The Efficacy of i-Scan for Detecting Reflux Esophagitis

June 24, 2011 updated by: Konkuk University Hospital

A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of the Efficacy of i-Scan for Detecting Reflux Esophagitis

Endoscopy is a widely used modality for the diagnosis and classification of Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), and the extent of esophageal mucosal breaks on endoscopy can be assessed. However, there were some limitation in diagnosis of GERD using endoscopy

  1. More than half of patients with GERD reveal no visible abnormality on conventional endoscopy, it is possible that minute mucosal changes are underestimated by conventional endoscopy due to the limitation of visual ability
  2. In addition of uncertainty in detecting mucosal breaks, uncertainty in describing severity of mucosal injury can lead to inconsistency among interpreters. Interobserver agreement regarding diagnosis and classification of GERD using endoscopy is unsatisfactory to apply daily practice.

Thus, the development of a new method to define the intra-esophageal injury for use in daily practice is a worthwhile endeavor and developed, such as narrow-band imaging (NBI), Fuji Intelligent Chromoen-doscopy (FICE) and i-scan.

Among them, i-scan technology is the most recently developed image enhancing technology, which consists of three modes of image enhancement, i.e. surface enhancement (SE), contrast enhancement (CE), and tone enhancement (TE).

Thus, the investigators examined the hypothesis that i-scan can improve the detection rate of reflux esophagitis and inter-observer agreement between endoscopists compared with conventional white light (WL) endoscopic examination.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a condition that develops when reflux of stomach contents causes troublesome symptoms and/or complications. It is the most frequent problem in upper gastrointestinal tract in outpatient clinic and contributes substantially to morbidity and to costs. Endoscopy is a widely used modality for the diagnosis and classification of GERD, and the extent of esophageal mucosal breaks on endoscopy can be assessed. However, because more than half of patients with GERD reveal no visible abnormality on conventional endoscopy, it is possible that minute mucosal changes are underestimated by conventional endoscopy due to the limitation of visual ability.

In addition of uncertainty in detecting mucosal breaks, uncertainty in describing severity of mucosal injury can lead to inconsistency among interpreters. Asian gastroenterologists tend to diagnose endoscopically before they treat patients with symptoms suggestive of GERD and use the modified Los Angeles (LA) classification system that includes minimal changes as constituting a distinct grade of reflux esophagitis. In modified LA system, minimal change esophagitis is characterized by the mucosa such as erythema and/or whitish turbidity. However, because substantial overlap is noted between normal and minimal change, minimal change and LA class A, and LA class A and B, interobserver agreement regarding diagnosis and classification of reflux esophagitis is unsatisfactory to apply daily practice. Thus, the development of a new method to define the intra-esophageal injury for use in daily practice is a worthwhile endeavor.

Currently, new imaging technologies have applied in endoscopy to improve detecting and differentiating the subtle mucosal changes using digital contrast method such as narrow-band imaging (NBI), Fuji Intelligent Chromoen-doscopy (FICE) and i-scan. Among them, i-scan technology is the most recently developed image enhancing technology, which consists of three modes of image enhancement, i.e. surface enhancement (SE), contrast enhancement (CE), and tone enhancement (TE). SE enhances light-dark contrast and CE adds blue color in relatively dark areas digitally, by obtaining luminance intensity data for each pixel. Applying SE and CE might allow detailed observation of subtle irregularities around the surface and TE analyzes the individual RGB components of a normal image and recombines the color frequencies of each component to enhance minute mucosal structures with subtle color changes.

Thus, the investigators examined the hypothesis that i-scan can improve the detection rate of reflux esophagitis and inter-observer agreement between endoscopists compared with conventional white light (WL) endoscopic examination

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

500

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of
        • Healthcare Center, Digestive Disease Center, Konkuk University Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • aged 18 to 80 years
  • completed standard questionnaire including upper gastrointestinal symptoms
  • underwent screening endoscopy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • a patients with history of gastrointestinal surgery such as gastrectomy, fundoplication, or distal esophagectomy
  • a patients were not able to record video clips during the period of examination of the gastro-esophageal junction

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: i-scan-EGD
Examination of GE junction using conventional WL as well as i-scan mode
For all the study procedures, Pentax EPKi processor and high-resolution adult video endoscopes (EG-2890i; Pentax, Japan) with push button switch from WL to i-scan were used. I-scan consist of three modes of image enhancement including SE, CE, ant TE. For SE and CE, switching among three enhancement levels (2+,3+,4+) is possible. Although SE and CE modes can allow detailed observation of subtle mucosal irregularities, noise increases as enhancement becomes more intense. In addition, TE is possible to switch p (pit pattern), v (vessel), b (Barrett), e (esophagus), g (stomach) and c (colo-rectum) mode.
Other Names:
  • Pentax EPKi processor and EG-2890i endoscopy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To compare reflux esophagitis detection rate
Time Frame: from 2 to 3months after completeion of patients' enrollement
using videoclip (for endoscopic finding of GE junction) of WL-EGD vs. i-scan-EGD of all enrolled patients
from 2 to 3months after completeion of patients' enrollement

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To evaluate the interobserver agreement using modified LA classification
Time Frame: from 3 to 4 months after completeion of patients' enrollement
using videoclip (for endoscopic finding of GE junction) of WL-EGD vs. i-scan-EGD from 60 randomly selected enrolled patients
from 3 to 4 months after completeion of patients' enrollement

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sung Noh Hong, M.D., Konkuk University Medical Center,Konkuk University School of Medicine

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 17, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 24, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

June 27, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

June 27, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 24, 2011

Last Verified

June 1, 2011

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

Clinical Trials on i-scan

3
Subscribe