High Definition White Light Endoscopy and Narrow Band Imaging for the Assessment of Barrett's Disease After Endoscopic Therapy

April 8, 2014 updated by: Herbert C. Wolfsen, Mayo Clinic
The investigators seek to test the hypothesis that the improved version of high definition white light endoscopes and Narrow Band Imaging (NBI) are more accurate in detecting residual Barrett's Metaplasia and Dysplasia disease after previous resection or ablation treatments than current versions of these endoscopes.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Detailed Description

Information will be collected. Images will be taken.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

21

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Florida
      • Jacksonville, Florida, United States, 32224
        • Mayo Clinic

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 88 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Men and women (not pregnant) presenting to the GI Lab for Upper Endoscopy. Child-bearing potential not excluded.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18 years and older
  • Patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE) dysplasia as the original indication for treatment
  • Undergoing any type of endoscopic BE resection or ablation treatment including RFA, cryotherapy, photodynamic therapy, or EMR, or combinations of these.
  • <1cm of circumferential, peninsular, or island-type BE on prior endoscopy or ablation
  • Ability to provide written, informed consent

Deferral Criteria: This category is for patients in two specific situations, 1) Erosive esophagitis, and, 2) presence of a nodule suspicious for the presence of neoplasia.

  1. Erosive esophagitis: patients found to have erosive esophagitis, will be deferred for up to 3 months from their Index study procedure, to permit more aggressive medical therapy to heal the erosive esophagitis. After healing, the Index study procedure will be performed up to 3 months later, and the follow-up endoscopy (and study closure) performed 3 to 6 months after that (total of no more than 9 months).
  2. Presence of nodule suspicious for neoplasia: for patients found to have such nodular lesions, the Index study procedure will be deferred for 3 months, while Endoscopic Mucosal Resection is performed and subsequently heals.

Note: Only one deferral per patient is permitted, and this one deferral is allowed only for these specific criteria. The end of the study will be defined by the time of follow-up of the last patient who was not deferred; any deferred patients who have not completed follow-up procedures by that time, may miss their follow-up visit as part of the study. (This is to prevent the possibility of delaying the close of the study due to deferral of a procedure late in the study.)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current participation in another clinical study
  • Complete eradication of BE documented by biopsies in 3 or more previous endoscopic procedures performed after resection/ablation
  • Inability to obtain biopsies due to anticoagulation, varices, etc.
  • Pregnancy
  • Worse than Grade C erosive esophagitis
  • Less than 3 weeks from previous endoscopy with biopsy or 6 weeks from previous endoscopic therapy (ablation or resection).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Accuracy of Agreement Between Imaging and Histology
Time Frame: 9 months
The accuracy of agreement between endoscopic imaging diagnosis compared with biopsy histology diagnosis.
9 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Presence of Residual Disease
Time Frame: 9 months
Presence of any residual Barrett's disease at follow-up endoscopy after ablation / resection treatment.
9 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Herbert C. Wolfsen,, M.D., Mayo Clinic

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 18, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 25, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

May 26, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 10, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 8, 2014

Last Verified

April 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Barrett's Esophagus

3
Subscribe