Management of Depression in Primary Care

August 15, 2016 updated by: Göteborg University

Management of Depression in Primary Health Care: a Controlled Trial on the Effectiveness of Regular, Structured, Patient-centered Visits

Most people in Sweden with mild to moderate depression are treated in primary care, but follow-up is unstructured, and we know little about whether structured, follow-up would affect the prognosis for depression and working life. The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of regular, structured, patient-centered visits on mild to moderate depression.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

258

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Gothenburg, Sweden
        • University of Gothenburg

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18 years and up
  • Attends a participating primary health care center in the region
  • Diagnosis of mild/moderate depressive disorder (new episode)
  • No change in possible antidepressant maintenance therapy during the preceding 1 month
  • Provided written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Antidepressant medication initiated or changed during the preceding 1 month
  • Patient diagnosed with major depressive disorder (BDI-II >28)
  • Patients diagnosed of severe mental psychiatric disorder (i.e. bipolar disorder, antisocial personality disorder, psychosis, substance use disorder or other serious mental disorder)
  • Suicidal ideation or intentions
  • Inability to speak and understand Swedish language well enough to take part in the activities required in the study.
  • Cognitive impairment that makes it impossible to take part in the activities required in the study
  • Does not provide written informed consent to participation in the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Structured patient visits
Participants in the intervention group visit their general practitioner at baseline and 4, 8, and 12 weeks. At each visit, participants complete MADRS-s for the assessment of depression severity and discuss the results with their GP in a patient-centered consultation.

All patients who agree to participate in the study are diagnosed by their GP with a diagnostic assessment instrument called PRIME-MD. Participants in the intervention group visit their GPs at baseline and 4, 8, and 12 weeks. At each visit, participants complete MADRS-s for the assessment of depression severity and discuss the results with their GP in a patient-centered consultation. We have chosen to use the MADRS/MADRS-S depression rating scale in this study because it is a easy to use standard instrument especially suitable for measuring change in depressive symptoms.

The control group receives treatment as usual (no intervention).

Other Names:
  • MADRS/MADRS-S depression rating scale
Other: Treatment as usual
The control group receives treatment as usual by general practitioner (no intervention).

All patients who agree to participate in the study are diagnosed by their GP with a diagnostic assessment instrument called PRIME-MD. Participants in the intervention group visit their GPs at baseline and 4, 8, and 12 weeks. At each visit, participants complete MADRS-s for the assessment of depression severity and discuss the results with their GP in a patient-centered consultation. We have chosen to use the MADRS/MADRS-S depression rating scale in this study because it is a easy to use standard instrument especially suitable for measuring change in depressive symptoms.

The control group receives treatment as usual (no intervention).

Other Names:
  • MADRS/MADRS-S depression rating scale

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Depressive symptoms
Time Frame: 3, 6 and 12 months.
Depressive symptoms will be assessed using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II), a self-administered questionnaire that measures the symptoms and severity of the depression.
3, 6 and 12 months.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Quality of life
Time Frame: 3, 6 and 12 months
Each patient's quality of life will be assessed using the EuroQoL-5D questionnaire that measures five dimensions of quality of life
3, 6 and 12 months
Prescriptions for antidepressants
Time Frame: 12-month follow-up period
Information on Antidepressant use will be collected from patient records from start of the study and the 12-month follow-up period
12-month follow-up period
Change in Activity/work ability
Time Frame: 12-month follow-up period
Will be measured by Work Ability Index (WAI) and the Karaseks Job Strain Model Questionnaire. The Work Ability Index is used for evaluating people's work capacity and Karaseks Job Strain Model Questionnaire is used for evaluating Demands-Control in work place
12-month follow-up period
sick-listing data
Time Frame: 12 month follow up
Data on sick-listing is derived from primary care record fom baseline to 3 months follow up and from patient interview from 3 to 12 months
12 month follow up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Cecila Björkelund, Professor, Göteborg University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 27, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 25, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

July 26, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

August 16, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 15, 2016

Last Verified

August 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Madrs 2010

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depression

Clinical Trials on Structured patient-centered follow up of depression

3
Subscribe