Ceftazidime-Avibactam Compared With Doripenem Followed by Oral Therapy for Hospitalized Adults With Complicated UTIs (Urinary Tract Infections)

August 31, 2017 updated by: Pfizer

A Phase III, Randomized, Multicenter, Double-Blind, Double Dummy, Parallel Group, Comparative Study to Determine the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Ceftazidime Avibactam (CAZ-AVI, Formerly CAZ104) Versus Doripenem Followed by Appropriate Oral Therapy in the Treatment of Complicated Urinary Tract Infections, Including Acute Pyelonephritis, With a Gram Negative Pathogen in Hospitalized Adults

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of Ceftazidime Avibactam compared to Doripenem for treating hospitalized patients with complicated urinary tract infections, including acute pyelonephritis

Study Overview

Detailed Description

A Phase III, Randomized, Multicenter, Double-Blind, Double Dummy, Parallel Group, Comparative Study to Determine the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Ceftazidime Avibactam (CAZ-AVI, formerly CAZ104) Versus Doripenem Followed by Appropriate Oral Therapy in the Treatment of Complicated Urinary Tract Infections, Including Acute Pyelonephritis, With a Gram Negative Pathogen in Hospitalized Adults

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

598

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Cordoba, Argentina
        • Research Site
      • Corrientes, Argentina
        • Research Site
      • Córdoba, Argentina
        • Research Site
      • Mendoza, Argentina
        • Research Site
      • Santa Fe, Argentina
        • Research Site
      • Belo Horizonte, Brazil
        • Research Site
      • Campinas/SP, Brazil
        • Research Site
      • Salvador, Brazil
        • Research Site
      • São José do Rio Preto - SP, Brazil
        • Research Site
      • São Paulo, Brazil
        • Research Site
      • Vila Clementino, Brazil
        • Research Site
      • Pleven, Bulgaria
        • Research Site
      • Ruse, Bulgaria
        • Research Site
      • Sofia, Bulgaria
        • Research Site
      • Zagreb, Croatia
        • Research Site
      • Kyjov, Czechia
        • Research Site
      • Opava, Czechia
        • Research Site
      • Jena, Germany
        • Research Site
      • Wuppertal, Germany
        • Research Site
      • Athens, Greece
        • Research Site
      • Budapest, Hungary
        • Research Site
      • Nagykanizsa, Hungary
        • Research Site
      • Nyíregyháza, Hungary
        • Research Site
      • Zalaegerszeg, Hungary
        • Research Site
      • Jerusalem, Israel
        • Research Site
      • Petach-Tikva, Israel
        • Research Site
      • Safed, Israel
        • Research Site
      • Fukuoka-shi, Japan
        • Research Site
      • Koshigaya-shi, Japan
        • Research Site
      • Kyoto-shi, Japan
        • Research Site
      • Nagoya-shi, Japan
        • Research Site
      • Nara-shi, Japan
        • Research Site
      • Oita-shi, Japan
        • Research Site
      • Sendai-shi, Japan
        • Research Site
      • Sunto-gun, Japan
        • Research Site
      • Tokushima-shi, Japan
        • Research Site
      • Ueda-shi, Japan
        • Research Site
      • Utsunomiya-shi, Japan
        • Research Site
      • Busan, Korea, Republic of
        • Research Site
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of
        • Research Site
      • Wonju, Korea, Republic of
        • Research Site
      • Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico
        • Research Site
      • Inowrocław, Poland
        • Research Site
