Inhaled Steroids at Discharge After Emergency Department Visits for Children With Uncontrolled Asthma

May 15, 2020 updated by: Rhode Island Hospital

Optimizing Discharge After Emergency Department Visits for Children With Uncontrolled Asthma

Many children have asthma and this causes problems with their health. A lot of children with uncontrolled asthma use emergency departments for asthma care, and so this is an ideal place for an intervention for these children. One intervention is prescribing inhaled steroids to children with uncontrolled asthma, but currently this is rarely done in the emergency department. Inhaled steroids have been shown to be good at making children better long-term when they have uncontrolled asthma.

This study identifies children in the emergency department with uncontrolled asthma using a tool called the Pediatric Asthma Control and Communication Instrument (PACCI). If children meet criteria for uncontrolled asthma they will be randomly assigned to either: 1) routine asthma care which includes close follow up with their doctor or 2) prescribing of an inhaled corticosteroid from the emergency department. The investigators hypothesize that children who are prescribed inhaled steroids for uncontrolled asthma from the emergency department will have better 6 month asthma control than children who receive routine asthma care.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Detailed Description

Specific aim 1 - An ED-based RCT to determine if ICS prescription in children identified using the PACCI as having uncontrolled asthma results in less asthma morbidity compared to routine asthma care. We hypothesize that children receiving ICS prescriptions will have fewer unscheduled health care use for asthma exacerbations (doctor's office visits, ED visits, or hospitalizations), and greater quality of life.

Specific aim 2 - Thematic analysis of interviews with parents who are adherent versus non-adherent with ICS prescription filling and use to determine the factors associated with adherence. We hypothesize that factors will include: 1) Parent beliefs about the chronic versus episodic nature of asthma, 2) Parent's knowledge of benefits and risks of ICS, and 3) Provision and use of an asthma action plan.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

118

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Rhode Island
      • Providence, Rhode Island, United States, 02906
        • Rhode Island Hospital / Hasbro Children's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

3 years to 12 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 3 - 12 years of age
  • child has asthma diagnosed by a doctor based on parental/caregiver report
  • child is not already properly using an ICS or being discharged with an ICS

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The child has previously participated in this study
  • The child has major co-morbid disease of the heart or lungs (examples include cystic fibrosis, heart disease, muscular dystrophy and cerebral palsy with immobility. It does not include allergic rhinitis or a history of respiratory infections such as pneumonia or bronchiolitis.
  • The child's parents/caregivers do not speak English
  • The child is not going to be discharged from the emergency department (e.g. hospitalization)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Inhaled corticosteroid (fluticasone)
Child receives: 1) standardized asthma discharge instructions, and the intervention which is 2) inhaled corticosteroid prescription with accompanying instructions.
During discharge, the study MD/nurse informs the family that the child has been randomized to the inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) group, and will be prescribed fluticasone to help control the asthma. The families preferred pharmacy is determined and a prescription for a fluticasone multi-dose inhaler (MDI) provided. Dosing follows the NHLBI asthma guidelines for low dose ICS in this age group (88 mcg administered twice per day, dispense one inhaler, 3 refills). In addition to standard asthma discharge instructions, the family receives specific instructions for ICS administration, possible side effects of medication use, and distinction between controller and quick-relief rescue medications. Parents are instructed to discuss with their primary care provider the length of ICS use.
Other Names:
  • inhaled corticosteroid
Study MD or nurse provides asthma discharge instructions using a standardized checklist. The topics covered include 1) description of asthma manifestations related to current visit, 2) signs of respiratory distress family should be looking for, 3) instructions to follow up with the child's primary care provider within one week, 4) provision and review of an asthma action plan, 5) provision of a spacer device to be used with inhalers (if family does not already possess), and 6) smoking cessation advice. (if indicated)
Placebo Comparator: Routine Asthma Care
Child receives: 1) Standard Asthma Discharge Instructions. No intervention in this arm (placebo controlled)
Study MD or nurse provides asthma discharge instructions using a standardized checklist. The topics covered include 1) description of asthma manifestations related to current visit, 2) signs of respiratory distress family should be looking for, 3) instructions to follow up with the child's primary care provider within one week, 4) provision and review of an asthma action plan, 5) provision of a spacer device to be used with inhalers (if family does not already possess), and 6) smoking cessation advice. (if indicated)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality-of-life Using the Integrated Therapeutics Group Child Asthma Short Form
Time Frame: 6 months
The Integrated Therapeutics Group Child Asthma Short Form (ITG-CASF) has been validated in the ED setting for children 2 to 17 years old, is reliable (Cronbach's α =0.70), and can be administered by telephone. Each item is rated on a 5-point scale. Each response is scaled as a percentage of the maximum response, and the total score is the maximum percentage based on the number of questions answered. The scores range from 0 (minimum) - 100 (maximum), with higher scores reflecting better quality of life. The change in ITG-CASF scores for children with improved overall clinical status are 10 points higher than when children have not improved.
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
ED Visits for Asthma
Time Frame: 6 months
Emergency department visits for asthma over a 6 month period by parent report.
6 months
Primary Care Visits for Well Checks
Time Frame: 6 months
Primary care visits well checks over a 6 month period by parent report.
6 months
Hospitalizations for Asthma
Time Frame: 6 months
Hospitalizations for asthma over a 6 month period by parent report.
6 months
Unscheduled Primary Care Visits
Time Frame: 6 months
Unscheduled primary care visits for asthma over a 6 month period by parent report.
6 months
Oral Steroid Courses
Time Frame: 6 months
Oral steroid courses over a 6 month period by parent report.
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Aris C Garro, MD, MPH, Brown University and Rhode Island Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 17, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 18, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

June 19, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 18, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 15, 2020

Last Verified

April 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Availability on request

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data currently available on request

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Requests will be reviewed by the study investigators for appropriateness

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • ICF

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Asthma

Clinical Trials on fluticasone

3
Subscribe