Enhanced Recovery Program After a Robotic-assisted Surgery (RAAC) of Radical Prostatectomy. PROSTA-RAAC (PROSTA-RAAC)

January 3, 2024 updated by: Elsan

There are few published data on the benefit of Enhanced recovery program in radical prostatectomy in the management of localized prostate cancer. All the studies available on the subject are retrospective (1-3).

This randomized comparative study is proposed in order to compare in a homogeneous population (place and time) the interest of RAAC specifically in this surgery.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The implementation of RAAC programs in healthcare establishments would improve the quality and safety of patient care (functional development and rapid convalescence of patients and reduction in postoperative morbidity through active prevention of perioperative complications) and optimization of care costs for health establishments and for health insurance (reduction in length of stay and convalescence, reduction in postoperative complications). Its implementation requires a strong involvement of all the teams and a transversal and multidisciplinary coordination, specifically dedicated to one type of intervention. This approach must therefore show its effectiveness by specialty and then by pathology within the same specialty.

There are few published data on the benefit of RAAC in radical prostatectomy in the management of localized prostate cancer. All the studies available on the subject are retrospective (1-3).

This randomized comparative study is proposed in order to compare in a homogeneous population (place and time) the interest of RAAC specifically in this surgery.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

135

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Nouvelle Aquitaine
      • Bordeaux, Nouvelle Aquitaine, France, 33200
        • Clinique Saint Augustin

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male over 40 and under 75
  • Patient scheduled for a robot assisted radical prostatectomy within the center
  • Affiliation to a social security scheme or beneficiary of such a scheme
  • Patient having signed the free and informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Minor, age ≤ 40 years or ≥ 75 years
  • ASA 4 or more
  • Severe or poorly balanced associated conditions
  • Covid + declared in the previous 3 months
  • Refusal to participate in the study
  • Protected patient: adult under guardianship, curatorship or other legal protection, deprived of liberty by judicial or administrative decision

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: RAAC (Program Arm)
Patient under RAAC Program
An additional paramedical visit will be carried out before the surgery. The interview is carried out by the healthcare team. An organization within the service has been set up so that a nurse can be totally seconded for the RAAC mission. The consultation lasts 30 to 45 minutes.
No Intervention: Standard Arm
Standard patient procedure

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
postoperative stay of RAAC-type treatment
Time Frame: 5 days
To assess the length of postoperative stay of RAAC-type treatment compared to standard treatment, during a robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.
5 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 27, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 21, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 21, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

December 29, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 5, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 3, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2020-A03292-37

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Quality of Life

Clinical Trials on Follow-up patient program

Subscribe