      • Krakow, Poland
        • Research Site
      • Warszawa, Poland
        • Research Site
      • Lisboa, Portugal
        • Research Site
      • Brasov, Romania
        • Research Site
      • Bucharest, Romania
        • Research Site
      • Bucuresti, Romania
        • Research Site
      • Cluj, Romania
        • Research Site
      • Craiova, Romania
        • Research Site
      • Iasi, Romania
        • Research Site
      • Arkhangelsk, Russian Federation
        • Research Site
      • Krasnodar, Russian Federation
        • Research Site
      • Moscow, Russian Federation
        • Research Site
      • Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
        • Research Site
      • Penza, Russian Federation
        • Research Site
      • Rostov-on-Don, Russian Federation
        • Research Site
      • Saratov, Russian Federation
        • Research Site
      • St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
        • Research Site
      • St.Petersburg, Russian Federation
        • Research Site
      • Vsevolozhsk, Russian Federation
        • Research Site
      • Belgrade, Serbia
        • Research Site
      • Kragujevac, Serbia
        • Research Site
      • Poprad, Slovakia
        • Research Site
      • Presov, Slovakia
        • Research Site
      • Trnava, Slovakia
        • Research Site
      • Zilina, Slovakia
        • Research Site
      • Chiayi, Taiwan
        • Research Site
      • Taipei, Taiwan
        • Research Site
      • Diyarbakir, Turkey
        • Research Site
      • Cherkasy, Ukraine
        • Research Site
      • Dnipropetrovsk, Ukraine
        • Research Site
      • Kharkiv, Ukraine
        • Research Site
      • Kyiv, Ukraine
        • Research Site
      • Lviv, Ukraine
        • Research Site
      • Mykolaiv, Ukraine
        • Research Site
      • Odesa, Ukraine
        • Research Site
      • Odessa, Ukraine
        • Research Site
      • Uzhhorod, Ukraine
        • Research Site
      • Zaporizhzhya, Ukraine
        • Research Site
    • California
      • Sylmar, California, United States
        • Research Site
    • Michigan
      • Royal Oak, Michigan, United States
        • Research Site
    • Ohio
      • Lima, Ohio, United States
        • Research Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 90 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 to 90 years of age inclusive
  • Female patients can participate if they are surgically sterile or completed menopause or females capable of having children and agree not to attempt pregnancy while receiving IV study therapy and for a period of 7 days after
  • Has pyuria with >/= 10 WBCs (white blood cell) and has a positive urine culture within 48 hours of enrollment containing >/=10 to the fifth CFU (colony forming unit ) /ml of a recognized uropathogen known to be susceptible to IV study therapy (CAZ-AVI and doripenem)
  • Demonstrates either acute pyelonephritis or complicated lower UTI without pyelonephritis.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Urine pathogen is a Gram-positive pathogen or a uropathogen resistant to CAZ-AVI or doripenem
  • Patient's urine culture at study entry isolates more than 2 microorganisms regardless of colony count or patient has a confirmed fungal UTI
  • Patient is receiving hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis or had a renal transplant
  • Patient is immunocompromised
  • Patient is considered unlikely to survive the 6- to 8-week study period or has a rapidly progressive or terminal illness including septic shock which is associated with a high risk of mortality

