Effects on Organ Damage and Surgical Outcome of a New Cardiopulmonary Pass System (EVADO) (EVADO)

June 20, 2023 updated by: IRCCS San Raffaele Roma

A New Cardiopulmonary By-pass System That Minimizes Haemodilution, Hemolysis and Systemic Inflammation. Effects on Organ Damage and Surgical Outcome

The primary purpose of this study is to assess the effects of the use of EVADO with respect to a conventional cardio-pulmonary bypass (CBP) system on surgical morbidity and mortality. As secondary aim this study wants to conduct appropriate laboratory investigations in order to detect the major biological mechanisms potentially responsible for the beneficial effects of the EVADO system on the coagulation cascade and inflammatory activation.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

The present study is designed as a prospective, multicentre, randomized, open label, controlled, 2-arm parallel group, superiority trial.

Participating centres are selected based on previous experience with the use of the EVADO system.

Patients elected to open heart surgery for a variety of cardiac conditions related to coronary, valvular or aortic disease or their combination in the participating centers will be screened.

This study as secondary aim wants to confirm the results of earlier investigation by a multicentre trial conducted on a larger population of patients undergoing a wide spectrum of open heart cardiac operations and either assess a number of cost-efficacy-efficiency indicators.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

300

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bari, Italy
        • Anthea Hospital
      • Cotignola, Italy, 48010
        • Maria Cecilia Hospital
      • Lecce, Italy
        • Città di Lecce Hospital
      • Rapallo, Italy
        • ICLAS Rapallo

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

patients elected to undergo open heart surgery for a variety of cardiac conditions related to coronary, valvular or aortic disease or their combination and fulfilling the following additional criteria:

  • Written informed consent
  • Age 18-85 years

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe renal or liver failure
  • Uncompensated diabetes
  • Autoimmune disease requiring immunosuppressant therapy
  • Coagulation disorders
  • Emergent or redo surgery

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: EVADO

The E.V.A.D.O. system is made of the following components:

  • The ADMIRAL oxygenator, that requires low priming volumes (, has a limited contact surface and contains an accessory independent cardiotomy reservoir, allowing separation of pericardial suction blood.
  • The HARMONY Smart Suction System, which allows automatic regulation of a pumpless extracavity blood sucker, whose rates and pressures depend on whether suction is required for blood/air surfaces (skimming), or for fluids (pooled).
  • Paediatric circuits with 3/8" tubing for both arterial and venous lines.
EVADO (Extracorporeal Vacuum-Assisted Device Optimized) device enables separation of cardiotomy suction blood, which is stored in a separate reservoir, and, if re-infusion into the CPB circuit is required, this is performed only after selective filtering and by cell saver procedures. Moreover, by using a vacuum-assisted system for blood aspiration, EVADO allows complete elimination of roller pumps, therefore reducing the extent of mechanical cellular trauma. EVADO contains a phosphorylcholine-coated oxygenator, that confers superior biocompatibility. Finally, by requiring relatively limited priming volumes, it allows reducing haemodilution.
Active Comparator: Conventional CPB
conventional cardiopulmonary by-pass (CPB) system
conventional miniature cardiopulmonary bypass technique

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
composite of in-hospital mortality and clinical and outcome parameters recorded in the post-operative period
Time Frame: participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 weeks
The primary efficacy endpoint is the composite of in-hospital mortality, defined as death of any cause occurring before hospital discharge, myocardial infarction, stroke; severe renal failure; severe liver failure; severe cardio-respiratory failure; multiorgan failure; need for left ventricular support device; need for dialysis or ultrafiltration: post-operative bleeding; atrial fibrillation.
participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Individual components of the primary end-point
Time Frame: participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 weeks
outcome parameters recorded in the postoperative period: Myocardial infarction
participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 weeks
Individual components of the primary end-point
Time Frame: participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 weeks

outcome parameters recorded in the postoperative period:

Stroke

participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 weeks
Individual components of the primary end-point
Time Frame: participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 weeks

outcome parameters recorded in the postoperative period:

Severe renal failure (greater than 2-fold increase in creatinine levels)

participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 weeks
Individual components of the primary end-point
Time Frame: participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 weeks

outcome parameters recorded in the postoperative period:

Multiorgan failure (MOF)

participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 weeks
Individual components of the primary end-point
Time Frame: participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 weeks

outcome parameters recorded in the postoperative period:

Need for left ventricular support device (IABCP or similar)

participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 weeks
Individual components of the primary end-point
Time Frame: participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 weeks

outcome parameters recorded in the postoperative period:

Need for dialysis or ultrafiltration

participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 weeks
Individual components of the primary end-point
Time Frame: participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 weeks

outcome parameters recorded in the postoperative period:

Postoperative bleeding

participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 weeks
Individual components of the primary end-point
Time Frame: participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 weeks

outcome parameters recorded in the postoperative period:

Atrial fibrillation

participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 weeks
Individual components of the primary end-point
Time Frame: participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 weeks

outcome parameters recorded in the postoperative period:

Severe liver failure (greater than 2-fold increase in AST (aspartate aminotransferase), ALT (alanine aminotransferase) and y-GT (y-glutamyltransferase) levels)

participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 weeks
Individual components of the primary end-point
Time Frame: participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 weeks

outcome parameters recorded in the postoperative period:

Severe cardio-respiratory failure

participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Other pre-specified outcome measures
Time Frame: participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 weeks
• Total duration of hospital admission [Time Frame: participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 weeks] [Designated as safety issue: Yes]
participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 weeks
Other pre-specified outcome measures
Time Frame: participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 weeks
• Duration of ICU stay
participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 weeks
Other pre-specified outcome measures
Time Frame: participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 weeks
• Time to extubation
participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 weeks
Other pre-specified outcome measures
Time Frame: participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 weeks
• Total postoperative blood loss and blood transfusion volume
participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 weeks
Other pre-specified outcome measures
Time Frame: participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 weeks
• Total hospitalization costs
participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 weeks
Other pre-specified outcome measures
Time Frame: participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 weeks
• Cost-efficiency assessment
participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Giuseppe Nasso, MD, IRCCS San Raffaele Pisana

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 26, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 4, 2013

First Posted (Estimated)

March 6, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 22, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 20, 2023

Last Verified

June 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • GR-2009-1591573

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe