- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01586039
Investigating the Effects of Evening Light Exposure on Melatonin Suppression, Alertness and Nocturnal Sleep
Investigating the Effects of Evening Light Exposure on Melatonin Suppression, Alertness and Nocturnal Sleep.
The timing and quality of sleep is governed by environmental and physiologic factors. Environmental factors, especially ambient lighting can impact the circadian system and alter the timing and structure of sleep. Light exposure can also acutely alter neural activation state and impair sleep. These effects all demonstrate marked sensitivity to short-wavelength blue light with maximal sensitivity in the 460-480 nm range. The alerting effects of blue light in the evening persist for at least 3-4 hours after the lights are turned off, and can disturb subsequent sleep. Avoiding these deleterious effects of light exposure prior to sleep on subsequent sleep would be beneficial to sleep quality and potentially health.
The investigators will compare the effects of two light sources, equated for visual stimulus (lux), on multiple non-visual responses to light. The investigators will compare a 90 lux exposure of a commercially available Compact Fluorescent Light (CFL) with a novel LED white light source that is depleted in the short-wavelength visible range (Biological Illumination LCC, FL). In a within-subject design, the investigators will test the hypotheses that exposure to a blue-depleted LED as compared to a CFL exposure at (1) 90 lux or (2) 50 lux will cause significantly:
- Less melatonin suppression between melatonin onset and bedtime;
- Less subjective and objective alerting responses before bedtime;
- Less disruption of nocturnal sleep structure and quality.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115
- Brigham and Women's Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
(i) Aged between 18-30 years to reduce the confounding effects of lens aging on the transmission of light to the retina;
(ii) Non-smoking for at least 6 months;
(iii) Healthy (no medical, psychiatric or sleep disorders);
(iv) No clinically significant deviations from normal in medical history, vital signs, physical examination, blood chemistry and hematology, urine chemistry and ECG;
(v) Women of childbearing potential must agree to use an acceptable method of birth control, and must have a negative urine pregnancy test;
(vi) Body mass index of > 18 or < 30 kg/m2;
(vii) No drugs or medication likely to affect sleep or alertness, as determined by the investigators;
(viii) Habitual caffeine consumption < 300mg per day on average;
(ix) Habitual alcohol consumption < 10 alcoholic units per week on average.
Exclusion Criteria:
(i) History of alcohol or substance abuse;
(ii) Positive result on drugs of abuse screening;
(iii) Current or past history of sleep disorders, including but not limited to obstructive sleep apnea, or any significant sleep complaint;
(iv) Psychiatric disorder;
(v) Recent acute or chronic medical disorder, including but not limited to hepatic impairment and severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease;
(vi) Visual disorder, including but not limited to color blindness, or family history of glaucoma;
(vii) History of intolerance or hypersensitivity to melatonin or melatonin agonists;
(viii) Pregnancy or lactation;
(ix) Shift work;
(x) Transmeridian travel (2 or more time zones) in past 2 months;
(xi) Any other reason as determined by the Principal Investigator.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Basic Science
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Compact Fluorescent Light 90 lux
90 lux exposure of a commercially available Compact Fluorescent Light (CFL).
|
We will compare the effects of two light sources, equated for visual stimulus (lux), on multiple non-visual responses to light including melatonin suppression before bedtime.
We will compare a 90 lux exposure of a commercially available Compact Fluorescent Light (CFL) with a novel LED white light source that is depleted in the short-wavelength visible range (Biological Illumination LCC, FL).
|
Experimental: Blue-depleted LED light 90 lux
90 lux exposure of a novel LED white light source that is depleted in the short-wavelength visible range (Biological Illumination LCC, FL).
|
We will compare the effects of two light sources, equated for visual stimulus (lux), on multiple non-visual responses to light including melatonin suppression before bedtime.
We will compare a 90 lux exposure of a commercially available Compact Fluorescent Light (CFL) with a novel LED white light source that is depleted in the short-wavelength visible range (Biological Illumination LCC, FL).
|
Active Comparator: Compact Fluorescent Light 50 lux
50 lux exposure of a commercially available Compact Fluorescent Light (CFL).
|
We will compare the effects of two light sources, equated for visual stimulus (lux), on multiple non-visual responses to light including melatonin suppression before bedtime.