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: QUADRUPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Ceftazidime - Avibactam ( CAZ-AVI)
IV treatment
Ceftazidime 2000 mg and 500 mg of avibactam. Patients randomized to receive CAZ-AVI will receive an infusion of CAZ-AVI (2000 mg ceftazidime and 500 mg avibactam) every 8 hours administered by intravenous (IV) infusion in a volume of 100 mL at a constant rate over 120 minutes
Patients are eligible for oral switch after receiving 5 full days of IV therapy and have met protocol specified criteria for clinical improvement
Patients are eligible for oral switch after receiving 5 full days of IV therapy and have met protocol specified criteria for clinical improvement
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Doripenem
IV treatment
Patients are eligible for oral switch after receiving 5 full days of IV therapy and have met protocol specified criteria for clinical improvement
Patients are eligible for oral switch after receiving 5 full days of IV therapy and have met protocol specified criteria for clinical improvement
500 mg of Doripenem. Patients randomized to receive Doripenem will receive an infusion of Doripenem 500 mg every 8 hours administered by intravenous (IV) infusion in a volume of 100 mL at a constant rate over 60 minutes

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient-reported Symptomatic Response at Day 5 (mMITT Analysis Set): Non-inferiority Hypothesis Test
Time Frame: At Day 5 visit. Day 5 visit is based on 24 hour periods from the first dose date and time.
Number of patients with symptomatic resolution (or return to premorbid state) of UTI-specific symptoms except flank pain (frequency/urgency/dysuria/suprapubic pain) with resolution of or improvement in flank pain based on the patient-reported symptom assessment response at the Day 5 visit in the mMITT analysis set. The sponsor will conclude noninferiority if the lower limit of the 95% CI of difference (corresponding to a 97.5% 1-sided lower bound) is greater than -12.5% for both FDA coprimary outcome variables (symptomatic resolution at day 5 or favorable combined response at test of cure (TOC)).
At Day 5 visit. Day 5 visit is based on 24 hour periods from the first dose date and time.
Combined Patient-reported Symptomatic and Microbiological Response at TOC (mMITT Analysis Set): Non-inferiority Hypothesis Test
Time Frame: At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization.
Number of patients with both a favorable per patient microbiological response and symptomatic resolution (or return to premorbid state) of all UTI-specific symptoms (frequency/urgency/dysuria/suprapubic pain/flank pain) based on the patient-reported symptom assessment response at the TOC visit in the mMITT analysis set. The sponsor will conclude noninferiority if the lower limit of the 95% CI of difference (corresponding to a 97.5% 1-sided lower bound) is greater than -12.5% for both FDA coprimary outcome variables (symptomatic resolution at day 5 or favorable combined response at test of cure (TOC)).
At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization.
Per-patient Microbiological Response at TOC (mMITT Analysis Set): Non-inferiority Hypothesis Test
Time Frame: At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization.
Number of patients with a favorable per patient microbiological response at TOC. The primary efficacy outcome variable for ROW is the proportion of patients with a favorable per-patient microbiological response at the TOC visit in the mMITT analysis set.
At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Per-patient Microbiological Response at EOT (IV) (mMITT Analysis Set)
Time Frame: At EOT (IV) visit. EOT (IV) visit is Within 24 hours after completion of the last infusion of IV study therapy and on/before the first dose for oral study therapy
Number of patients with a favorable per-patient microbiological response at EOT (IV)
At EOT (IV) visit. EOT (IV) visit is Within 24 hours after completion of the last infusion of IV study therapy and on/before the first dose for oral study therapy
Per-patient Microbiological Response at LFU (mMITT Analysis Set)
Time Frame: At LFU visit. LFU visit is 45 to 52 days from Randomization.
Number of patients with a favorable per patient microbiological response at LFU
At LFU visit. LFU visit is 45 to 52 days from Randomization.
Per-patient Microbiological Response at EOT (IV) (ME at EOT (IV) Analysis Set)
Time Frame: At EOT (IV) visit. EOT (IV) visit is Within 24 hours after completion of the last infusion of IV study therapy and on/before the first dose for oral study therapy
Number of patients with a favorable per-patient microbiological response at EOT (IV)
At EOT (IV) visit. EOT (IV) visit is Within 24 hours after completion of the last infusion of IV study therapy and on/before the first dose for oral study therapy
Per-patient Microbiological Response at TOC (ME at TOC Analysis Set)
Time Frame: At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization.
Number of patients with a favorable per patient microbiological response at TOC
At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization.
Per-patient Microbiological Response at LFU (ME at LFU Analysis Set)
Time Frame: At LFU visit. LFU visit is 45 to 52 days from Randomization.
Number of patients with a favorable per patient microbiological response at LFU
At LFU visit. LFU visit is 45 to 52 days from Randomization.
Per-patient Microbiological Response at EOT (IV) (Extended ME at EOT (IV) Analysis Set)
Time Frame: At EOT (IV) visit. EOT (IV) visit is Within 24 hours after completion of the last infusion of IV study therapy and on/before the first dose for oral study therapy
Number of patients with a favorable per-patient microbiological response at EOT (IV)
At EOT (IV) visit. EOT (IV) visit is Within 24 hours after completion of the last infusion of IV study therapy and on/before the first dose for oral study therapy
Per-patient Microbiological Response at TOC (Extended ME at TOC Analysis Set)
Time Frame: At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization.
Number of patients with a favorable per patient microbiological response at TOC
At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization.
Per-patient Microbiological Response at LFU (Extended ME at LFU Analysis Set)
Time Frame: At LFU visit. LFU visit is 45 to 52 days from Randomization.
Number of patients with a favorable per patient microbiological response at LFU
At LFU visit. LFU visit is 45 to 52 days from Randomization.
Investigator Determined Clinical Response at EOT (IV) (mMITT Analysis Set)
Time Frame: At EOT (IV) visit. EOT (IV) visit is Within 24 hours after completion of the last infusion of IV study therapy and on/before the first dose for oral study therapy
Number of patients with a clinical cure at EOT (IV). The investigator should consider the entirety of the patient's clinical course and current status, including an evaluation of signs and symptoms (eg, fever, dysuria, costovertebral angle tenderness) and physical examination in order to classify the patient's clinical response.
At EOT (IV) visit. EOT (IV) visit is Within 24 hours after completion of the last infusion of IV study therapy and on/before the first dose for oral study therapy
Investigator Determined Clinical Response at TOC (mMITT Analysis Set)
Time Frame: At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization.
Number of patients with a clinical cure at TOC. The investigator should consider the entirety of the patient's clinical course and current status, including an evaluation of signs and symptoms (eg, fever, dysuria, costovertebral angle tenderness) and physical examination in order to classify the patient's clinical response.
At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization.
Investigator Determined Clinical Response at LFU (mMITT Analysis Set)
Time Frame: At LFU visit. LFU visit is 45 to 52 days from Randomization.
Number of patients with a clinical cure at LFU. The investigator should consider the entirety of the patient's clinical course and current status, including an evaluation of signs and symptoms (eg, fever, dysuria, costovertebral angle tenderness) and physical examination in order to classify the patient's clinical response.
At LFU visit. LFU visit is 45 to 52 days from Randomization.
Investigator Determined Clinical Response at EOT (IV) (ME at EOT (IV) Analysis Set)
Time Frame: At EOT (IV) visit. EOT (IV) visit is Within 24 hours after completion of the last infusion of IV study therapy and on/before the first dose for oral study therapy
Number of patients with a clinical cure at EOT (IV). The investigator should consider the entirety of the patient's clinical course and current status, including an evaluation of signs and symptoms (eg, fever, dysuria, costovertebral angle tenderness) and physical examination in order to classify the patient's clinical response.
At EOT (IV) visit. EOT (IV) visit is Within 24 hours after completion of the last infusion of IV study therapy and on/before the first dose for oral study therapy
Investigator Determined Clinical Response at TOC (ME at TOC Analysis Set)
Time Frame: At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization.
Number of patients with a clinical cure at TOC. The investigator should consider the entirety of the patient's clinical course and current status, including an evaluation of signs and symptoms (eg, fever, dysuria, costovertebral angle tenderness) and physical examination in order to classify the patient's clinical response.
At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization.
Investigator Determined Clinical Response at LFU (ME at LFU Analysis Set)
Time Frame: At LFU visit. LFU visit is 45 to 52 days from Randomization.
Number of patients with a clinical cure at LFU. The investigator should consider the entirety of the patient's clinical course and current status, including an evaluation of signs and symptoms (eg, fever, dysuria, costovertebral angle tenderness) and physical examination in order to classify the patient's clinical response.
At LFU visit. LFU visit is 45 to 52 days from Randomization.
Investigator Determined Clinical Response at EOT (IV) (Extended ME at EOT (IV) Analysis Set)
Time Frame: At EOT (IV) visit. EOT (IV) visit is Within 24 hours after completion of the last infusion of IV study therapy and on/before the first dose for oral study therapy
