Bone Mineral Density in HIV+ Patients

May 31, 2016 updated by: Amy H. Warriner, University of Alabama at Birmingham

Bone Mineral Density in HIV+ Patients Recently Started on Antiretroviral Therapy (ART)

Utilizing an extremely well-characterized HIV cohort under observation as ART-naïve or since their first exposure to HIV treatment, the investigators will conduct a cross-sectional study with prospectively collected data to determine BMD in 200 subjects. Subjects identified were initially treatment naïve when entering the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) 1917 HIV Clinic between 1999 and 2010; some have been under observation without being treated with ART therapy and others were newly started on ART therapy while under observation. For each subject, the investigators will determine associations between BMD and 1) cumulative viremia, 2) ART duration, and 3) ART type.

Hypothesis 1a: BMD will be lowest in HIV+ subjects with the highest levels of cumulative viremia.

Hypothesis 1b: BMD will be greatest in HIV+ persons with longest duration of ART therapy, after excluding those subjects treated with tenofovir.

Hypotheses 1c: BMD will be lower in subjects treated with tenofovir vs. other ART agents, after controlling for duration of therapy.

Additionally, the investigators will conduct a retrospective study in 100 patients HIV+ and were ART-naïve at the time of entry into the 1917 Clinic in whom the investigators will longitudinally evaluate the relationship between HIV viral load, inflammation, and bone turnover (through the measurement of HIV copy-years viremia, interleukin-6 {IL-6}, tumor necrosis factor alpha {TNF-a}, high-sensitivity c-reactive protein {hsCRP}, osteocalcin, and urine C-telopeptide {CTX}). The investigators will compare HIV patients at a similar stage of their disease who remain treatment naïve (either due to concerns for compliance or sufficient CD4 counts without treatment) (ART-) vs. those newly started on ART (ART+).

Hypothesis 2: Viral load, markers of inflammation, and markers of bone resorption will all decrease in ART+ vs. ART- persons.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

The life expectancy of persons infected with HIV has improved greatly since the institution of combination antiretroviral therapy (cART). However, many metabolic derangements have been discovered with long-term cART therapy, including lipodystrophy, insulin resistance, and, more recently, abnormal bone metabolism. It is well documented that bone mineral density (BMD) in HIV+ patients is lower when compared with the expected BMD in non-HIV patients [1-10]. The underlying cause of lower BMD is unknown but it is felt to be a multifactorial process [10-14]. Current guidelines recommend first line treatments consist of a combination of protease inhibitor (PI) or non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) in combination with two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs). Despite the known change in BMD in HIV+ persons, less is known about the effect of antiretroviral (ART) exposure and duration of treatment, ART type, and cumulative HIV viremia on bone health. This is demonstrated by studies showing loss of BMD with use of protease inhibitors compared to other regimen [15], other studies showing more detrimental effect from NRTIs [6, 9, 16], and yet others that have shown that BMD improves with all ART therapy [17]. Tenofovir (an NRTI), in particular, has been implicated as playing a role in bone changes, possibly due to its effect at the proximal tubule leading to a Fanconi-like syndrome with phosphate wasting [18]. Tenofovir led to significant reductions in BMD of children and this loss reversed after tenofovir was stopped [9]; other studies have shown similar deleterious effects [16]. A recent study evaluating the effect of continuous ART therapy vs. intermittent use for viral suppression showed that patients receiving continuous ART had greater loss of BMD, despite an increased risk of AIDS progression, myocardial infarction, or renal- or liver-failure [19]. However, prior longitudinal studies with longer follow-up have shown that the initial loss of BMD following ART is recovered and longer-term BMD changes are similar to changes seen in HIV-negative persons [20-22]. There is evidence that there is a positive correlation between HIV viremia and proinflammatory cytokines and that up-regulated proinflammatory cytokines may play a role in both osteoclast and osteoblast function. Prior studies have shown that during HIV infection osteoblast and osteoclast function is uncoupled and following ART treatment, regulation of bone turnover and formation ensues [23]. However, changes in cytokines have not been correlated with BMD and changes in bone turnover during routine ART treatment, to our knowledge. Most studies to date have been cross-sectional studies comparing HIV+ (with varying ART exposure histories) and HIV- persons or small longitudinal studies with limited sample sizes and short duration. It is not known if the decline of proinflammatory cytokines which occurs concurrent with the fall in HIV viral loads leads to improved regulation of bone formation and hence a lower rate of bone loss and lower risk of fracture.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

200

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35242
        • UAB

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

ART-naïve patients or patients followed since their first exposure to HIV treatment at the 1917 Clinic

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All treatment naïve patients seen in the 1917 Clinic between January 1, 1999 and December 31, 2010 will be identified.
  • Of these patients, those who are currently under care at the time of the initiation of the study (>1 clinic visit in the past 12 months) will be eligible (regardless of current use of ART treatment).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with a history of chronic renal failure (estimated GFR <30ml/min) will be excluded from the study.
  • In addition, patients with a known diagnosis of a metabolic bone disease (i.e. osteoporosis, primary hyperparathyroidism, Paget Disease, Osteogenesis Imperfecta), multiple myeloma, cancer, untreated thyroid disease, or inflammatory bowel disease, or persons currently treated with or plans to begin an osteoporosis-specific medication (including estrogen) will be excluded from participation.
  • Patients treated with oral glucocorticoids and anticonvulsants will also be excluded.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
HIV+
HIV+ patients that entered the 1917 Clinic at UAB as naive to ART

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Bone Mineral Density
Time Frame: Baseline
Baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pro-inflammatory and bone turnover markers
Time Frame: 6-12 months apart
Change in IL-6, TNF-alpha, CRP, P1NP, Bone specific alkaline phosphatase, Serum NTX, and TRACP 5b at 6 and/or 12 months, as samples allow
6-12 months apart

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Amy H Warriner, MD, University of Alabama at Birmingham

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2011

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

June 1, 2014

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

June 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 16, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 20, 2011

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

June 22, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

June 2, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 31, 2016

Last Verified

May 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Osteoporosis

3
Subscribe