The Incidence of Glistenings in the 2017 Intraocular Lenses Made by Alcon and Abbott Medical Optics

December 1, 2023 updated by: Yaping Jin, University of Toronto

The Incidence of Glistenings in the 2017 Generation of Hydrophobic Acrylic Lenses Manufactured by Alcon and Abbott Medical Optics

The purpose of this study is to seek academic/non-industry research funding support to independently investigate the incidence and density of lens glistenings in cataract patients who are implanted with the latest generations of intraocular lenses (IOL) manufactured by Alcon and AMO Medical Optics.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Glistenings are tiny, clear sparkling, fluid-filled microvacuoles that form within a lens after it has been placed in the eye. Glistenings are seen in all lenses but certain lenses develop a higher number of glistenings than others. The effect of glistenings on patients' visual functioning is largely unknown.

The occurrence of glistenings is in part related to the manufacturing technique. In 2013, manufacturers have claimed that recent improvements in manufacturing process have reduced the occurrence of glistenings. There is a lack of independent evaluation of this claim. We would like to assess independently: 1) How frequently do glistenings occur in patients implanted with the 2015 generation lenses? 2) Is there a difference in glistening occurrence between lenses manufactured by Alcon and Abbott Medical Optics (AMO) - the two largest companies in eye care products?

Two-hundred and seventy-six patients will be randomly assigned to receive Alcon or AMO lenses for their cataract surgery at the Kensington Eye Institute (KEI). After surgery, patients will be instructed to return for follow-up visits at 1 month, 6 months, 12 months and 18 months to assess for the occurrence of glistenings. If glistenings are observed at an earlier follow-up visit (e.g., the 6 month visit), patients will still be instructed to come for future visits so that changes in the glistenings over time can be observed.

Project Time-line:

Months 1-8: Participants recruiting, surgical operations, follow-up visits. Months 9-24: follow-up visits, data entry, cleaning and analysis, early results presentation, manuscript preparation and final report.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

22

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5T3A9
        • Kensington Eye Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients consulting 5 surgeons for cataract surgery in the surgeon's primary offices
  • Patients aged 18 years or older
  • Patients who signed the consent form

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals who cannot understand English in either written or verbal form and do not have language assistance available (e.g. from family members, friends)
  • Patients with co-existing condition of corneal disease
  • Patients with co-existing condition of uveitis
  • Patients with co-existing condition of optic nerve disease
  • Patients with co-existing condition of macular disease
  • Patients with co-existing condition of diabetes
  • Patients with co-existing condition of severe glaucoma (i.e. C/D ratio >=0.9 AND the patient is on glaucoma treatment)
  • Patients with prior refractive surgery
  • Patients with complications of cataract surgery occurred during or after surgery

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Alcon lens group
Alcon 1 piece SA60AT lens
Optic Diameter: 6.0 mm, Overall length: 13.0 mm, Material: Ultraviolet-absorbing Acrylate/Methacrylate Copolymer
Active Comparator: AMO lens group
AMO 1 piece Sensar AABOO lens
Optic Diameter: 6.0 mm, Overall length: 13.0 mm, Material: Ultraviolet-blocking hydrophobic acrylic

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence and density (severity) of glistenings at 18-month follow-up visit
Time Frame: 18-month follow-up

To determine if glistenings develop, eyes are dilated and examined. Photographs of the IOLs will be taken with a slit lamp camera for documentation. These photographs will then be assessed for glistenings in two ways: first by trained ophthalmology staff, and second using the ImageJ software

Glistenings will be counted and graded on a scale of 0 to 5+ as following:

