An Exploratory Study to Compare the Differences in Nutritional Status Between Patients With Mild and Moderate Alzheimer's Disease (AD) and Cognitively Intact Healthy People in an Asian Population

March 2, 2017 updated by: Danone Nutricia Research
Difference in nutritional status between patients with mild and moderate Alzheimer's Disease (AD) and cognitively intact healthy people in an Asian population

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The main objective of the current Asian nutritional status study is to get more insight into the nutritional status of AD patients in an Asian population in Asia. Plasma levels of several micronutrients and the fatty acid profile will be compared between patients with mild and moderate AD and cognitively intact healthy controls in an Asian population

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

191

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Singapore, Singapore, 119074
        • National University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with mild and moderate Alzheimer's Disease (AD) and cognitively intact healthy people

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 50 years old
  • Asian ethnicity
  • Group 1: Cognitively intact healthy volunteers defined by Cumulative Illness Rating Scale for Geriatrics rating of ≤ 2 for all categories except for the category "psychiatric illness" which should have a rating of 0 and a CDR of 0 within 1 year prior to the visit.

OR

Group 2a: AD patients clinically diagnosed with mild AD (according to the National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders, and Stroke-Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders criteria (McKhann et al., 1984)) with Clinical Dementia Rating-1

OR

Group 2b: AD patients clinically diagnosed with moderate AD (according to the National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders, and Stroke-Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders criteria (McKhann et al., 1984)) with Clinical Dementia Rating-2

- Written informed consent provided according to local regulations.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Group 1 only: Current diagnosis of AD or other dementias according to National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders, and Stroke-Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders criteria (McKhann et al.,1984 )
  • Group 2 only: Change in dose within 2 months prior to visit of AD medication (e.g. donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine or memantine)

Group 1 and 2:

  • Diagnosis of significant neurological disease (for Groups 2a and 2b: other than AD), including vascular dementia according to National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders, and Stroke-Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders criteria, cerebral tumour, Huntington's Disease, Parkinson's Disease, normal pressure hydrocephalus, seizures, major depression, schizophrenia and other entities
  • Use of vitamins supplements (only vitamins supplements C and D are allowed) for 3 months prior to the visit
  • Use of vitamin B injections
  • Alcohol or drug abuse as per investigator's judgement
  • Investigator's uncertainty about the willingness or ability of the patient to comply with the protocol requirements
  • Participation in any other studies involving investigational or marketed products concomitantly or within two weeks prior to entry into the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Control
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Mild and Moderate Alzheimer's Disease
Cognitively intact healthy people

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Uridine
Time Frame: 1 day
To look at nutritional Status in the blood
1 day
Serum Phospholipids and Fatty Acid Profile
Time Frame: 1 day

Serum Phospholipids, fatty acid profile e.g. docosahexaenoic acid / eicosapentaenoic acid / phosphatidylcholine docosahexaenoic acid

To look at nutritional Status in the blood

1 day
Red Blood Cell Phospholipids and fatty acid profile
Time Frame: 1 day

Red Blood Cell Phospholipids, fatty acid profile e.g. docosahexaenoic acid / eicosapentaenoic acid / phosphatidylcholine docosahexaenoic acid

To look at nutritional Status in the blood

1 day
Plasma polar lipid profile
Time Frame: 1 day

Plasma polar lipid profile including several types of phospholipids and their specific species; and cholesterol-esters

To look at nutritional Status in the blood

1 day
Choline
Time Frame: 1 day
To look at nutritional Status in the blood
1 day
Homocysteine
Time Frame: 1 day
To look at nutritional Status in the blood
1 day
Vitamin B6
Time Frame: 1 day
To look at nutritional Status in the blood
1 day
Folate
Time Frame: 1 day
To look at nutritional Status in the blood
1 day
Vitamin B12
Time Frame: 1 day
To look at nutritional Status in the blood
1 day
Selenium
Time Frame: 1 day
To look at nutritional Status in the blood
1 day
Vitamin E
Time Frame: 1 day
To look at nutritional Status in the blood
1 day
Vitamin D
Time Frame: 1 day
To look at nutritional Status in the blood
1 day
HbA1C (haemoglobin A1C )
Time Frame: 1 day
Other blood parameters
1 day
Liver Function - Alanine Aminotransferase and Aspartate Aminotransferase
Time Frame: 1 day
Other blood parameters
1 day
Kidney function - Creatinine
Time Frame: 1 day
Other blood parameters
1 day
Inflammatory marker
Time Frame: 1 day
C-reactive protein analysed using high sensitive C-reactive protein
1 day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 27, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 23, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

September 25, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 3, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 2, 2017

Last Verified

March 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mild and Moderate Alzheimer's Disease

3
Subscribe