Respiratory Load Magnitude Estimation in PD

September 16, 2016 updated by: University of Florida

Magnitude Estimation of Respiratory Resistive Load in Parkinson's Disease

The purpose of this study is to determine whether people with Parkinson's disease (PD) experience reduced perception of respiratory resistive loads versus healthy adults in the same age group. Further, the study will determine whether people with PD and trouble swallowing experience even more reduction of their perception of a respiratory resistive load.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Experimental design and procedures: This prospective experimental study will be completed in one study visit taking between 1 and 3 hours. Verbal and written informed consent will be obtained by qualified members of the investigative team. Following informed consent, all participants will complete a health history questionnaire to assess inclusion/exclusion criteria. For patients with PD the consenting investigator will review the electronic medical record to ensure inclusion/exclusion criteria are met.

The experimental protocol will consist of 1.) Baseline pulmonary function measures, 2.) Baseline measures of depression and apathy, 3.) Presentation of resistive inspiratory loads via respiratory equipment, and 4.) Rating the perceived magnitude of respiratory sensations as measured on a modified Borg scale (ranging from 6 - no breathing difficulty - to 20 - maximal difficulty). For patients with PD only, the investigators will also review results of the rehabilitation barium swallow study performed as part of their standard clinical care.

Baseline Pulmonary function measures: The forced expired volume in the first second (FEV1) of a forced vital capacity (FVC) exhalation will be measured for each participant. Maximum inspiratory pressure (PiMax) will be measured with a manometer. The PiMax test will be repeated until 3 measurements within 10% variation are obtained, with at least 1 minute rest between trials.

Baseline depression and apathy: There is a significant impact for emotion on respiratory perceptual ratings. As such, we will measure baseline depression and apathy scores using 2 validated scales, the Beck Depression Index (BDI) and Marin Apathy Index (MAI). These are not outcome measures, but will be used to determine exclusion criteria.

Should depression (17 or greater on BDI) be detected in a participant, that participant will be provided with contact information for the University of Florida (UF) psychiatry and psychology clinic and encouraged to seek further evaluation. In the case severe depression is detected (31 or greater on BDI) the participant will not continue with the study, and will be provided with contact information for the UF psychiatry and psychology clinic and encouraged to seek further evaluation.

Inspiratory resistive load presentation:

The participant will be seated in a chair, separated from the investigator and experimental apparatus. The participant will be instructed to "relax and breathe" through a facemask connected to a non-rebreathing valve in line with a differential pressure transducer. The inspiratory port of the valve will be connected to the resistive loading manifold. The manifold consists of 5 differential resistors ranging from 5 - 40 centimeters/water (cmH2O) of resistive pressure, separated by stoppered ports, as well as a no load condition. The load is applied by removing the stop for an entire inspiratory breath, and then replacing the port to continue resting tidal breathing. The pressure transducer will provide measures of mouth pressure and airflow, which will be digitized and recorded to a desk top computer using LabChart software. Following each loaded breath, the participant will provide an estimate of the perceived difficulty of breathing using a modified Borg scale.

Participants will be familiarized with the loads in a practice session prior to initiating the experimental protocol. During the experimental session, participants will listen to music of their choice in order to mask experimental sounds. The resistive loads will be applied in a randomized block design, with each loaded breath separated by at least three unloaded breaths. Two blocks will be completed with each load presented between 3 and 5 times within each block. Therefore, there will be a total of between 15 and 25 loaded breaths (3-5 loads x 5 presentations) per block. Participants will be instructed that when they see a small light flash briefly on the table in front of them (which they will be familiarized with prior to beginning the experiment) a resistive load will be applied to the next breath. Following the loaded breath, the participant will be asked to estimate the perceived difficulty of breathing on the Borg scale.

Rehabilitation barium swallow study: Participants with PD who are referred for a rehabilitation barium swallowing evaluation will be recruited for this study. Therefore, the swallowing evaluation is part of the normal clinical care of the patients and may vary based on the clinical necessity as judged by the treating speech-language pathologist. Generally, the standard clinical evaluation protocol consists of multiple swallows of thin liquid barium, pudding-thick barium, and a cracker or cookie coated with barium. For the purposes of this study, the researchers will review the most recently recorded swallow study and identify the worst observed penetration-aspiration (PA) score (ranging from 1-8, where 1 is no penetration or aspiration, and 8 is silent aspiration). The PA score will be recorded in order to determine whether the participant has trouble swallowing (scores of 3-8) or not (scores of 1 and 2).

