Interventional Strategies in Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation: Percutaneous Closure of the Left Atrial Appendage Versus Catheter Ablation (ISAR-AF)

April 10, 2017 updated by: Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia, associated with an increased risk of morbidity and mortality1. The management of AF patients is aimed at reducing symptoms and at preventing severe complications associated with AF. In the last years, two new strategies have emerged with different objectives. In the PROTECT AF study2, percutaneous closure of the Left Atrial Appendage (LAA) with a closure device provided an alternative strategy to oral anticoagulation for stroke prophylaxis. The AFFIRM trial3 has shown that drug-based management of AF with a rhythm-control strategy conferred no advantage over a rate-control strategy in cardiovascular mortality and might be associated with an increased noncardiovascular death rate4. Catheter ablation has gained a greater place in the rhythm control strategy, showing superiority in maintaining sinus rhythm in comparison with AAD5. However, in persistent AF, repeat ablation procedures are necessary in up to 70% of patients to achieve sinus rhythm at a long-term follow-up6-7.

This prospective, randomized trial will compare the percutaneous closure of the LAA combined with a rate-control strategy to catheter ablation in the management of patients with persistent AF. Patients who are eligible for catheter ablation as well as LAA closure device implantation and are willing to participate in the study will be randomly assigned to catheter ablation or percutaneous closure of the LAA by a closure device implantation in the relation 1:1. The primary endpoint of the study is a composite endpoint at 12 months of all cause death, thrombo-embolic events, major bleeding (BARC type 3), re-hospitalisation and severe symptoms due to arrhythmias. Secondary endpoints include a composite endpoint of bleeding, a composite endpoint of thrombo-embolic events, cardio-vascular mortality, total duration of hospitalisation, sustained discontinued anticoagulation, quality of life improvement, use of Antiarrhythmic Drugs (AAD), total costs, freedom from arrhythmia and average ventricular frequency in 7-day holter ECG at 12 months.

The objective of the study is to assess the superiority of percutaneous closure of the LAA combined with rate-control to catheter ablation in patients with oligosymptomatic AF.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

120

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Munich, Germany, 80636
        • Deutsches Herzzentrum München

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with oligosymptomatic AF eligible for both interventions (CA and LAA closure device implantation).
  2. Written, informed consent by the patient or her/his legally-authorized representative for participation in the study.
  3. In women with childbearing potential a negative pregnancy test is mandatory.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Left atrial thrombus
  2. Other indication than AF for oral anticoagulation (valve prosthesis, pulmonary embolism, recurrent vein thrombosis)
  3. Contraindication for oral anticoagulation
  4. Severe valvular heart disease
  5. Severe left ventricular systolic function (ejection fraction<30%)
  6. Malignancies or other comorbid conditions (for example severe liver, renal and pancreatic disease) with life expectancy less than 12 months or that may result in protocol non-compliance.
  7. Pregnancy (present, suspected or planned) or positive pregnancy test.
  8. Patient's inability to fully cooperate with the study protocol.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Percutaneous closure of LAA
Percutaneous closure of LAA
Active Comparator: Catheter ablation of AF
Catheter ablation of AF

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
A 12-month composite endpoint of all cause death, thrombo-embolic events, major bleeding BARC type III, re-hospitalisation and severe symptoms due to arrhythmias
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Quality of Life
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
The individual components of the primary endpoint
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
Discontinuation of anticoagulation
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
Use of Antiarrhythmic Drugs
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
freedom from symptomatic arrhythmia
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Albert Schömig, MD, Deutsches Herzzentrum München
  • Principal Investigator: Steffen Massberg, MD, Deutsches Herzzentrum München
  • Principal Investigator: Isabel Deisenhofer, MD, Deutsches Herzzentrum München
  • Study Director: Sonia Ammar, MD, Deutsches Herzentrum München
  • Study Director: Julia Goedel, MD, Deutsches Herzzentrum München

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 25, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 1, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

June 2, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 11, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 10, 2017

Last Verified

April 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Atrial Fibrillation

Clinical Trials on Percutaneous closure of LAA

3
Subscribe