Efficacy of 2-Liter Mixed Preparation With Bisacodyl Plus Polyethylene Glycol and 4-Liter Polyethylene Glycol for Colon Cleansing in Patients With Prior History of Colorectal Resection (PEGOP)

June 15, 2014 updated by: Alessandro Mussetto, Ospedale Santa Maria delle Croci

Phase 4 Study of Comparison of 2-Liter Mixed Preparation With Bisacodyl Plus Polyethylene Glycol and 4-Liter Polyethylene Glycol for Colon Cleansing in Patients With Prior History of Colorectal Resection. A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

Studies that have investigated different bowel preparations in patients with history of colorectal surgery are surprisingly lacking.Therefore, which is the best colon preparation in this subgroup of patients is still unknown. Polyethylene glycol (PEG)-based solutions are the most popular and safest bowel preparation regimens, however the 4-Liter volume is often poorly tolerated. More recently, it has been shown that the use of a low volume preparation (2-Liter PEG solution with the adjunct of a laxative, bisacodyl) achieves comparable bowel cleanliness rates to 4-Liter PEG in general population.The primary aim will be to compare the efficacy of 2-L mixed preparation (bisacodyl plus PEG) to 4-L PEG preparation.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

116

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • RA
      • Ravenna, RA, Italy, 48100
        • Alessandro Mussetto
      • Ravenna, RA, Italy, 48100
        • Ospedale S.Maria delle Croci

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Outpatients
  2. ≥18 yrs old,
  3. Prior history of colorectal resection due to colo-rectal cancer, referred for surveillance colonoscopy

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Inpatients
  2. Emergency Colonoscopy
  3. Comorbidities: Congestive heart failure, history of kidney disease, history of solid organ transplant
  4. Pregnant and/or lactating women

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: bisacodyl plus 2-Liter Polyethylene glycol
Patients randomized to the low-volume arm, will be invited to consume 2 sachets of Lovol-esse (Polyethylene glycol) in one liter of water at 8:00 PM the evening before the colonoscopy and 2 sachets in one liter of water 4 hours before their scheduled colonoscopy appointment; furthermore, the patients will be instructed to take three 5-mg tablets of bisacodyl the day before the procedure, at 5:00 PM.
Active Comparator: 4-Liter Polyethylene glycol
Patients assigned to the high-volume arm will be invited to consume 2 envelopes of Selg-esse 1000 (polyethylene glycol) in 2 litres of water and drink the resulting solution in about 2-3 hours starting at 6:00 PM the evening before the colonoscopy; the day of the procedure, starting 5 hours before the procedure, the patients will be invited to complete the preparation with 2 others envelopes of Selg-esse 1000 (polyethylene glycol) dissolved in 2 litres of water.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
quality of bowel preparation rated according to a modified Ottawa bowel preparation scale
Time Frame: about 2 weeks after the randomization
about 2 weeks after the randomization

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Tolerability to the preparation (specific questionaire)
Time Frame: participants will be followed from the randomization until the time of colonoscopy, about 2 weeks after the randomization

Tolerability will be assessed by using a questionnaire completed by the patients on arrival at the endoscopy unit before colonoscopy.

The patient acceptance/satisfaction to bowel preparation will be evaluated with the following question:

What is the extent of your disturbance due to bowel preparation? Severe (the bowel preparation assumption was stopped and not completed)(score 3) Moderate (bowel preparation assumption was stopped several times because of side effects but finally completed)(score 2) Mild (bowel preparation was completed without pauses but with some mild side effects)(score 1) No side effects (score 0)

participants will be followed from the randomization until the time of colonoscopy, about 2 weeks after the randomization
safety (adverse event rate)
Time Frame: participants will be followed from the randomization until the time of colonoscopy, about 2 weeks after the randomization
Safety will be evaluated through reported adverse events, physical examination and vital signs
participants will be followed from the randomization until the time of colonoscopy, about 2 weeks after the randomization
Lesion detection (type and lesion detection rate/patient)
Time Frame: about 2 weeks from the randomization
Polyps will be categorized as non-neoplastic or neoplastic (ie, adenomatous). Adenoma will be diagnosed by pathological evaluation of retrieved polyps. Adenomas will be considered advanced when they will be ≥10 mm in size, with villous architecture, high-grade dysplasia or intramucosal carcinoma (pTis), or 3 or more adenomas will be found. Invasive cancer will be considered when malignant cells will be observed beyond the muscularis mucosa. Size of adenoma will be obtained from both the colonoscopist's assessment and the pathology report, with the larger measurement being used in the analyses. Site of adenoma will be recorded by the colonoscopist at the time of polypectomy. Lesions at or proximal to the splenic flexure will be termed right-sided lesions, those distal to the splenic flexure as left-sided, taking into account the type of colorectal surgical resection underwent by the patient. The adenoma detection rate will be defined as the proportion of colonoscopies with adenomas.
about 2 weeks from the randomization

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 11, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 25, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

June 26, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

June 17, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 15, 2014

Last Verified

June 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Intestinal Cancer

Clinical Trials on Bisacodyl

3
Subscribe