Evaluating Short-term Effects of Computerized Brain Fitness Exercises in Adult Cochlear Implant and/or Hearing Aid Users

January 31, 2017 updated by: Aaron Newman

Evaluating Short-term Effects of Home-based Computerized Multi-domain Cognitive Training in Adult Cochlear Implant and/or Hearing Aid Users: A Prospective Randomized Intervention Study

In this study we are testing computer-based brain fitness exercises. The games are designed to improve people's cognitive abilities brain functions, like memory, concentration, and ability to do two things at once. We are testing whether this cognitive training brain exercises will improve understanding of spoken sentences speech comprehension in people who use cochlear implant and/or hearing aids. We predict that cognitive training will improve speech comprehension in cochlear implant and/or hearing aid users.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Aural rehabilitation is a life long process in spite of advanced innovative implant technology. Existing standard therapy is inadequate for some people, because even after years of surgery many implant users does not obtain significant benefits, like improved understanding of spoken sentences. In many cases it seems that the speech comprehension deficits are linked to particular cognitive functions in cochlear implant users, including memory and attention. In this study we will test whether a computer-based set of "cognitive fitness" or "brain training" games designed to improve memory and attention will help cochlear implant and hearing aid users to understand speech better.

Cochlear implant and hearing aid users will complete 10 weeks of computer-based cognitive training on their home computers. Half of participants will do this training immediately after being enrolled in the study; the other half will receive the training beginning 10 weeks after they are enrolled. Speech comprehension and cognitive abilities will be assessed at baseline, 10, 20 and 30 weeks in all participants.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

12

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Nova Scotia
      • Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada, B3H 4R2
        • NeuroCognitive Imaging Lab, Dalhousie University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult cochlear implant users, and/or people with moderate/severe hearing loss using bilateral hearing aids, aged 19 or above
  • Access to an internet-connect device that supports flash, and basic computer skills
  • Medically stable patients

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with epilepsy, severe visual and cognitive difficulties, chronic fatigue syndrome, and serious co-morbid conditions which could be exacerbated by the computer training games will be excluded for safety reasons.
  • Patients who are unlikely to adhere to the intervention due to dementia, Parkinson's disease, Parkinson-plus syndrome, movement disorders or disability that would impair the person's ability to perform the training (e.g., problems with attention, alertness, or learning disorders)
  • Participants who cannot speak English (since study materials are only in English), or unable to give consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Immediate cognitive fitness training
After the initial baseline evaluation, the immediate treatment group participants will receive individualized multi-domain cognitive training and standard of care. Cognitive training includes at least 1/2 hour per session, 3 days per week, throughout the 10 week interval. After 10 weeks of cognitive fitness training, participants in this group will switch to a 20 week "no intervention" period where they receive only standard of care treatment.

Computer-based training of basic cognitive functions. It has activities under two headings,

  1. General training applications
  2. Memory training applications

Each individual session in both groups will include playing specific computer games for at least 1/2 hour a day, 3 days per week, throughout the 10 week interval.

Other: Delayed cognitive fitness training
After the initial baseline evaluation, the delayed cognitive fitness training group participants will receive only standard of care for 10 weeks ("no intervention" period). Starting in week 11, participants in this arm will receive individualized multi-domain cognitive training and standard of care. Cognitive training includes at least 1/2 hour per session, 3 days per week, throughout the 10 week interval. After 10 weeks of cognitive fitness training, participants will go for another 10 weeks with only standard of care treatment.

Computer-based training of basic cognitive functions. It has activities under two headings,

  1. General training applications
  2. Memory training applications

Each individual session in both groups will include playing specific computer games for at least 1/2 hour a day, 3 days per week, throughout the 10 week interval.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
AzBio Sentence test - change in score from baseline to post-training
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 10, 20 and 30
Sentences are played along with masking noise (multi-talker babble). Participants must repeat each sentence as they heard it. Accuracy in repeating the sentences is the outcome measure.
Baseline, Weeks 10, 20 and 30

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from Baseline in CANTABeclipse for clinical trials
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 10, 20 and 30
It is a method of assessing the brain-functions of a person using computerized non-linguistic tests by touch screen technology making it rapid and safe. It has been widely used globally to assess brain-functions in more than 100 disorders. More than 700 articles have been published using CANTABeclipse by over 500 academic institutions or industry researchers in 60 different countries. Tasks are performed by touch screen technology. It assesses brain-functions such as planning, problem solving, working memory etc.
Baseline, Weeks 10, 20 and 30
Change from Baseline in Speech Spatial Qualities questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 10, 20 and 30
The Spatial Speech Qualities of Hearing scale questionnaire (SSQ; Gatehouse & Noble, 2004) is used to assess the self reported hearing disabilities across several domains such as hearing speech in challenging contexts and to the directional, distance and movement components of spatial hearing.
Baseline, Weeks 10, 20 and 30
Change from Baseline in CogniFit NeuroPsychological Assessment
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 10, 20 and 30
The CogniFit Neuropsychological assessment is a multi domain cognitive task. It measures 18 cognitive abilities such as visuospatial working memory, visuospatial learning, focused attention, updating, monitoring etc. (Haimov et al., 2008; Peretz et al., 2011b; Shatil et al., 2010; Verghese et al., 2010)
Baseline, Weeks 10, 20 and 30
Adherence record
Time Frame: Upto 30 weeks
Access usage data from CogniFit website will be recorded. Recording includes time spent on each session (start and end time), number of games played during each session
Upto 30 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Aaron Newman, PhD, Dalhousie University, Canada
  • Principal Investigator: Christoph Gradmann, University of Oslo

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 14, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 20, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

November 26, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 1, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 31, 2017

Last Verified

January 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Deafness

Clinical Trials on Cognitive fitness training

3
Subscribe