|
Opioids consumption will be recorded throughout 72 postoperative hours
|
72h postoperative
|
|
Local anesthetic consumption
Time Frame: 72h postoperative
|
Evaluation of local anesthesia consumption every 6h in first 72 postoperative hours.
|
72h postoperative
|
|
10mt walk test
Time Frame: 72h postoperative
|
time need to walk 10 meters
|
72h postoperative
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Gianluca Cappelleri, MD, Study Principal Investigator
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
November 1, 2015
Primary Completion (Actual)
December 1, 2016
Study Completion (Actual)
March 1, 2017
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
October 27, 2015
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
October 27, 2015
First Posted (Estimate)
October 28, 2015
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
August 14, 2017
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
August 11, 2017
Last Verified
August 1, 2017
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- IOGPGC09
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Injury of Anterior Cruciate Ligament
-
University of California, San FranciscoArthritis FoundationCompletedAcute Injury of Anterior Cruciate LigamentUnited States
-
Lynn Snyder-MacklerCompletedAcute Injury of Anterior Cruciate LigamentUnited States
-
Universidad de GranadaCompletedAcute Injury of Anterior Cruciate LigamentSpain
-
Bergen Knee GroupCompletedInjury of Anterior Cruciate Ligament | Deficiency of Anterior Cruciate LigamentNorway
-
University of CalgaryWorkers' Compensation Board, AlbertaCompletedAnterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury | Chronic Instability of Knee | Deficiency of Anterior Cruciate LigamentCanada
-
Emory UniversityNational Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS)CompletedInjury of Anterior Cruciate LigamentUnited States
-
University of ManitobaCompletedInjury of Anterior Cruciate LigamentCanada
-
The Hawkins FoundationCompleted
-
Alexander Rofner-MorettiRecruitingAnterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction | Anterior Cruciate Ligament InjuryAustria
-
eMKa MED Medical CenterWroclaw Medical UniversityRecruitingAnterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear | Knee Injuries | Knee Ligament InjuryPoland
Clinical Trials on Continuous Infusion of ropivacaine 0.2%
-
University Health Network, TorontoUnknownPIB Versus CI Through a Popliteal Sciatic Nerve Catheter for Analgesia Following Major Ankle SurgeryPain, PostoperativeCanada
-
University of California, San DiegoEnrolling by invitationTrauma Injury | Pain, Acute PostoperativeUnited States
-
J P LecoqCompletedPostoperative Complications | Postoperative PainBelgium
-
University of British ColumbiaRecruitingAcute Pain | Cardiac Surgery | SternotomyCanada
-
University of California, San DiegoRecruitingAnesthesia, Local | Acute Pain | Anesthesia | Hepatic ResectionUnited States
-
Poznan University of Medical SciencesRecruitingHip Dysplasia | Hip Disease | Hip ArthropathyPoland
-
Ciusss de L'Est de l'Île de MontréalTerminatedPostoperative PainCanada
-
Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyRecruiting
-
Nordsjaellands HospitalTerminatedPain, Postoperative | Anaesthesia | Other Acute Postoperative PainDenmark
-
Institut Kassab d'OrthopédieUnknownPain Management | Neuromuscular Blockade