- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01865682
Effect of Ankle-foot Orthoses Trim Line Modifications on Ankle and Knee Motion and Force.
October 5, 2017 updated by: Dana Craig, Southern California Institute for Research and Education
Effects of Varying Trim Lines of Solid Ankle-foot Orthoses on Ankle and Knee Kinematics and Kinetics During Stance Phase.
The purpose of this study is to quantify changes in ankle and knee motion and force resulting from five progressive modifications to the anterior-posterior trim lines of thermoformed ankle-foot orthoses (AFO).
It is hypothesized that the AFO with the most anterior trim line will prevent the most plantar flexion during loading response (the first 10% of the gait cycle)and prevent the most dorsiflexion at terminal stance (from 30 to 50% of the gait cycle) as compared to the non-device condition.
This will be evidenced by the sagittal plane ankle motion and ground reaction force magnitude and location during loading response and terminal stance.
Additionally, the angular velocity of knee flexion will increase during these same periods.
By contrast, as the trim lines are moved more posterior this will result in lowering the effective stiffness of the device which will result in progressive increases in dorsiflexion and allow increasing amounts of knee flexion during terminal stance.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Actual)
10
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
California
-
Long Beach, California, United States, 90822
- VA Long Beach Healthcare System
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 40 years (Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Sampling Method
Non-Probability Sample
Study Population
This study seeks to recruit younger, healthy (non-pathological) individuals over 18 years of age.
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Participants must have no known pathology that would affect their ambulatory ability.
- Age greater than or equal to 18 years, but less than 40 years.
- Ability to tolerate walking for a minimum of 100 yards over the course of a three and a half hour time period.
- No current skin breakdown or sores on either lower extremity.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Use of ambulatory aids such as canes or crutches.
- Any medical or psychological condition that could jeopardize the subject's participation and compliance with the study protocol.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Case-Only
- Time Perspectives: Prospective
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
---|---|
Sagittal plane ankle angle.
Time Frame: Six months
|
Six months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
---|---|
Sagittal plane knee angle.
Time Frame: Six months
|
Six months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Dana D. Craig, MA, VA Long Beach Healthcare System
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Hsu, J., Michael, J., Fisk, J. (2008) AAOS Atlas of Orthoses and Assistive Devices. Mosby Inc., Elsevier, Inc. Pennsylvania
- Lusardi, M. and Nielsen, C.(2007) Orthotics and Prosthetics in Rehabilitation. Elsevier, Inc. Missouri
- White H, Jenkins J, Neace WP, Tylkowski C, Walker J. Clinically prescribed orthoses demonstrate an increase in velocity of gait in children with cerebral palsy: a retrospective study. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2002 Apr;44(4):227-32. doi: 10.1017/s0012162201001992.
- Jagadamma KC, Owen E, Coutts FJ, Herman J, Yirrell J, Mercer TH, Van Der Linden ML. The effects of tuning an ankle-foot orthosis footwear combination on kinematics and kinetics of the knee joint of an adult with hemiplegia. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2010 Sep;34(3):270-6. doi: 10.3109/03093646.2010.503225.
- Radtka SA, Skinner SR, Johanson ME. A comparison of gait with solid and hinged ankle-foot orthoses in children with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy. Gait Posture. 2005 Apr;21(3):303-10. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2004.03.004.
- Desloovere K, Molenaers G, Van Gestel L, Huenaerts C, Van Campenhout A, Callewaert B, Van de Walle P, Seyler J. How can push-off be preserved during use of an ankle foot orthosis in children with hemiplegia? A prospective controlled study. Gait Posture. 2006 Oct;24(2):142-51. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.08.003. Epub 2006 Aug 24.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
December 1, 2012
Primary Completion (Actual)
March 1, 2015
Study Completion (Actual)
June 1, 2017
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
May 28, 2013
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
May 28, 2013
First Posted (Estimate)
May 31, 2013
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
October 6, 2017
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
October 5, 2017
Last Verified
October 1, 2017
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- VALB-1215
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Lower Extremity Biomechanics
-
St. Pölten University of Applied SciencesMedical University of Vienna; University of Vienna; Danube University KremsCompletedPediatric Obesity | Lower Extremity BiomechanicsAustria
-
St. Pölten University of Applied SciencesKarl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences; Danube University Krems; Orthopedic...UnknownKnee Osteoarthritis | Physiotherapy | Lower Extremity BiomechanicsAustria
-
Drexel UniversityAmerican College of Sports MedicineCompletedKinematics | Electromyography | Wheelchair | Upper Extremity | Biomechanics | Water SportsUnited States
-
University of Texas at AustinCompletedUpper Extremity Dysfunction | Lower Extremity ProblemUnited States
-
3MWithdrawnLower Extremity Diabetic Leg Wounds | Lower Extremity Venous Leg Wounds | Lower Extremity Mixed Aetiology Leg WoundsUnited Kingdom
-
Brigham and Women's HospitalEnrolling by invitationLower Extremity Amputation | Trans-Tibial Amputation | Traumatic Lower Extremity Amputation | Agonist-Antagonist Myoneural InterfaceUnited States
-
Istituto Auxologico ItalianoASST Gaetano Pini-CTORecruiting
-
VA Office of Research and DevelopmentRecruiting
-
University Hospital, AngersUnknownAmputation | Lower Extremity
-
Udayana UniversityRecruitingLower Extremity SurgeryIndonesia