Radius Loading in Primary Hyperparathyroidism

April 7, 2015 updated by: John P. Bilezikian, Columbia University

Effect of Mechanical Loading on Radius Bone Density and Microarchitecture in Primary Hyperparathyroidism

The purpose of the study is to determine the effect of forearm exercise on forearm bone density in post-menopausal women with or without primary hyperparathyroidism.

The investigators hypothesize that forearm exercise will increase forearm bone density in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism more so than in patients without primary hyperparathyroidism.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT), a disease characterized by excess parathyroid hormone (PTH) and high blood calcium, is one of the most common endocrine disorders.

PHPT is seen most often in post-menopausal women. Kidney stones and bone deformities were prominent manifestations of the disease in the past, however, PHPT is now primarily asymptomatic due to incidental detection of high blood calcium levels.

Many patients with PHPT, however, have low bone mineral density (BMD) when bone mass is measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA), primarily at the forearm.

There is no effective medical therapy which increases bone density at the forearm in patients with PHPT. PTH both builds and breaks down bone, and the pathways by which PTH mediates these actions are beginning to be identified. Prior research suggests that mechanical loading shifts PTH towards building bone. Arm exercise is an attractive option for the treatment of low forearm BMD in patients with PHPT since it is often the site most affected by excess PTH.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

12

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10032
        • Columbia University Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

45 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Inclusion criteria for primary hyperparathyroidism group:

  1. Primary hyperparathyroidism (defined by an elevated serum calcium and concomitantly elevated or inappropriately normal PTH)
  2. Female sex, postmenopausal status for at least five years, ages 45-80
  3. English- or Spanish-speaking
  4. DXA T-score less than -1.0 at the one-third radius
  5. Physically capable of exercise
  6. 25-hydroxyvitamin D >20 ng/mL. The latter inclusion criterion will lead to the enrollment of some individuals whose vitamin D stores will not be frankly low. We feel, however, that it is better to study subjects in their usual state rather than replacing them with vitamin D which could add another variable that would further complicate this pilot study.

Inclusion criteria for the osteopenic control:

  1. Female sex, postmenopausal status for at least five years ages 45-80
  2. English- or Spanish-speaking
  3. DXA T-score less than -1.0 at the one-third radius
  4. Physically capable of exercise
  5. Normal serum calcium and PTH level
  6. 25-hydroxyvitamin D >20 ng/mL

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Men, premenopausal women, women less than age 45 or greater than age 80
  2. Familial hypocalciuric hypercalcemia
  3. Current or prior use of bisphosphonates (alendronate or risedronate (within 12 months), ibandronate (within 6 months), other bisphosphonate (2 years)
  4. Current use of cinacalcet
  5. Current or prior use of estrogen replacement therapy (within 2 years)
  6. Planned parathyroidectomy (within one year)
  7. Planned initiation of bisphosphonates
  8. DXA T-score greater than -1.0 at the one-third radius
  9. Cardiovascular disease or uncontrolled hypertension
  10. Exercise-limiting pulmonary diseases
  11. Malignancy other than non-melanomatous skin cancer or microscopic thyroid cancer (within 5 years)
  12. Renal failure
  13. Secondary hyperparathyroidism
  14. Celiac disease
  15. Physical/orthopedic disabilities and neurologic disorders or vasculopathies that would place the subjects at risk or limit their ability to perform exercise (eg. arthritis, carpal tunnel syndrome, rotator cuff injury, etc)
  16. Moderate or high physical activity (category 2 or 3) as assessed by the IPAQ questionnaire. This latter exclusion criterion is a measure of baseline physical activity and looks to exclude those who would have a lower likelihood of benefit by baseline participation in an exercise program.
  17. Protected individuals (institutionalized), prisoners, and any other prospective participant who might not be able to give voluntary informed consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: PHPT/ Walking + Forearm exercise
Ten participants with PHPT will be randomized to the intervention of 52 weeks of the forearm exercise program plus walking.
Participants assigned to forearm exercise will receive training in forearm strengthening exercises from a doctoral occupational therapy student. Participants will be taught 8 exercises and are performed at home. The exercise program is designed to take about 30 minutes per session.
Other Names:
  • Mechanical Loading
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: PHPT/ Walking alone
Ten participants with PHPT will be randomized to the intervention of 52 weeks of the walking program alone. Walking will consist of 30 minutes at a moderate pace every other day for 52 weeks.
Walking will consist of 30 minutes at a moderate pace every other day for 52 weeks. The walking program for all participants constitutes the control/placebo comparator.
Other Names:
  • Walking
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Osteopenia/ Walking + Forearm exercise
Ten healthy, postmenopausal women with osteopenia will be randomized to the intervention of 52 weeks of the forearm exercise program plus walking.
Participants assigned to forearm exercise will receive training in forearm strengthening exercises from a doctoral occupational therapy student. Participants will be taught 8 exercises and are performed at home. The exercise program is designed to take about 30 minutes per session.
Other Names:
  • Mechanical Loading
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Osteopenia/ Walking alone
Ten healthy, postmenopausal women with osteopenia will be randomized to the intervention of 52 weeks of the walking program alone. Walking will consist of 30 minutes at a moderate pace every other day for 52 weeks.
Walking will consist of 30 minutes at a moderate pace every other day for 52 weeks. The walking program for all participants constitutes the control/placebo comparator.
Other Names:
  • Walking

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of subjects with improved bone mass and bone quality at the 1/3 radius
Time Frame: 1 year
The primary outcome is proportion of subjects with improved bone mass and bone quality at the 1/3 radius over one year.
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: John P Bilezikian, M.D., Columbia University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2010

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

October 1, 2014

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

October 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 3, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 3, 2012

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

April 5, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

April 9, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 7, 2015

Last Verified

April 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Primary Hyperparathyroidism

Clinical Trials on Forearm exercise program

Subscribe