Number of patients with a clinical cure at EOT (IV). The investigator should consider the entirety of the patient's clinical course and current status, including an evaluation of signs and symptoms (eg, fever, dysuria, costovertebral angle tenderness) and physical examination in order to classify the patient's clinical response.
At EOT (IV) visit. EOT (IV) visit is Within 24 hours after completion of the last infusion of IV study therapy and on/before the first dose for oral study therapy
Investigator Determined Clinical Response at TOC (Extended ME at TOC Analysis Set)
Time Frame: At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization.
Number of patients with a clinical cure at TOC. The investigator should consider the entirety of the patient's clinical course and current status, including an evaluation of signs and symptoms (eg, fever, dysuria, costovertebral angle tenderness) and physical examination in order to classify the patient's clinical response.
At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization.
Investigator Determined Clinical Response at LFU (Extended ME at LFU Analysis Set)
Time Frame: At LFU visit. LFU visit is 45 to 52 days from Randomization.
Number of patients with a clinical cure at LFU. The investigator should consider the entirety of the patient's clinical course and current status, including an evaluation of signs and symptoms (eg, fever, dysuria, costovertebral angle tenderness) and physical examination in order to classify the patient's clinical response.
At LFU visit. LFU visit is 45 to 52 days from Randomization.
Investigator Determined Clinical Response at EOT (IV) (CE at EOT (IV) Analysis Set)
Time Frame: At EOT (IV) visit. EOT (IV) visit is Within 24 hours after completion of the last infusion of IV study therapy and on/before the first dose for oral study therapy
Number of patients with a clinical cure at EOT (IV). The investigator should consider the entirety of the patient's clinical course and current status, including an evaluation of signs and symptoms (eg, fever, dysuria, costovertebral angle tenderness) and physical examination in order to classify the patient's clinical response.
At EOT (IV) visit. EOT (IV) visit is Within 24 hours after completion of the last infusion of IV study therapy and on/before the first dose for oral study therapy
Investigator Determined Clinical Response at TOC (CE at TOC Analysis Set)
Time Frame: At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization.
Number of patients with a clinical cure at TOC. The investigator should consider the entirety of the patient's clinical course and current status, including an evaluation of signs and symptoms (eg, fever, dysuria, costovertebral angle tenderness) and physical examination in order to classify the patient's clinical response.
At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization.
Investigator Determined Clinical Response at LFU (CE at LFU Analysis Set)
Time Frame: At LFU visit. LFU visit is 45 to 52 days from Randomization.
Number of patients with a clinical cure at LFU. The investigator should consider the entirety of the patient's clinical course and current status, including an evaluation of signs and symptoms (eg, fever, dysuria, costovertebral angle tenderness) and physical examination in order to classify the patient's clinical response.
At LFU visit. LFU visit is 45 to 52 days from Randomization.
Investigator Determined Clinical Response at TOC for Patients Infected by Ceftazidime-resistant Gram-negative Pathogen (mMITT Analysis Set)
Time Frame: At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization.
Clinical cure at the TOC visit for patients infected with a ceftazidime resistant pathogen in the mMITT analysis set. Includes patients infected by at least one ceftazidime-resistant Gram-negative pathogen.
At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization.
Investigator Determined Clinical Response at TOC for Patients Infected by Ceftazidime-resistant Gram-negative Pathogen (ME at TOC Analysis Set)
Time Frame: At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization.
Clinical cure at the TOC visit for patients infected with a ceftazidime resistant pathogen in the ME at TOC analysis set. Includes patients infected by at least one ceftazidime-resistant Gram-negative pathogen.
At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization.
Investigator Determined Clinical Response at TOC for Patients Infected by Ceftazidime-resistant Gram-negative Pathogen (Extended ME at TOC Analysis Set)
Time Frame: At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization.
Clinical cure at the TOC visit for patients infected with a ceftazidime resistant pathogen in the Extended ME at TOC analysis set. Includes patients infected by at least one ceftazidime-resistant Gram-negative pathogen.
At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization.
Per-patient Microbiological Response at TOC in Patients Infected by Ceftazidime-resistant Gram-negative Pathogen (mMITT Analysis Set)
Time Frame: At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization.
