Efficacy and Safety of Gabapentin in Treating Overactive Bladder (OAB)

December 29, 2016 updated by: Michael E. Chua
Overactive bladder (OAB) syndrome as defined by International Continence Society is a pathological condition characterized by irritative symptoms: urinary urgency, with or without incontinence, urinary frequency and nocturia. The syndrome often seriously compromises the quality of life of the patients. The etiology of the OAB is considered multifactorial. Neural plasticity of bladder afferent pathways is one of the proposed mechanisms of OAB. The detrusor muscle itself has for many years been the target for drug treatment such as antimuscarinics. However, depression of detrusor contractility, may results in a reduced ability to empty the bladder and lead to some sympathetic adverse effects, which limits the treatment of OAB. Currently the focus of OAB treatment has changed to other bladder structures/mechanisms, such as afferent nerves and urothelial signaling as targets for intervention. C-fiber bladder afferents nerves may be critical for symptom generation in pathologic states such as OAB because these fibers demonstrate remarkable plasticity. Up-regulation of bladder C-fiber afferent nerve function may also play a role in urge incontinence, overactive bladder (OAB) and sensory urgency. The mechanism of Gabapentin's action for neuropathic pain has not been fully elucidated but is appears to have inhibitory activity on afferent C-fibers nerve activity; moreover, several studies had established the safety of Gabapentin in its treatment of different conditions. Due to the proposed mechanism, the investigators suggest that Gabapentin may be a new alternative for treating OAB.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

94

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • National Capital Region
      • Quezon City, National Capital Region, Philippines, 1102
        • Comprehensive Pelvic Floor Center- St. Luke's Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Ambulatory and able to use the toilet without difficulty
  • History of OAB symptoms for ≥ 3 months
  • An average of ≥ 8 micturitions per 24 hours and ≥ 1 urgency episode (with or without incontinence) per 24 hours as documented in a 3-day micturition diary
  • Subjects are bothered by symptoms as reflected by OAB-questionnaire

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient has stress or mixed incontinence
  • Patient has Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia with severe lower urinary tract symptoms based on IPSS score
  • Patient has uncontrolled Diabetes Mellitus Type II Patient has Diabetes Insipidus, UTI
  • Patient has history of interstitial cystitis, painful bladder syndrome, or chronic pelvic pain
  • Patient has a history of stroke, seizures, or major neurological disorders
  • Patient has a history of fecal incontinence and or continual urine leakage
  • Patient has had surgery to correct stress urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse within 6 months of study start
  • Patient received bladder training of electrostimulation within 2 weeks of study start
  • Patient requires a catheter
  • Patient is taking medications that cannot be stopped for the duration of the trial including certain anticholinergics or smooth muscle relaxants
  • Patient began taking tricyclic antidepressants, serotonin/norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, calcium channel blockers, ephedrine/pseudoephedrine, or diuretic therapy less than 8 weeks before study start
  • Patient has been on hormone replacement therapy for less than 12 weeks at study start
  • Patient must take medication for arrhythmia, contraindicated for Solifenacin or Gabapentin
  • Patient has multiple and/or severe allergies to foods and drugs
  • Patient regularly uses any illegal drugs

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Gabapentin
Two to three months of behavioral therapy prior to start of Gabapentin 100mg/capsule, initially 1 capsule once a day for 1 week then titrate dosage according to symptoms until maximum dose of 1500mg/day Placebo tablet of Solifenacin Succinate will titrate dose same as Solifenacin arm according to symptoms of patient
100mg/capsule initially one capsule once a day then titrate according to the symptoms of the patient upto maximum dose of 1500mg/day
Active Comparator: Solifenacin Succinate
Two to three months of behavioral therapy prior to Solifenacin Succinate 5mg/tablet initially 1 tablet once a day then titrate dosage according to symptoms upto maximum dose of 10mg/day Placebo form of Gabapentin will titrate dosage same as Gabapentin group according to symptoms of patient
5mg/tablet initially 1 tablet once a day then titrate up to maximum dose of 10mg/tab
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Two to three months of behavioral therapy prior to Placebo form of Gabapentin and Solifenacin and titrate accordingly same as the treatment arms
will titrate medications similar to the active drug group

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
improvement of symptom domain means decreased frequency to less than 8 micturitions per 24 hours, no urgency noted per 24 hrs and less that 3 wakening at bedtime for micturation.
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Mean number of Micturations per 24 hrs, Mean number of urgency episodes pe 24 hrs, mean urgency incontinence episodes per 24hrs and mean nocturia episodes per 24hrs
12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Improvement of bladder function domain means increased bladder capacity (MVV)
Time Frame: 12 weeks
12 weeks
Improvement in quality of life domain means increased overall quality of life as perceived and result in OAB-q
Time Frame: 12 weeks
12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Marcelino L Morales JR, MD, Institute of Urology, St. Luke's Medical Center, Philippines

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 4, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 5, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

December 6, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 2, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 29, 2016

Last Verified

December 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Quality of Life

Clinical Trials on Gabapentin

3
Subscribe