Diagnostic Efficacy of CNN in Differentiation of Visual Field

January 23, 2020 updated by: Xiulan Zhang, Sun Yat-sen University

Diagnostic Efficacy of Convolutional Neural Network Based Algorithm in Differentiation of Glaucomatous Visual Field From Non-glaucomatous Visual Field

Glaucoma is currently the leading cause of irreversible blindness in the world. The multi-center study is designed to evaluate the efficacy of the convolutional neural network based algorithm in differentiation of glaucomatous from non-glaucomatous visual field, and to assess its utility in the real world.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Glaucoma is the world's leading cause of irreversible blind, characterized by progressive retinal nerve fiber layer thinning and visual field defects. Visual field test is one of the gold standards for diagnosis and evaluation of progression of glaucoma. However, there is no universally accepted standard for the interpretation of visual field results, which is subjective and requires a large amount of experience. At present, artificial intelligence has achieved the accuracy comparable to human physicians in the interpretation of medical imaging of many different diseases. Previously, we have trained a deep convolutional neural network to read the visual field reports, which has even higher diagnostic efficacy than ophthalmologists. The current multi-center study is designed to evaluate the efficacy of the convolutional neural network based algorithm in differentiation of glaucomatous from non-glaucomatous visual field, compare its performance with ophthalmologists and to assess its utility in the real world.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

437

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 51000
        • Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients from clinics in different eye centers across China. Each subject must be diagnosed based on comprehensive medical tests and medical records. The leading center will read all the medical data to give out diagnosis as the gold standard.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age≥18;
  2. Informed consent obtained;
  3. Diagnosed with specific ocular diseases;
  4. Able to perform visual field test

Exclusion Criteria:

Incomplete clinical data to support diagnosis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
AI group
The visual field reports in this group will be evaluated by the convolutional neural network.
The visual fields collected would be assessed by the algorithm and ophthalmologists independently. The performance of the algorithm and the ophthalmologists would be compared, including accuracy, AUC, sensitivity and specificity.
Other Names:
  • Standard diagnostic procedure
Human group
The visual field reports in this group will be evaluated by 3 ophthalmologists independently.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
AUC value of convolutional neural network in differentiation of Glaucoma visual field from non-glaucoma visual field
Time Frame: from Jan 2019 to Jan 2020
from Jan 2019 to Jan 2020

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Sensitivity and specificity of convolutional neural network in detection of glaucoma visual field
Time Frame: from Jan 2019 to Jan 2020
from Jan 2019 to Jan 2020

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

March 15, 2019

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

December 31, 2019

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

December 31, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 26, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 28, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

November 30, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

January 27, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 23, 2020

Last Verified

January 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2018KYPJ125

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on AI diagnostic algorithm

3
Subscribe