Favorable per-patient microbiological response at the TOC visit for patients infected with a ceftazidime resistant pathogen in the mMITT analysis set.
At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization.
Per-patient Microbiological Response at TOC in Patients Infected by Ceftazidime-resistant Gram-negative Pathogen (ME at TOC Analysis Set)
Time Frame: At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization.
Favorable per-patient microbiological response at the TOC visit for patients infected with a ceftazidime resistant pathogen in the ME at TOC analysis set.
At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization.
Per-patient Microbiological Response at TOC in Patients Infected by Ceftazidime-resistant Gram-negative Pathogen (Extended ME at TOC Analysis Set)
Time Frame: At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization.
Favorable per-patient microbiological response at the TOC visit for patients infected with a ceftazidime resistant pathogen in the Extended ME at TOC analysis set.
At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization.
Time to First Defervescence While on IV Study Therapy (mMITT Analysis Set)
Time Frame: Time to first defervescence is defined as the time (in days) from the first dose of IV study therapy to first absence of fever, which is temperature ≤ 37.8 C in a 24-hour period.
Time to first defervescence while on IV study therapy in patients in the mMITT analysis set who have fever at study entry.
Time to first defervescence is defined as the time (in days) from the first dose of IV study therapy to first absence of fever, which is temperature ≤ 37.8 C in a 24-hour period.
Time to First Defervescence While on IV Study Therapy (ME at TOC Analysis Set)
Time Frame: Time to first defervescence is defined as the time (in days) from the first dose of IV study therapy to first absence of fever, which is temperature ≤ 37.8 C in a 24-hour period.
Time to first defervescence while on IV study therapy in patients in the ME at TOC analysis set who have fever at study entry.
Time to first defervescence is defined as the time (in days) from the first dose of IV study therapy to first absence of fever, which is temperature ≤ 37.8 C in a 24-hour period.
Time to First Defervescence While on IV Study Therapy (Extended ME at TOC Analysis Set)
Time Frame: Time to first defervescence is defined as the time (in days) from the first dose of IV study therapy to first absence of fever, which is temperature ≤ 37.8 C in a 24-hour period.
Time to first defervescence while on IV study therapy in patients in the Extended ME at TOC analysis set who have fever at study entry.
Time to first defervescence is defined as the time (in days) from the first dose of IV study therapy to first absence of fever, which is temperature ≤ 37.8 C in a 24-hour period.
Time to First Defervescence While on IV Study Therapy (CE at TOC Analysis Set)
Time Frame: Time to first defervescence is defined as the time (in days) from the first dose of IV study therapy to first absence of fever, which is temperature ≤ 37.8 C in a 24-hour period.
Time to first defervescence while on IV study therapy in patients in the CE at TOC analysis set who have fever at study entry.
Time to first defervescence is defined as the time (in days) from the first dose of IV study therapy to first absence of fever, which is temperature ≤ 37.8 C in a 24-hour period.
Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT (IV) for Baseline Pathogen (mMITT Analysis Set)
Time Frame: At EOT IV visit. EOT (IV) visit is Within 24 hours after completion of the last infusion of IV study therapy and on/before the first dose for oral study therapy
Number of favorable per-pathogen microbiological responses at the EOT (IV) visit in the mMITT analysis set
At EOT IV visit. EOT (IV) visit is Within 24 hours after completion of the last infusion of IV study therapy and on/before the first dose for oral study therapy
Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at TOC for Baseline Pathogen (mMITT Analysis Set)
Time Frame: At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization
Number of favorable per-pathogen microbiological responses at the TOC visit in the mMITT analysis set
At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization
Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at LFU for Baseline Pathogen (mMITT Analysis Set)
Time Frame: At LFU visit. LFU visit is 45 to 52 days from Randomization
Number of favorable per-pathogen microbiological responses at the LFU visit in the mMITT analysis set
At LFU visit. LFU visit is 45 to 52 days from Randomization
Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT (IV) for Baseline Pathogen (Extended ME at EOT (IV) Analysis Set)
Time Frame: At EOT IV visit. EOT (IV) visit is Within 24 hours after completion of the last infusion of IV study therapy and on/before the first dose for oral study therapy
Number of favorable per-pathogen microbiological responses at the EOT (IV) visit in the Extended ME at EOT (IV) analysis set
At EOT IV visit. EOT (IV) visit is Within 24 hours after completion of the last infusion of IV study therapy and on/before the first dose for oral study therapy
Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at TOC for Baseline Pathogen (Extended ME at TOC Analysis Set)
