Predictive Factors of Pelvic Magnetic Resonance in the Response of Arterial Embolization of Uterine Leiomyoma

November 8, 2011 updated by: Eduardo Zlotnik, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein
The purpose of this study is to determine predictive factors in the pelvic magnetic resonance in the response of arterial embolization of uterine leiomyoma.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This study followed symptomatic premenopausal women with uterine leiomyoma who underwent uterine artery embolization (UAE). Treatment was accompanied by magnetic resonance imaging of both the volume of the entire uterus and the leiomyomas one month before and six months after UAE. This patients were treated at the Uterine Leiomyoma Sector of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medicine College of the University of São Paulo. In this study, the investigators examined 179 leiomyomas in 50 patients.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

50

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • SP
      • São Paulo, SP, Brazil, 05652 - 900
        • Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 45 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Women from the Leiomyoma Service, with eligible criteria and chose this kind of treatment between september 2008 and march 2009.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ultrasound diagnosis of uterine leiomyoma
  • presence of symptoms (menorrhalgia and/or pelvic pain)
  • indication for UAE(the desire to keep the uterus and/or contraindications for surgery).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • malignant genital neoplasms
  • pelvic inflammatory disease
  • allergy to iodinated contrast
  • coagulopathy, renal failure
  • vasculitis
  • pelvic irradiation
  • pregnancy
  • subserosal leiomyoma with a pedicle smaller than 50% of diameter of the fibroid.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Magnetic Resonanse Image
The leiomyomas were evaluated individually. MR was used to evaluate morphology: the radiological dimension(s) of the leiomyoma and uterus and the volume. The number of leiomyoma fibroid, and their location in the myometrium was classified. Perfusion and the characterization of the T2 signal were also evaluated.
The leiomyomas were evaluated individually. MR was used to evaluate morphology: the radiological dimension(s) of the leiomyoma and uterus and the volume. The number of leiomyoma fibroids was determined, and their location in the myometrium. Perfusion and the characterization of the T2 signal were also evaluated.
Other Names:
  • Magnetic Resonance Image with a high-field scanner
  • Siemens Magnetom 3-Tesla

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Leiomyoma reduction in patients who underwent uterine artery embolization
Time Frame: One month before(baseline) and six month after the embolization
Use the magnetic resonanse to evaluate factors that predicted leiomyoma reduction in patients who underwent uterine artery embolization
One month before(baseline) and six month after the embolization

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Eduardo Zlotnik, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 23, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 8, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

November 9, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

November 9, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 8, 2011

Last Verified

November 1, 2011

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Exposure to Magnetic Field

Clinical Trials on Magnetic Resonance Image

3
Subscribe