Castration Compared to Castration Plus Metformin as First Line Treatment for Patients With Advanced Prostate Cancer

Phase II, Randomized, Placebo Controlled, Double Blind, Prospective Study of Castration Compared to Castration Plus Metformin as First Line Treatment for Patients With Advanced Prostate Cancer.

Prostate cancer is the most common non-cutaneous cancer in men. Patients with recurrent or metastatic prostate cancer are treated with androgen-deprivation therapy, often termed castration therapy. While the short and medium term benefits of castration are clear in relation to therapeutic efficacy in patients with prostate cancer, it is now appreciated that the resulting hypogonadism associated with castration is responsible for adverse consequences or metabolic syndrome that include increase in body mass index (BMI) and fat mass, hyperinsulinemia and insulin resistance, hyperlipidemia, reduced lean body mass (LBM) and muscle strength, osteoporosis, sexual dysfunction, poor quality of life and higher cardiovascular mortality. Lower testosterone levels in men independently predict the development of metabolic syndrome. Low testosterone levels in men are associated with insulin resistance and diabetes. Metformin is commonly prescribed for the treatment of type II diabetes because it lowers both glucose and insulin levels. Studies show preliminary evidence that metformin might have both antineoplastic and chemopreventative activity. Castration therapy decreases insulin sensitivity, adversely alters lipid profiles and results in weight gain, and it may be associated with a greater incidence of diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Little is known about the optimal strategy to mitigate the adverse metabolic effects of castration in men with prostate cancer. The rationale for using metformin in castrated men with advanced prostate cancer stems from the observation that castration therapy is associated with the metabolic syndrome, hyperinsulinemia and insulin resistance. Furthermore, reports that hyperinsulinemia stimulates insulin receptor expression on prostate cancer leading to tumor growth and development of castrate resistant prostate cancer suggest metformin through its activation of the AMPK-LKBI pathway reduces liver gluconeogenesis secondarily decreasing insulin levels may circumvent tumor growth and resistance to castration therapy. More importantly, evidence that metformin inhibits the mTOR pathway implicates an added therapeutic benefit as an anti-cancer agent.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

41

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78229
        • Cancer Therapy and Research Center University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

(Eligible subjects must meet one of the inclusion criteria 1-3 and all of items 4-6)

  1. Men with metastatic prostate cancer that require castration therapy with either using an LHRH analogue or surgical castration are eligible. Complete androgen blockade using anti-androgen therapy prior to castration or up to 4 weeks following castration therapy is permitted to prevent disease flare. Thereafter anti-androgen therapy may continue or be discontinued based on treating physicians preference.

    OR

  2. Any men with prostate cancer who are candidates for castration therapy despite no evidence of definite metastatic disease including patient with biochemical failure or 'rising PSA' are also permitted to enter study provided castration therapy is planned for a minimum of a year. Patients with biochemical failure prior to enrolment should have also have already received appropriate salvage therapy. Men with prostate cancer who have already started castration therapy are also permitted to enter study provided castration therapy was initiated within one month of study entry.

    OR

  3. Men with prostate cancer previously treated with castration therapy for management of localized prostate cancer in the adjuvant setting or in combination with radiation therapy are permitted to enter study provided they currently have known metastatic disease and have non-castrate testosterone levels (Testosterone > 50 ng/dL).
  4. An ECOG performance status of 0-2.
  5. Patients will need to have documentation of metastatic disease in bone and/or soft tissue, and a baseline PSA of ≥ 5 ng/ml. If patients have already had castration therapy, their baseline PSA value will be reflective of the value prior to castration. Patients with biochemical failures, with rising PSA (baseline PSA does not need to be ≥ 5 nglml to be eligible), without metastatic disease are also eligible if castration therapy is indicated for minimum of 7 months and for these patients any PSA value is permitted.
  6. Patients must have provided informed consent, be willing to have blood specimens taken, and exhibit no severe other medical or psychiatric problems.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with severe medical or psychiatric diseases are INELIGIBLE. (Patients with stable chronic diseases such as high cholesterol or hypertension ARE eligible.) Examples of problems that would make patients INELIGIBLE include severe heart failure, or hypoxia due to severe lung disease.
  2. Patients with clinical or biochemical evidence of renal failure or liver failure are INELIGIBLE. Creatinine and bilirubin needs to be less than or equal to 1.3~up per limit of normal (ULN), and ASTIALT less than or equal to 2.5 x ULN unless liver metastasis is present then up to 5 X ULN permitted).
  3. Patients already receiving metformin or anti-diabetic medications are INELIGIBLE.
  4. If any patient develops symptomatic diabetes requiring drug therapy, he must receive such a therapy, which may include metformin. This must be documented, and the patient will not continue on the study.
  5. Patients with important infections requiring antibiotics are INELIGIBLE, but patients who acquire minor infections while on the study may remain on the study.
  6. Alcohol abuse problems make patients INELIGIBLE. Patients need to be consuming less than or equal to 14 units of alcohol weekly.
  7. Patients with history or evidence of lactic acidosis or metabolic acidosis will be excluded.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Metabolic consequences including development of hyperinsulinemia and insulin resistance using metformin compared to placebo in men on castration therapy.
All eligible subjects will be randomized in a 1:l manner to receive a bottle containing sufficient 500mg tablets of placebo after castration, blinded to the patient and the study team.
Active Comparator: Metformin
Metabolic consequences including development of hyperinsulinemia and insulin resistance using metformin compared to placebo in men on castration therapy. In the rare case where a patient may not tolerate 500 mg three times a day, he may remain on the study taking only 500 mg twice a day.
All eligible subjects will be randomized in a 1:l manner to receive a bottle containing sufficient 500mg tablets of metformin after castration, blinded to the patient and the study team.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Metabolic Syndrome
Time Frame: Change from 0 weeks to 28 weeks
Compare both cohorts of castrated men (metformin vs. placebo) with regard to metabolic consequences of castration therapy:change in weight.
Change from 0 weeks to 28 weeks
Metabolic Syndrome Waist Circumference
Time Frame: Change from 12 to 28 weeks
Compare both cohorts of castrated men (metformin vs. placebo) with regard to metabolic consequences of castration therapy:change in waist circumference.
Change from 12 to 28 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
PSA Response
Time Frame: 28 weeks
Complete Response for PSA measure was defined as a PSA less than or equal to 4 ng/ml or undetectable value at 7 months.
28 weeks
Treatment Failure
Time Frame: 1 year
Progression time from randomization to the earliest disease progression defined as an increase of 20% or more as per RECIST criteria. Patients will not be removed from protocol treatment for PSA progression alone in the first 12 weeks on this study. Further rise in PSA even in the absence of deterioration of pre-existing lesions will constitute treatment failure. Adverse event leading to withdrawal related to metformin or placebo or castration treatment. Death from any cause. Patients unwillingness to continue. Patient's non-compliance with taking the study intervention - 50% or higher.
1 year
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
Time Frame: 1 year

The safety and tolerability of metformin with castration therapy as compared to castration therapy alone as measured by the number of subjects experiencing adverse events using CTCAE (common terminology criteria for adverse events) version 4 criteria. Grades are assigned to each adverse event where:

Grade 1 is mild symptoms Grade 2 is moderate symptoms Grade 3 is severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening symptoms Grade 4 is life-threatening consequences, where urgent intervention is indicated Grade 5 is death related to the adverse event

1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Devalingam Mahalingam, MD, PhD, University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 31, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 12, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

June 15, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 23, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 21, 2018

Last Verified

September 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Prostate Cancer

Clinical Trials on Placebo

3
Subscribe