0. No glistening

  1. Less than 10 glistenings
  2. 10 to 25 glistenings
  3. 25 to 50 glistenings
  4. 50 to 100 glistenings
  5. Greater than 100 glistenings
18-month follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual acuity in eyes with glistenings at 18-month follow-up visit
Time Frame: 18 month follow-up
Best corrected visual acuity: acuteness/clearness of vision. This will be tested with the ETDRS (early treatment diabetic retinopathy study) chart.
18 month follow-up
Contrast sensitivity in eyes with glistenings at 18-month follow-up visit
Time Frame: 18 month follow-up
Contrast sensitivity: the ability of the visual system to distinguish between an object and its background. This will be tested with the Vector Vision CSV-1000HGT.
18 month follow-up
Glare disability in eyes with glistenings at 18-month follow-up visit
Time Frame: 18 month follow-up
Glare disability: the difficulty seeing in the presence of very bright light such as night-time lighting or sunshine. This will be tested using the Brightness Acuity Tester (BAT).
18 month follow-up
Visual acuity in eyes with glistenings at 12-month follow-up visit
Time Frame: 12-month follow-up
Best corrected visual acuity: acuteness/clearness of vision. This will be tested with the ETDRS (early treatment diabetic retinopathy study) chart
12-month follow-up
Contrast sensitivity and glare disability in eyes with glistenings at 12-month follow-up visit
Time Frame: 12-month follow-up
Contrast sensitivity: the ability of the visual system to distinguish between an object and its background. This will be tested with the Vector Vision CSV-1000HGT.
12-month follow-up
Glare disability in eyes with glistenings at 12-month follow-up visit
Time Frame: 12-month follow-up
Glare disability: the difficulty seeing in the presence of very bright light such as night-time lighting or sunshine. This will be tested using the Brightness Acuity Tester (BAT).
12-month follow-up
Visual acuity in eyes with glistenings at 6-month follow-up visit
Time Frame: 6-month follow-up
Best corrected visual acuity: acuteness/clearness of vision. This will be tested with the ETDRS (early treatment diabetic retinopathy study) chart.
6-month follow-up
Contrast sensitivity in eyes with glistenings at 6-month follow-up visit
Time Frame: 6-month follow-up
Contrast sensitivity: the ability of the visual system to distinguish between an object and its background. This will be tested with the Vector Vision CSV-1000HGT.
6-month follow-up
Glare disability in eyes with glistenings at 6-month follow-up visit
Time Frame: 6-month follow-up
Glare disability: the difficulty seeing in the presence of very bright light such as night-time lighting or sunshine. This will be tested using the Brightness Acuity Tester (BAT).
6-month follow-up
Incidence of glistenings at 12-month follow-up visit
Time Frame: 12-month follow-up

To determine if glistenings develop, eyes are dilated and examined. Photographs of the IOLs will be taken with a slit lamp camera for documentation. These photographs will then be assessed for glistenings in two ways: first by trained ophthalmology staff, and second using the ImageJ software

Glistenings will be counted and graded on a scale of 0 to 5+ as following:

0. No glistening

  1. Less than 10 glistenings
  2. 10 to 25 glistenings
  3. 25 to 50 glistenings
  4. 50 to 100 glistenings
  5. Greater than 100 glistenings
12-month follow-up
Incidence of glistenings at 6-month follow-up visit
Time Frame: 6-month follow-up

To determine if glistenings develop, eyes are dilated and examined. Photographs of the IOLs will be taken with a slit lamp camera for documentation. These photographs will then be assessed for glistenings in two ways: first by trained ophthalmology staff, and second using the ImageJ software

Glistenings will be counted and graded on a scale of 0 to 5+ as following:

0. No glistening

  1. Less than 10 glistenings
  2. 10 to 25 glistenings
  3. 25 to 50 glistenings
  4. 50 to 100 glistenings
  5. Greater than 100 glistenings
6-month follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sherif El-Defrawy, MD, FRCSC, University of Toronto
  • Principal Investigator: Yaping Jin, MD, PhD, University of Toronto

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 11, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 31, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

March 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 18, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 23, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

January 24, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 8, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 1, 2023

Last Verified

December 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 108162330RR0001

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cataracts

Clinical Trials on Alcon 1 piece SA60AT lens

Subscribe