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Florida
      • Gainesville, Florida, United States, 32611
        • University of Florida Center for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

45 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

This study will include 2 participant groups: those with Parkinson's disease, and healthy age- matched control participants. We will recruit 40 healthy older adults and 40 individuals with PD to participate. We will recruit all participants with PD from those referred for swallowing evaluation by the speech-language pathology service at the University of Florida (UF) Center for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration (CMDNR). Healthy participants will be recruited via the UF Institutional Review Board's (IRBs) Healthstreet program, and local/campus advertisements.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Between the ages of 45 and 85
  • Ability to provide informed consent
  • Patient group: Diagnosis of PD, Hoehn and Yahr stages II - IV, by a UF Movement Disorders fellowship trained neurologist having completed a clinical assessment of each participant's PD severity and arriving at the diagnosis of PD by applying strict UF brain bank criteria.
  • Healthy older adults: History of PD, or any other neurologic or neurodegenerative disease including stroke.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of head and neck cancer, and radiation treatment to the head or neck
  • History of breathing disorders or diseases (e.g. chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), asthma, lung cancer)
  • History of smoking in the past 5 years, or for more than 5 years at any one time
  • Severe cognitive deficits including dementia.
  • Difficulty complying with protocol due to severe neuropsychological disorder (i.e., severe depression: 31 or greater on the BDI)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Parkinson's disease
Men and women with Parkinson's disease, between 45 and 85 years of age. The following will be done: Respiratory resistive load on inhalation and Fluoroscopic swallowing evaluation.
The participant will be seated in a chair, and will be instructed to "relax and breathe" through a facemask. Five respiratory resistive loads (5-40 cmH2O resistive pressure) will be applied between 3-5 times during inhalation. Following each loaded breath, participants will rate the perceived difficulty of breathing in.
Participants with PD only will receive a swallowing evaluation as part of their routine clinical care. Generally, the standard clinical evaluation protocol consists of multiple swallows of thin liquid barium, pudding-thick barium, and a cracker or cookie coated with barium. Results are reviewed by the treatment speech-language pathologist, and for the purposes of this study, the researchers will review the most recently recorded swallow study and identify the worst observed penetration-aspiration (PA) score.
Healthy adults
Men and women without Parkinson's disease, between 45 and 85 years of age. The following will be done: Respiratory resistive load on inhalation.
The participant will be seated in a chair, and will be instructed to "relax and breathe" through a facemask. Five respiratory resistive loads (5-40 cmH2O resistive pressure) will be applied between 3-5 times during inhalation. Following each loaded breath, participants will rate the perceived difficulty of breathing in.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Perceived difficulty inhaling against each respiratory resistive load.
Time Frame: Baseline
Participants will rate the level of difficulty when inhaling against different levels of resistive load. The Borg scale ranges from 6-20, where 6 is 'no difficulty' and 20 is 'maximal difficulty.'
Baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The amount of pressure generated while inhaling against each resistive load
Time Frame: Baseline
The mouth pressure will be measured while each participant is inhaling through the facemask, against each resistive load level. This will be measured in cmH2O
Baseline

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total amount of air that can be expired from the lungs
Time Frame: Baseline
Spirometry will be used to determine the forced vital capacity, and forced expiratory volume in 1 second.
Baseline
The maximum amount of inspiratory pressure
Time Frame: Baseline
A manometer will be used to measure the maximum inspiratory pressure each participant can generate.
Baseline
Feelings of sadness or depression
Time Frame: Baseline
The Beck Depression Index (BDI) is a 21-item questionnaire that will be completed by each participant. Scores range from 1-10 (normal ups and downs) to over 40 (extreme depression).
Baseline
Feeling apathetic, or indifferent.
Time Frame: Baseline
The Marin apathy index (MAI) is a 14-item questionnaire with scores ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (a lot) for each item.
Baseline
Ability to swallow liquids and solids without material entering the airway
Time Frame: Baseline
The penetration-aspiration scale will be used by the investigators to determine whether material enters the airway during swallowing. This ranges from 1 (no penetration/aspiration) to 8 (silent aspiration).
Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Karen W Hegland, PHD, University of Florida

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 24, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 24, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

July 28, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

September 19, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 16, 2016

Last Verified

September 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Parkinson's Disease

Clinical Trials on Respiratory resistive load on inhalation

Subscribe