Time Frame: At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization.
Number of favorable per-pathogen microbiological responses at the TOC visit in the Extended ME at TOC analysis set
At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization.
Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at LFU for Baseline Pathogen (Extended ME at LFU Analysis Set)
Time Frame: At LFU visit. LFU visit is 45 to 52 days from Randomization.
Number of favorable per-pathogen microbiological responses at the LFU visit in the Extended ME at LFU analysis set
At LFU visit. LFU visit is 45 to 52 days from Randomization.
Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT (IV) for Baseline Pathogen (ME at EOT (IV) Analysis Set)
Time Frame: At EOT (IV) visit. EOT (IV) visit is Within 24 hours after completion of the last infusion of IV study therapy and on/before the first dose for oral study therapy
Number of favorable per-pathogen microbiological responses at the EOT (IV) visit in the ME at EOT (IV) analysis set
At EOT (IV) visit. EOT (IV) visit is Within 24 hours after completion of the last infusion of IV study therapy and on/before the first dose for oral study therapy
Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at TOC for Baseline Pathogen (ME at TOC Analysis Set)
Time Frame: At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization.
Number of favorable per-pathogen microbiological responses at the TOC visit in the ME at TOC analysis set
At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization.
Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at LFU for Baseline Pathogen (ME at LFU Analysis Set)
Time Frame: At LFU visit. LFU visit is 45 to 52 days from Randomization.
Number of favorable per-pathogen microbiological responses at the LFU visit in the ME at LFU analysis set
At LFU visit. LFU visit is 45 to 52 days from Randomization.
Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT (IV) for Blood Only (mMITT Analysis Set)
Time Frame: At EOT IV visit. EOT (IV) visit is Within 24 hours after completion of the last infusion of IV study therapy and on/before the first dose for oral study therapy
Number of favorable per-pathogen microbiological responses at the EOT (IV) visit in the mMITT analysis set for blood only
At EOT IV visit. EOT (IV) visit is Within 24 hours after completion of the last infusion of IV study therapy and on/before the first dose for oral study therapy
Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at TOC for Blood Only (mMITT Analysis Set)
Time Frame: At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization
Number of favorable per-pathogen microbiological responses at the TOC visit in the mMITT analysis set for blood only
At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization
Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at LFU for Blood Only (mMITT Analysis Set)
Time Frame: At LFU visit. LFU visit is 45 to 52 days from Randomization
Number of favorable per-pathogen microbiological responses at the LFU visit in the mMITT analysis set for blood only
At LFU visit. LFU visit is 45 to 52 days from Randomization
Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT (IV) for Blood Only (Extended ME at EOT (IV) Analysis Set)
Time Frame: At EOT IV visit. EOT (IV) visit is Within 24 hours after completion of the last infusion of IV study therapy and on/before the first dose for oral study therapy
Number of favorable per-pathogen microbiological responses at the EOT (IV) visit in the Extended ME at EOT (IV) analysis set for blood only
At EOT IV visit. EOT (IV) visit is Within 24 hours after completion of the last infusion of IV study therapy and on/before the first dose for oral study therapy
Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at TOC for Blood Only (Extended ME at TOC Analysis Set)
Time Frame: At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization.
Number of favorable per-pathogen microbiological responses at the TOC visit in the Extended ME at TOC analysis set for blood only
At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization.
Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at LFU for Blood Only (Extended ME at LFU Analysis Set)
Time Frame: At LFU visit. LFU visit is 45 to 52 days from Randomization.
Number of favorable per-pathogen microbiological responses at the LFU visit in the Extended ME at LFU analysis set for blood only
At LFU visit. LFU visit is 45 to 52 days from Randomization.
Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at EOT (IV) for Blood Only (ME at EOT (IV) Analysis Set)
Time Frame: At EOT (IV) visit. EOT (IV) visit is Within 24 hours after completion of the last infusion of IV study therapy and on/before the first dose for oral study therapy
Number of favorable per-pathogen microbiological responses at the EOT (IV) visit in the ME at EOT (IV) analysis set for blood only
At EOT (IV) visit. EOT (IV) visit is Within 24 hours after completion of the last infusion of IV study therapy and on/before the first dose for oral study therapy
Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at TOC for Blood Only (ME at TOC Analysis Set)
