Virtual Advisors for Physical Activity Promotion in Underserved Communities (COMPASS2)

October 19, 2020 updated by: Abby C King, Stanford University
The primary aim of this research study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a computer-based 'virtual lay advisor' intervention relative to a proven human lay advisor/promotore intervention to promote regular walking among inactive midlife and older Latino adults. The primary analysis is a non-inferiority analysis comparing these two interventions.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

COMPASS (Computerized Physical Activity Support for Seniors) was a single-blind, cluster-randomized noninferiority parallel trial conducted by investigators from Stanford University School of Medicine and Northeastern University. Participants were recruited from community centers in Santa Clara and San Mateo Counties, CA which had been randomized in pairs based on locale to either Virtual or Human advisors. Allocation concealment was accomplished by utilizing staff not directly involved in study enrollment, assessment, or intervention procedures. Both arms received a similar 12-month behavioral PA instruction/support program at their designated community center based on Active Choices-an individually-tailored PA intervention with demonstrated effectiveness and translatability across diverse adult populations. The primary outcome was change in 12-month weekly walking minutes.

In addition to the major trial and primary investigation described above, an exploratory Substudy was conducted separately to begin to evaluate the initial "proof of concept" of a food literacy curriculum in 2 separate community centers that were not part of the major trial. This first-generation exploratory Substudy is not part of the major trial and therefore is not included in this protocol and trial description.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

245

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Palo Alto, California, United States, 94304
        • Stanford Prevention Research Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Spanish or English-speaking primarily Latino men or women
  • Aged greater than or equal to 50 years
  • No plans to move within the next year
  • Inactive (have not engaged in moderate-intensity or more vigorous physical activity
  • > 3 days per week for at least 20 min per day) within last 6 months
  • Able to participate in study intervention and assessments at their local neighborhood senior center

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Any medical condition or disorder that would limit participation in moderate intensity physical activity (such as sustained walking), including life-threatening disorders, myocardial ischemia, major functional disabilities in the orthopedic area, or inability to complete baseline assessments for any reason (including psychological, cognitive);
  2. Not stable on their medications, including hormone replacement therapy, for ≥ 3 months (given that changes in medications can create additional stress and burden over and above attempts to change lifestyle behaviors);
  3. Inability to complete a face-to-face training session with a computer-based program

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Promotora for physical activity
Weekly sessions with a volunteer promotora at a community center. A promotora is a trained, lay health worker. The promotora will provide guidance, advice and support to participants to encourage them to be more physically active.
A promotora is a trained, lay health worker. Promotoras will be trained and supervised to provide advice, support and guidance to people to encourage them to be more physically active. They work with people face to face and by telephone to offer support and advice.
Experimental: Carmen system
Weekly sessions with the virtual advisor accessed through a computer located at a community center. Carmen is the virtual advisor and will provide guidance, advice and support to participants to encourage them to be more physically active.
The virtual advisor is named Carmen. She is an animated, computer-generated figure that speaks to participants and gives advice and support for physical activity.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Total Weekly Walking Minutes From Baseline to 12 Months
Time Frame: baseline, 12 months
Total weekly walking minutes as measured by self-report (CHAMPS Physical Activity Questionnaire)
baseline, 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Sedentary Behavior From Baseline to 12 Months
Time Frame: baseline, 12 months
Self-reported time spent in the following activities: watching television, computer use, reading, socializing, transport and hobbies, and a summary measure (total sedentary time).
baseline, 12 months
Change in Moderate to Vigorous Physical Activity From Baseline to 12 Months
Time Frame: baseline, 12 months
moderate to vigorous intensity physical activity as measured by self-report questionnaire
baseline, 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Abby C King, PhD, Stanford University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 30, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

April 30, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 2, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 8, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

April 11, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 10, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 19, 2020

Last Verified

October 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • R01HL116448 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sedentary Lifestyle

Clinical Trials on Promotora for physical activity

3
Subscribe