We will compare a 90 lux exposure of a commercially available Compact Fluorescent Light (CFL) with a novel LED white light source that is depleted in the short-wavelength visible range (Biological Illumination LCC, FL).
|
Experimental: Blue-depleted LED light 50 lux
50 lux exposure of a novel LED white light source that is depleted in the short-wavelength visible range (Biological Illumination LCC, FL).
|
We will compare the effects of two light sources, equated for visual stimulus (lux), on multiple non-visual responses to light including melatonin suppression before bedtime.
We will compare a 90 lux exposure of a commercially available Compact Fluorescent Light (CFL) with a novel LED white light source that is depleted in the short-wavelength visible range (Biological Illumination LCC, FL).
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Melatonin Suppression
Time Frame: 6-h constant posture interval of the light exposure
|
Melatonin suppression is measured as the percentage of melatonin AUC relative to the AUC measured in dim light on the previous day.
AUC was calculated during the 6 h of light exposure and the corresponding 6-h interval 24 hours earlier.
Higher values indicate more light-induced melatonin suppression.
|
6-h constant posture interval of the light exposure
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Sleep Structure
Time Frame: 8-h time in bed immediately following CFL/LED light exposure.
|
Sleep efficiency assessed by polysomnography.
Sleep efficiency refers to the percentage of time a person sleeps, in relation to the amount of time a person spends in bed trying to sleep.
The percentage is calculated by dividing the Total Sleep Time by the Total Time in Bed.
|
8-h time in bed immediately following CFL/LED light exposure.
|
Sleep Quality
Time Frame: First morning after 8-h time in bed immediately following CFL/LED light exposure.
|
Self-reported sleep quality was assessed using a post sleep questionnaire.
Score on subjective scale range 1-7, higher scores indicate higher sleep quality.
|
First morning after 8-h time in bed immediately following CFL/LED light exposure.
|
Subjective Alerting Response
Time Frame: 6-h constant posture interval of the light exposure.
|
Self-reported sleepiness measured during the light exposure using the Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS).
Range of scores 1-9, higher score indicate higher subjective sleepiness.
Measures were taken hourly throughout the 6-hour constant posture interval of the light exposure and then averaged to calculate a single value per participant.
|
6-h constant posture interval of the light exposure.
|
Objective Alerting Response
Time Frame: 6-h constant posture interval of the light exposure
|
Mean reaction time assessed using the 10-minute psychomotor vigilance test.
Higher numbers indicate slower reaction times indicating less alertness.
Measures were taken hourly throughout the 6-hour constant posture interval of the light exposure and then averaged to calculate a single value per participant.
|
6-h constant posture interval of the light exposure
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Steven W Lockley, Ph.D., Brigham and Women's Hospital; Harvard Medical School
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2011-P-002834
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Non-visual Photoreception
-
Brigham and Women's HospitalActive, not recruiting
-
Sun Yat-sen UniversityCompletedDiagnositic Efficacy of Deep Convolutional Neural Network in Differentiation of Glaucoma Visual Field From Non-glaucoma Visual FieldChina
-
Stanford UniversityNational Eye Institute (NEI)Enrolling by invitationRepetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation | Visual Attention | Visual Cortical PlasticityUnited States
-
Brigham and Women's HospitalRecruitingIncidental Findings | Visual Attention | Visual Search | Hybrid SearchUnited States
-
Weill Medical College of Cornell UniversityCompletedIntraocular Pressure | Visual Acuity | Visual DisturbanceUnited States
-
University of TorontoKensington Eye InstituteTerminatedCataracts | Visual Acuity Reduced Transiently | Loss of Visual Contrast Sensitivity | Functional Visual LossCanada
-
Universitat Politècnica de CatalunyaNot yet recruiting
-
Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.Completed
-
Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.CompletedVisual AcuityUnited States
-
Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.Completed
Clinical Trials on Visible light
-
Brigham and Women's HospitalActive, not recruiting
-
University of BernNot yet recruitingExposure to Man-made Visible LightSwitzerland
-
University of BernActive, not recruitingExposure to Man-made Visible LightSwitzerland
-
University of BernCompletedExposure to Man-made Visible LightSwitzerland
-
University of BernCompletedExposure to Man-made Visible LightSwitzerland
-
University of BernNot yet recruitingExposure to Man-made Visible LightSwitzerland
-
Henry Ford Health SystemActive, not recruiting
-
German Research FoundationTechnical University of MunichCompletedWound Infection Rate After Surgery | Impact of Wound Infection on Pain and Wound HealingGermany
-
Centre de Pharmacologie Clinique Applique a la...BIODERMACompleted
-
Henry Ford Health SystemTerminatedGeneralized VitiligoUnited States