Time Frame: At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization.
Number of favorable per-pathogen microbiological responses at the TOC visit in the ME at TOC analysis set for blood only
At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization.
Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at LFU for Blood Only (ME at LFU Analysis Set)
Time Frame: At LFU visit. LFU visit is 45 to 52 days from Randomization.
Number of favorable per-pathogen microbiological responses at the LFU visit in the ME at LFU analysis set for blood only
At LFU visit. LFU visit is 45 to 52 days from Randomization.
Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at TOC by CAZ AVI MIC for Baseline Pathogen (mMITT Analysis Set)
Time Frame: At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization
Per pathogen microbiological response at TOC by CAZ-AVI MIC for baseline pathogen in the mMITT analysis set
At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization
Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at TOC by CAZ AVI MIC for Baseline Pathogen (Extended ME at TOC Analysis Set)
Time Frame: At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization
Per pathogen microbiological response at TOC by CAZ-AVI MIC for baseline pathogen in the Extended ME at TOC analysis set
At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization
Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at TOC by CAZ AVI MIC for Baseline Pathogen (ME at TOC Analysis Set)
Time Frame: At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization
Per pathogen microbiological response at TOC by CAZ-AVI MIC for baseline pathogen in the ME at TOC analysis set
At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization
Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at TOC by Doripenem MIC for Baseline Pathogen (mMITT Analysis Set)
Time Frame: At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization
Per pathogen microbiological response at TOC by Doripenem MIC for baseline pathogen in the mMITT analysis set
At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization
Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at TOC by Doripenem MIC for Baseline Pathogen (Extended ME at TOC Analysis Set)
Time Frame: At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization
Per pathogen microbiological response at TOC by Doripenem MIC for baseline pathogen in the Extended ME at TOC analysis set
At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization
Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at TOC by Doripenem MIC for Baseline Pathogen (ME at TOC Analysis Set)
Time Frame: At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization
Per pathogen microbiological response at TOC by Doripenem MIC for baseline pathogen in the ME at TOC analysis set
At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization
Plasma Concentrations for Ceftazidime Within 15 Minutes Before/After Dose (PK Analysis Set)
Time Frame: within 15 minutes before/after dose
Blood samples were taken on Day 3 for ceftazidime (CAZ) and avibactam (AVI) plasma concentration.
within 15 minutes before/after dose
Plasma Concentrations for Ceftazidime Between 30 to 90 Minutes After Dose(PK Analysis Set)
Time Frame: Between 30 to 90 minutes after dose
Blood samples were taken on Day 3 for ceftazidime (CAZ) and avibactam (AVI) plasma concentration.
Between 30 to 90 minutes after dose
Plasma Concentrations for Ceftazidime Between 300 to 360 Minutes After Dose(PK Analysis Set)
Time Frame: Between 300 to 360 minutes after dose
Blood samples were taken on Day 3 for ceftazidime (CAZ) and avibactam (AVI) plasma concentration.
Between 300 to 360 minutes after dose
Plasma Concentrations for Avibactam Within 15 Minutes Before/After Dose (PK Analysis Set)
Time Frame: within 15 minutes before/after dose
Blood samples were taken on Day 3 for ceftazidime (CAZ) and avibactam (AVI) plasma concentration.
within 15 minutes before/after dose
Plasma Concentrations for Avibactam Between 30 to 90 Minutes After Dose(PK Analysis Set)
Time Frame: Between 30 to 90 minutes after dose
Blood samples were taken on Day 3 for ceftazidime (CAZ) and avibactam (AVI) plasma concentration.
Between 30 to 90 minutes after dose
Plasma Concentrations for Avibactam Between 300 to 360 Minutes After Dose(PK Analysis Set)
Time Frame: Between 300 to 360 minutes after dose
Blood samples were taken on Day 3 for ceftazidime (CAZ) and avibactam (AVI) plasma concentration.
Between 300 to 360 minutes after dose

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2012

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

August 1, 2014

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

August 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 27, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 8, 2012

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

May 10, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

September 6, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 31, 2017

Last Verified

August 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Complicated Urinary Tract Infection (cUTI) Including Acute Pyelonephritis

Clinical Trials on Ceftazidime - Avibactam ( CAZ-AVI)

3
Subscribe